首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Conventional novolak resists for storage ring x‐ray lithography
Conventional novolak resists for storage ring x‐ray lithography

 

作者: J. G. Lane,   J. R. Maldonado,   A. N. Cleland,   R. P. Haelbich,   J. P. Silverman,   J. M. Warlaumont,  

 

期刊: Journal of Vacuum Science&Technology B: Microelectronics Processing and Phenomena  (AIP Available online 1983)
卷期: Volume 1, issue 4  

页码: 1072-1075

 

ISSN:0734-211X

 

年代: 1983

 

DOI:10.1116/1.582679

 

出版商: American Vacuum Society

 

关键词: masking;microelectronics;photoresists;x radiation;storage rings;line widths;comparative evaluations;electron beams;mev range 100−1000;performance;radiation doses;sensitivity;optical modulation;processing;testing;opacity;thickness;fabrication

 

数据来源: AIP

 

摘要:

This paper describes the lithographic processing of several positive novolak‐based resists exposed on the IBM x‐ray lithography system at the Brookhaven National Laboratory 750 MeV storage ring. One of the advantages of the storage ring exposure system has been the ability to use resist development processes which are the same as the corresponding optical or e‐beam processes. The exposure system and the x‐ray mask used for resist evaluation are described elsewhere in this symposium. Determining the best process conditions requires consideration of mask contrast as well as the desired linewidth and profile control, particularly in the presence of topography. Data will be presented and compared with results obtained using other lithographic systems (i.e., e‐beam and conventional source x‐ray). In particular, the relationship of mask absorber thickness to process window will be presented using a simple model of the development process. Using the process window defined by this model, we have exposed test patterns and typical device patterns in 1 to 2 μm thick conventional positive novolak resists. Linewidth control data as a function of dose and development time were determined for one resist at doses in the 100–200 mJ/cm2range and compared with corresponding results using electron beam exposure. The x‐ray exposures compared favorably with the electron beam exposures in the dosage ranges considered.

 

点击下载:  PDF (261KB)



返 回