AbstractThe regenerative ability of the pectoral fins of 14 species from 6 euteleostean families was tested. Blastema formation and distal outgrowth was observed in all species, indicating the initiation of regeneration in all species tested. Interspecific variation exists with respect to the frequency of malformations and the patterns produced by heteromorphic regeneration. Taking into account published reports on pectoral fin regeneration, the systematic distribution of homo‐ and heteromorphic regeneration leads to the following conclusions: 1) regenerative ability of pectoral fins is a property inherited from the common ancestor of euteleosteans. Whether it is also the ancestral condition for the whole teleostean group cannot be determined, because reports on more primitive teleosteans like the herring and the osteoglossimorphs are missing. 2) A propensity to produce high frequencies of heteromorphic regenerates originated independently at least three times in Cypriniformes, Scorpaeniformes, and Perciformes. 3) Impaired regeneration is most commonly found in bottom fishes, although not all ground fish groups show heteromorphic regeneration. This suggests that impaired regeneration is not directly related to bottom dwelling, but most probably originated as a side effect of other adaptive changes. Hence, neither the presence nor the loss of faithful regeneration can be associated with particular adaptive scenarios in this group, since regeneration seems to be ancestral to all major euteleost groups and its loss has no clear adaptive significance. Whether there are adaptive reasons to maintain regenerative capability or whether there are cases of reestablishment of regeneration after it was lost cannot be decided on the basis of recent evidence. More observations on phylogenetically closely related species with variable regenerative capability are necessary to assess adaptive explanations of regeneratio