首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 A Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Basis for the Selection and Use of Slow Release Theophyl...
A Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Basis for the Selection and Use of Slow Release Theophylline Products

 

作者: Leslie Hendeles,   R. Peter Iafrate,   Miles Weinberger,  

 

期刊: Clinical Pharmacokinetics  (ADIS Available online 1984)
卷期: Volume 9, issue 2  

页码: 95-135

 

ISSN:0312-5963

 

年代: 1984

 

出版商: ADIS

 

数据来源: ADIS

 

摘要:

In order to achieve the greatest chance for maximum benefit from theophylline in the management of chronic asthma, the serum concentration should be maintained in the therapeutic range of 10 to 20 &mgr;g/ml. Conventional rapid release formulations produce excessive fluctuations in serum concentrations that can result in variability in clinical response between doses. In contrast, slow release formulations have the potential to achieve relatively constant serum concentrations with 12-hour dosing intervals, thus providing around-the-clock stabilisation of the hyper-reactive airways that characterise chronic asthma. Furthermore, the decreased frequency of dosing with these formulations can improve patient compliance. However, significant differences in rate and extent of absorption exist between the available formulations. Single-dose bioavailability studies comparing a slow release product with an oral solution or plain uncoated tablet in a crossover design permit examination of the rate and extent of absorption. Comparison of a slow release product with an oral reference following multiple doses at steady-state permits examination of the extent but generally not rate of absorption.The mean fraction absorbed-time profile, calculated from a modification of the Wagner-Nelson equation, is a process-independent method of comparing rates of absorption of different products after single doses. A prospective study in 14 children with chronic asthma has demonstrated that this modified equation, when rearranged to iteratively solve for serum concentrations, can accurately predict steady-state serum concentrations for different dosing intervals in patient populations with different rates of elimination. When slow release products are compared in this manner at 8- or 12-hour dosing intervals for patients with slow elimination, clinically relevant differences between brands are not apparent. However, in patients with rapid elimination, i.e. children, cigarette smokers, and 25% of non-smoking adults, application of this method shows that only some formulations (i.e. ‘Slo-Bid Gyrocaps’ and ‘Theo-Dur’, which is also marketed under different brand names such as ‘Sustaire’, ‘Pulmi-Dur’ and ‘Theolin Retard’) can maintain serum concentrations within the therapeutic range for an entire 12-hour dosing interval. More rapidly absorbed slow release products must be administered at 8-hour dosing intervals in patients with rapid elimination, despite promotional claims to the contrary. Current products promoted for once-a-day administration are clinically inadequate because of incomplete and erratic absorption, and/or excessive serum concentration fluctuations. With one of these formulations, ‘Theo-24’ (also marketed under the name ‘Pulmo-Timelets’), there is evidence that food induces dose dumping of potentially toxic amounts of the drug.The primary goal for a slow release product should be to maintain a constant serum concentration which is a function of the rate of absorption (a product variable), the rate of elimination (a patient variable), and the dosing interval (a prescribing variable). The dose of all slow release theophylline products must be slowly titrated to age-specific mean weight-adjusted levels before serum concentrations are obtained to guide final dosage adjustment.

 

点击下载:  PDF (2729KB)



返 回