Empirical Comparison of Approaches to Forming Strata
作者:
DanielA. Bloch,
MarkR. Segal,
期刊:
Journal of the American Statistical Association
(Taylor Available online 1989)
卷期:
Volume 84,
issue 408
页码: 897-905
ISSN:0162-1459
年代: 1989
DOI:10.1080/01621459.1989.10478853
出版商: Taylor & Francis Group
关键词: Classification tree;Contingency table;Logistic regression;Standardization;Stratification
数据来源: Taylor
摘要:
In medical studies, the computation of a meaningful incidence rate frequently demands adjustment for covariates. One means for achieving such adjustment isstandardization.The (directly) standardized rate is calculated by using the appropriate weighted average of rates overstratadetermined by the covariates. Thus strata formation is crucial in obtaining good results. This article compares three competing methods for stratification using data from a drug study in which the incidence rate of a certain side effect is of interest. The techniques examined are (a) contingency-table cell aggregation, (b) classification trees, and (c) logistic regression. The relative merits of the three methods are discussed.
点击下载:
PDF (1653KB)
返 回