首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Association of within-tree jack pine budworm feeding patterns with canopy level and wit...
Association of within-tree jack pine budworm feeding patterns with canopy level and within-needle variation of water, nutrient, and monoterpene concentrations

 

作者: Kimberly F Wallin,   Kenneth F Raffa,  

 

期刊: Canadian Journal of Forest Research  (NRC Available online 1998)
卷期: Volume 28, issue 2  

页码: 228-233

 

ISSN:0045-5067

 

年代: 1998

 

DOI:10.1139/x97-174

 

出版商: NRC Research Press

 

数据来源: NRC

 

摘要:

The possibility that uneven within-tree feeding patterns by jack pine budworm (Choristoneura pinus pinusFreeman) larvae could be related to underlying variation in host jack pine (Pinus banksianaLamb.) foliar water, nutrient, and monoterpene contents was considered.Choristoneura pinus pinusfeeds disproportionately in the upper portion of the canopy and almost exclusively on the basal portions of needles. Within needles, the distribution of water, several nutrients, and monoterpenes varied significantly between the distal and basal sections. Water, nitrogen, sulfur, manganese, and zinc levels occurred in higher concentrations in the distal section of the needle, which would not be predicted based onC. pinus pinusfeeding patterns. Phosphorus, potassium, calcium, iron, and copper were significantly higher in the basal section. Although the latter differences might be predicted based onC. pinus pinusfeeding patterns, they were not strong (ranging from 7.8% to 36.4% relative differences, as compared with 10.7%-50.0% relative differences in the former group). By contrast, concentrations of foliar monoterpenes were more strongly associated with known feeding patterns ofC. pinus pinus.These relative differences ranged from myrcene (26.8%) to limonene (44.79%). Thus, foliar differences affecting within-needle feeding selection appear more associated with allelochemicals than nutrients or water. In contrast with the within-needle associations between larval feeding and foliar chemistry, no associations between upper and lower canopy foliage were observed. Water, nutrients, and monoterpenes were evenly distributed across the upper and lower canopy locations. Thus, differential feeding between canopy locations cannot be explained by foliar constituents. Rather, it is more likely explained by other environmental factors, such as proximity to and density of reproductive and vegetative shoots.

 

点击下载:  PDF (117KB)



返 回