AbstractThe relationship between public policy and scientific investigation is explored by a review of the experience with methadone maintenance treatment for narcotic addiction. The implementation of a widespread treatment effort in Hong Kong in the 1970s is contrasted with recent policies in regard to methadone treatment expansion in the United States. In neither case did research fmdings form the basis for public policy. In Hong Kong, rapid expansion of methadone treatment was initiated before scientific evidence was available to support this course, and in the United States treatment expansion has been rejected despite extensive evidence of its utility and safety. Decisions by government officials and health care providers, as in the case of addiction treatment, may be influenced more by philosophy and intuition than by scientific evidence. Scientists must recognize and address this reality if they are to play a meaningful role in shaping public health policy.