Polyethylmethacrylate in dilute solution
作者:
K. Karunakaran,
M. Santappa,
期刊:
Die Makromolekulare Chemie
(WILEY Available online 1968)
卷期:
Volume 111,
issue 1
页码: 20-35
ISSN:0025-116X
年代: 1968
DOI:10.1002/macp.1968.021110103
出版商: Hüthig&Wepf Verlag
数据来源: WILEY
摘要:
AbstractPolyethylmethacrylate (PEM) was prepared by bulk polymerization and fractionated using acetone/acetone‐water (2:1 V/V) mixture. The solution properties of fractionated as well as unfractionated polymers were investigated in various solvents (ethylacetabte, toluene, ethylacetate‐ethanol) by light scattering and viscosity at 35°C. Osmotic pressure measurements were also carried out on selected polymer samples for the evaluation of width of distribution. [η]–Mwand (r2)1/2–Mwrelationships for these systems were established. Ethylacetate was found to be a bad solvent compared to toluene and methylethyketone. In the case of unfractionated PEM, the parameters like [η]2/3M1/3,Mw/[η], and Φ were corrected for molecular weight heterogeneity assuming SCHULZ‐ZIMM distribution. For the evaluation of FLORY's constant K, and the unperturbed dimension (r 20)1/2of the polymer, FLORY‐FOX, KURATA‐STOCKMAYER, and STOCKMAYER‐FIXMAN methods were employed. The K and (r 20)1/2values evaluated from the FLORY‐FOX method were almost similar to those measured in a Θ solvent, while the other two methods yielded higher values. A comparison of the measured (r2) 1/2wand that calculated from KIRKWOOD‐RISEMAN and DEBYE‐BUECHE theories indicated the polymer coil as conforming to a statistical chain. The molecular weight dependence of A2, the second virial coefficient, for PEM/ethylacetate was established and the value of A2compared well with that calcu
点击下载:
PDF
(694KB)
返 回