首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Inhibitory Effect of Green Tea Extract on the Process of Pancreatic Carcinogenesis Indu...
Inhibitory Effect of Green Tea Extract on the Process of Pancreatic Carcinogenesis Induced byN‐Nitrosobis‐(2‐oxypropyl)amine (BOP) and on Tumor Promotion After Transplantation ofN‐Nitrosobis‐(2‐hydroxypropyl)amine (BHP)‐Induced Pancreatic Cancer in Syrian Hamsters

 

作者: Akihito Hiura,   Masahiro Tsutsumi,   Katsusuke Satake,  

 

期刊: Pancreas  (OVID Available online 1997)
卷期: Volume 15, issue 3  

页码: 272-277

 

ISSN:0885-3177

 

年代: 1997

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: Green tea extract;Pancreatic carcinogenesis;Tumor promotion

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

Epidemiologic studies have shown a lower risk of gastrointestinal cancer in green tea drinkers. In the present study, the inhibitory effect of green tea extract (GTE) on the process of pancreatic carcinogenesis induced byN-nitrosobis-(2-oxypropyl)amine (BOP) and on tumor promotion after transplantation ofN-nitrosobis-(2-hydroxypropyl)amine (BHP)-induced pancreatic cancer were investigated in hamsters. In the first experiment, shortly after the initiation of pancreatic carcinogenesis by BOP, the animals in the GTE group were given GTE (0.5 mg/L) in their drinking water and the control group was given tap water. All animals were sacrificed 24 weeks later. There were no significant differences in body weight, water intake, or food consumption between the two groups during the experiments. GTE consumption was ∼1.25 mg/day/100 g body weight during this experiment. Seven of the 13 hamsters (54%) in the control group were found to have pancreatic tumors, versus six of the 18 hamsters (33%) in the GTE group. The average number of tumors in the control group was 1.0/hamster, compared with 0.5/hamster in the GTE group. The overall incidence of macroscopic pancreatic tumors in the GTE group was about half that in the control group. The incidence of pancreatic cancer was 54% (12/13) in the control group and 44% (8/18) in the GTE group. The number of pancreatic cancers, including invasive carcinoma and carcinoma in situ, in the GTE group was 0.88/hamster, significantly lower than in the control group (1.68/hamster) (p< 0.05). The incidence of atypical ductal hyperplasia, which is thought to be an early pancreatic cancer, was also significantly lower in the GTE group than in the control group (1.50/hamster vs. 4.65/hamster) (p< 0.05). In the second experiment, 1-mm3pieces of BHP-induced pancreatic cancer were transplanted into the back of hamsters. The control group (N= 16) was maintained on the basal diet and tap water throughout the experiment, and the GTE group (N= 16) was also maintained on the basal diet and tap water for the first 3 weeks after transplantation, when successful transplantation was confirmed and, thereafter, given tap water containing GTE (0.5 mg/L) for an additional 12 weeks. Tumor growth was similar in both groups until 11 weeks after transplantation, but inhibition of tumor growth became apparent after 11 weeks in the GTE group. At 13 weeks, the average tumor volume in the GTE group was 1.01 ± 0.11 × 104 mm3, significantly smaller than that in the control group (1.98 ± 0.37 × 104 mm3) (p< 0.05). The results demonstrated that GTE has an inhibitory effect on the process of pancreatic carcinogenesis and on tumor promotion of transplanted pancreatic cancer. These results suggest that GTE may come to serve as a chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agent for pancreatic cancer.

 

点击下载:  PDF (651KB)



返 回