首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE NEUROHYPOPHYSEAL HORMONE [8‐ARGININE] VASOPRESSIN AND ITS ANAL...
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE NEUROHYPOPHYSEAL HORMONE [8‐ARGININE] VASOPRESSIN AND ITS ANALOG [7‐(3,4‐DEHYDROPROLINE), 8‐ARGININE]VASOPRESSIN IN AQUEOUS SOLUTION: An Examination of the Nonlabile Protons by1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

 

作者: HERMAN R. WYSSBROD,   ALAN J. FISCHMAN,   WILLIAM M. WITTBOLD,   CLARK W. SMITH,   RODERICH WALTER,   I.L. SCHWARTZ,  

 

期刊: International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research  (WILEY Available online 1981)
卷期: Volume 17, issue 1  

页码: 48-55

 

ISSN:0367-8377

 

年代: 1981

 

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-3011.1981.tb01967.x

 

出版商: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

 

关键词: antidiuretic hormone;arginine vasopressin;conformation;3,4‐dehydroproline‐containing peptide;double‐resonance difference spectroscopy;neurohypophyseal hormone;nuclear magnetic resonance;peptide hormones;proton magnetic resonance;solution conformation;vaso

 

数据来源: WILEY

 

摘要:

[7‐(3, 4‐Dehydroproline), 8‐arginine]vasopressin ([Δ3‐Pro7]AVP), an active analog of the naturally occurring neurohypophyseal hormone [8‐arginine]vasopressin (AVP), was studied in D2O at pD 3.3 and 23° by1H n.m.r. spectroscopy, and chemical shifts (SdLs) and some of the coupling constants for the nonlabile protons (1Hs) were determined and compared to those previously reported by us for AVP in D2O at pD 3.8 and 20° (Wyssbrod et al., 7979a, b). Double‐ resonance difference spectroscopy (Gibbons et al., 1975) was used to reveal positions of certain resonances obscured by overlap with resonances of other1Hs.Values of δ of corresponding protons in [Δ3‐Pro7]AVP and AVP are quite similar, and the small differences that are observed can be explained on the basis of (a) magnetic anisotropy from the double bond in the Δ3‐prolyl residue, (b) a slight difference in acidity of the samples in the two studies, or (c) uncertainty in the experimentally determined value of δ. Values of δ for the1Hs in the Δ3‐prolyl and prolyl residues in the two peptides are reported.Our tentative conclusion is that the differences in reported biological activities of [Δ3‐Pro7]AVP and AVP (Botos et al., 1979) are probably not[Δ3‐PRO7, ARG8] VASOPRESSIN related to a perturbation in the conformational state of the backbone, but that they might be explained, in part, by a change in the conformation of the five‐ membered ring of residue 7 and, in part, by π‐π interaction between the 3‐pyrroline ring of the Δ3‐prolyl residue of [Δ3‐Pro7]AVP and the receptor involved in the antidiuretic response but not the receptor involved in the pressor response, in accordance with the suggestion of Walter (1977) that π‐π interactions might, in some cases, b

 

点击下载:  PDF (595KB)



返 回