首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Effect of Impaired Renal Function and Haemodialysis on the Pharmacokinetics of Aprepita...
Effect of Impaired Renal Function and Haemodialysis on the Pharmacokinetics of Aprepitant

 

作者: Arthur J Bergman,   Thomas Marbury,   Trisha Fosbinder,   Suzanne Swan,   Lisa Hickey,   Thomas E Bradstreet,   John Busillo,   Kevin J Petty,   Kala-Jyoti Viswanathan Aiyer,   Marvin Constanzer,   Su-Er W Huskey,   Anup Majumdar,  

 

期刊: Clinical Pharmacokinetics  (ADIS Available online 2005)
卷期: Volume 44, issue 6  

页码: 637-647

 

ISSN:0312-5963

 

年代: 2005

 

出版商: ADIS

 

关键词: Aprepitant, pharmacokinetics;Neurokinin 1 antagonists, pharmacokinetics;Renal impairment;Haemodialysis

 

数据来源: ADIS

 

摘要:

BackgroundThe neurokinin NK1-receptor antagonist aprepitant has demonstrated efficacy in preventing highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.ObjectiveThe objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics and safety of aprepitant.Subjects and methodsA total of 32 patients and healthy subjects were evaluated in this open-label, two-part study. Pharmacokinetic parameters after a single oral dose of aprepitant 240mg were measured in eight patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring haemodialysis, eight patients with severe renal insufficiency (SRI [24-hour creatinine clearance <30 mL/min/1.73m2]) and 16 healthy and age-, sex- and weight-matched subjects (controls).ResultsIn ESRD patients, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 48 hours (AUC48) for aprepitant was on average approximately 36% lower than that observed in control subjects (ratio [ESRD patients/healthy controls] of geometric means = 0.64), but the 90% confidence interval 0.52, 0.78 for the ratio of true mean AUC48fell within the predefined target interval of 0.5, 2.0. Also in ESRD patients, there was no statistically or clinically significant difference in unbound aprepitant AUC (which may be more clinically relevant than total aprepitant AUC) when compared with healthy control subjects. Aprepitant pharmacokinetic parameters in ESRD patients were clinically similar when haemodialysis was initiated at 4 hours or 48 hours after aprepitant administration. In SRI patients, the ratio (SRI patients/healthy controls) of aprepitant AUC from zero to infinity (AUC∞) geometric mean value was 0.79 with a 90% confidence interval of 0.56, 1.10. On average, in SRI patients the principal aprepitant pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC∞, initial maximum plasma concentration [Cmax], time to initial Cmax, and apparent elimination half-life) were not statistically different from those obtained in healthy control subjects. Aprepitant was generally well tolerated in both ESRD and SRI patients.ConclusionThe results of this study demonstrate that ESRD, haemodialysis and SRI have no clinically meaningful effect on aprepitant pharmacokinetics. Therefore, no dosage adjustment of aprepitant is warranted in SRI or ESRD patients.

 

点击下载:  PDF (237KB)



返 回