SUMMARYThe presence of awns doubled the net photosynthetic rate of wheat ears and also increased the proportion of14CO2assimilated by the ear that moved to the grain. The effect of water supply on photosynthesis and movement of assimilates was greater for leaves than ears, so that drought increased the proportion of assimilate contributed by ear photosynthesis to grain filling from 13% to 24% in the awnless ears, and from 34% to 43% in the awned ears.14C assimilated by the ears was most important to the economy of the upper spikelets and to the distal florets in each spikelet, whereas flag leaf assimilate went mainly to the spikelets in the lower half of the ear, and to the proximal florets.Awns increased grain yield in the dry but not in the irrigated treatment, despite the large contribution of awned ears to grain filling. Either the supply of assimilate did not limit grain yield when water supply was not limiting, or there were compensating disadvantages to awns. However, they did not seem to have any adverse effect on the development of the upper florets, nor did they reduce grain number per ear.