首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 A fallacy in the definition of ΔH*
A fallacy in the definition of ΔH*

 

作者: James R. Huntsman,  

 

期刊: Color Research&Application  (WILEY Available online 1989)
卷期: Volume 14, issue 1  

页码: 41-43

 

ISSN:0361-2317

 

年代: 1989

 

DOI:10.1002/col.5080140109

 

出版商: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company

 

数据来源: WILEY

 

摘要:

AbstractWhen a color differs from the reference, it is desirable to ascribe the difference to differences in the perceptual attributes of hue, chroma, and/or lightness through psychometric correlates of these attributes. To this end, the CIE has recommended the quantity ΔH* as a psychometric correlate of hue as defined by ΔH* = [(ΔE*)2‐ (ΔL*)2‐ (ΔC*)2]1/2, where the correlates correspond to either the 1976 CIELAB or CIELUV color spaces. Since ΔH* is defined as a “leftover,” this definition is valid only to the extent that ΔE* comprises exclusively ΔL*, ΔC*, and ΔH* and that ΔL*, ΔC*, and ΔH* are mutually independent compositionally, both psychophysically and psychometrically. It will be shown that as now defined ΔH* lacks psychometric independence of chroma and always leads to incorrect hue difference determination. Such a deficiency causes problems, especially in the halftone color printing industry, since it can suggest an incorrect adjustment for the hue of the inks. A revised definition herein of ΔH* provides a psychometric hue difference independent of chroma, valid for large and small psychometric color differences regardless of chroma. However, for small chromas, the seldom used metric ΔCmight be a better color difference metric than ΔH* because complex appearance effects make the perceptual discrimination of lightness, chroma, and hue components more difficu

 

点击下载:  PDF (296KB)



返 回