首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Influence of Continuous Combined Estradiol‐Norethisterone Acetate Preparations o...
Influence of Continuous Combined Estradiol‐Norethisterone Acetate Preparations on Insulin Sensitivity in Postmenopausal Nondiabetic Women

 

作者: Renate Kimmerle,   Lutz Heinemann,   Tim Heise,   Ralf Bender,   Christian Weyer,   Sabine Hirschberger,   Michael Berger,  

 

期刊: Menopause  (OVID Available online 1999)
卷期: Volume 6, issue 1  

页码: 36-42

 

ISSN:1072-3714

 

年代: 1999

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: Insulin sensitivity;Postmenopausal women;Estrogen;Progestogen;Hormone replacement.

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

Objective:Estrogen-progestogen replacement therapy (HRT) may be associated with deterioration of insulin sensitivity in comparison to estrogens alone, which tend to improve insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women. Insulin sensitivity with the use of continuous combined 17-β estradiol/norethis-terone acetate (E2/NETA) preparations has not been examined before in postmenopausal women.Design:In a double-blind randomized parallel study, we evaluated the effect of 2 mg E2/1 mg NETA (high dose E2/NETA), 1 mg E2/0.5 mg NETA (low dose E2/NETA), or placebo (P) on the insulin sensitivity index (S1) in three groups (18 women/group) of postmenopausal nondiabetic women (follicle stimulating hormone [FSH] > 40 mlU/mL, mean ± SD) aged 56 ± 3 years, BMI 25 ± 4 kg/m2, cholesterol 233 ± 42 mg/dL, and triglycerides 87 ± 36 mg/dL. Insulin sensitivity was measured by means of a two-step hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamp (insulin infusion rate, 0.25 and 1.0 mU/kg/min for 120 min each) at baseline and after 3 months of daily administration of high dose E2/NETA, low dose E2/NETA, or P. Analysis was performed assuming equivalence of start-end changes of insulin sensitivity among treatment groups (Anderson-Hauck test).Results:S1was 7.7 ± 2.9,7.5 ± 3.4, 6.8 ± 2.2 at baseline and 6.3 ± 3.0,7.9 ± 2.5, 7.1 ± 3.1 mL/min/m2per μ, U/mL 3 months after the administration of high dose E2/NETA, low dose E2/NETA, and P, respectively. The low dose E2/NETA group had start-to-end changes of S1which were equivalent to the P group (0.4 [95% confidence interval [CI] −0.8; 1.7] vs. 0.4 [-0.3; 1.0]) (p = 0.02). For the high dose E2/NETA group, equivalence could not be shown with either the P (p = 0.89) or with the low dose E2/NETA group (p = 0.90). S1within the high dose E2/NETA group decreased by —1.5 (95% CI −2.7; −0.2) mL/min/m2per μU/mL. HbA1cdecreased from 5.3 ± 0.3 to 5.1 ± 0.3% within the high dose E2/NETA group (p < 0.03) and remained unchanged within the low dose E2/NETA and P group. Fasting plasma glucose, fasting serum insulin, and C-peptide, as well as triglycerides and BMI were comparable among the groups at baseline and after 3 months. Total cholesterol decreased by 12% and 8% in women treated with high dose and low dose E2/NETA (p < 0.02), respectively, and remained unchanged within the P group.Conclusions:These results indicate that 3 months use of a low dose continuous E2/NETA preparation does not change insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women. At high dose of E2/NETA, a modest decrease seems possible. The effects of E2/NETA on other parameters of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism are neutral or favorable.

 

点击下载:  PDF (636KB)



返 回