首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Impact of the resin blood culture medium on the treatment of critically ill patients
Impact of the resin blood culture medium on the treatment of critically ill patients

 

作者: Phillip D. MA Levin,   Amos M. MD Yinnon,   Moshe MD Hersch,   Bernard PhD Rudensky,  

 

期刊: Critical Care Medicine  (OVID Available online 1996)
卷期: Volume 24, issue 5  

页码: 797-801

 

ISSN:0090-3493

 

年代: 1996

 

出版商: OVID

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

ObjectiveTo assess the relevance, both clinical and bacteriologic, of the use of resin-containing blood culture media in blood cultures taken from critically ill patients receiving antibiotics.DesignA prospective, open clinical trial.SettingThe mixed medical surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a 550-bed urban hospital.PatientsAll ICU patients admitted during a 3-month period (n equals 49) with suspected sepsis requiring blood cultures as part of their laboratory investigations.InterventionsThe use of an aerobic resin-containing blood culture medium, in addition to the regular aerobic and anaerobic media for all blood cultures taken.Measurements and Main ResultsEach blood culture result was classified as to its clinical significance. Changes in patient management were recorded. Culture sets in which the resin-containing bottle provided the information central to the change in patient management were identified. Bacteriologically, the results from the resin-containing medium were compared with the results from the aerobic and anaerobic media. Of 266 blood culture sets, 103 (39%) were positive, growing 278 bacterial and fungal isolates. Clinically, the resin-containing medium alone provided relevant data leading to changes in patient management on three occasions. On two of these occasions, cultures from the regular media provided the same data within 72 hrs. Bacteriologically, 77 (29%) aerobic bottles, 55 (21%) anaerobic bottles, and 89 (33%) resin-containing bottles were positive (statistical comparison of percentages: aerobic vs. resin-containing bottles, nonsignificant; aerobic vs. anaerobic bottles, p less than .046; anaerobic vs. resin-containing bottles, p less than .0027). A similar proportion of pathogens was isolated from the resin-containing bottles only (9%) and aerobic bottles only (6%). A higher proportion of contaminants was isolated from the resin-containing bottles only than the aerobic bottles only in the various sets (17% vs. 7%, p less than .046). The resin-containing bottle showed a trend toward increased detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia.ConclusionsThe resin-containing medium offers little clinical benefit to the majority of ICU patients. Bacteriologically, it seems to have a similar overall sensitivity as the regular aerobic medium (with the possible exception of a higher sensitivity for the isolation of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa), but a lower specificity. The wide-spread use of the resin-containing bottle cannot be recommended.(Crit Care Med 1996; 24:797-801)

 



返 回