首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 A Randomized Comparison of the Effects of Gradual Prolonged Versus Standard Primary Bal...
A Randomized Comparison of the Effects of Gradual Prolonged Versus Standard Primary Balloon Inflation on Early and Late OutcomeResults of a Multicenter Clinical Trial

 

作者: E. Ohman,   J-F Marquis,   Donald Ricci,   Robert Brown,   Merril Knudtson,   Dean Kereiakes,   Joseph Samaha,   James Margolis,   Alan Niederman,   Larry Dean,   Paul Gurbel,   Michael Sketch,   Nancy Wildermann,   Kerry Lee,   Robert Califf,  

 

期刊: Circulation  (OVID Available online 1994)
卷期: Volume 89, issue 3  

页码: 1118-1125

 

ISSN:0009-7322

 

年代: 1994

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: angioplasty;perfusion;clinical trials;restenosis

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

BackgroundObservational studies have suggested that prolonged balloon inflation during coronary angioplasty is associated with a high clinical success rate. This randomized clinical trial sought to evaluate the impact of primary gradual and prolonged inflations versus standard short dilatations in patients undergoing elective angioplasty.Methods and ResultsIn phase 1 of the study, patients were randomized to receive two to four standard (1 minute) dilatations one or two prolonged (15 minutes) dilatations after a perfusion balloon had been placed across a single target lesion. Patients with unsuccessful angiographic appearance after phase 1 dilatations had further dilatations in phase 2. Patients were followed for 6 to 12 months after the procedure. Of 478 patients, 242 received a median of one prolonged dilatation of 15 minutes' duration, and 236 received three dilatations for a median of 1 minute. Patients assigned to prolonged dilatations had a higher success rate (≤50% residual visual stenosis) (95% versus 89%;P= .016), less severe residual stenosis by quantitative angiography median [25th and 75th percentiles], 35% [26%, 42%] versus 38% [30%, 46%];P= .001), and a lower rate of major dissections 3% versus 9%;P= .003) at the end of phase 1. A total of 114 patients had further dilatations in phase 2 - 43 in the prolonged arm and 71 in the standard arm. The final procedural success rate was 98% with both primary dilatation strategies, which included additional maneuvers such as prolonged dilatations in the patients randomized to the primary standard dilatation. Overall, 320 of 416 patients (77%) who were discharged after a successful procedure without any in-hospital event (death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, abrupt closure, or repeat angioplasty in target vessel) returned for follow-up angiography. The restenosis rate (>50% residual visual stenosis) was 44% (95% confidence interval, 37% to 52%) in the prolonged dilatation group and 44% (36% to 52%) in the standard dilatation group. The primary angiographic end point of failure at the end of phase 1, abrupt closure, or restenosis throughout the study period was similar in both groups (prolonged, 51%; standard, 49%;P= .62). The secondary end point of absence of clinical events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or repeat angioplasty in target vessel) also was similar (prolonged, 66%; standard, 74%;P= .15).ConclusionsPrimary gradual and prolonged dilatations caused less arterial trauma with a modestly larger arterial lumen compared with standard dilatations. This initial improvement in angiographic appearance did not lead to a significant reduction in restenosis or clinical adverse events during follow-up.

 

点击下载:  PDF (1681KB)



返 回