首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Topical Lidocaine‐Prilocaine Versus Lidocaine for Neonatal CircumcisionA Randomi...
Topical Lidocaine‐Prilocaine Versus Lidocaine for Neonatal CircumcisionA Randomized Controlled Trial

 

作者: PATRICK WOODMAN,  

 

期刊: Obstetrics & Gynecology  (OVID Available online 1999)
卷期: Volume 93, issue 5, Part 1  

页码: 775-779

 

ISSN:0029-7844

 

年代: 1999

 

出版商: OVID

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

ObjectiveTo evaluate epicutaneous application of 5% lidocaine-prilocaine and 30% lidocaine cream anesthetics for neonatal circumcision.MethodsThe efficacy of 5% lidocaine-prilocaine and 30% lidocaine creams was compared in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Sixty-one neonates were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 5% prilocaine-lidocaine (n= 20), 30% lidocaine (n= 20), and a control group that received an acid-mantle cream (n= 21). Heart rate, oxygen saturation, and crying time were monitored before, during, and after circumcision. Blood pressure was measured before and after circumcision.ResultsMean peak heart rates for the 5% lidocaine-prilocaine, 30% lidocaine, and control groups (± standard deviation) were 146 ± 16, 157 ± 10, and 164 ± 16 beats per minute, respectively. During four of six active phases of circumcision, the 5% lidocaine-prilocaine group suppressed significant increases in heart rate better than 30% lidocaine, which was more effective than control (dorsal clamp,P< .001; bell clamp on,P= .001; tightening,P= .001; bell clamp off,P< .001). During tightening of the bell clamp, significantly less crying was seen in the 5% lidocaine-prilocaine group (13 ± 12 seconds) compared with 30% lidocaine (24 ± 14 seconds) and controls (38 ± 27 seconds) (P< .001). The group that received 5% lidocaine-prilocaine also had no significant increase in systolic (t= 1.6,P= .12) or diastolic (t= 1.9,P= .067, respectively) blood pressure, unlike the group receiving 30% lidocaine (t= 4.8,P= .001 andt= 2.9,P= .009, respectively) and the placebo group (t= 2.5,P= .023 andt= 2.3,P= .032). There were no significant differences in oxygen saturation (&agr; = .05, power 0.79).ConclusionEpicutaneous 5% lidocaine-prilocaine was more effective than 30% lidocaine for neonatal circumcision, better reducing neonatal stress indicators. Lidocaine-prilocaine significantly shortened crying time during one of the most painful phases of circumcision. Both topical anesthetics were more effective than placebo in attenuating the behavioral and physiologic indicators of neonatal pain.

 

点击下载:  PDF (128KB)



返 回