|
1. |
Some aspects of the history of auroral research |
|
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union,
Volume 60,
Issue 51,
1979,
Page 1035-1036
Wilfried Schröder,
Preview
|
PDF (4471KB)
|
|
摘要:
From the reports in Aristotle(Meteorologia), Seneca(Naturalium Quaestionum), and Pliny(Historia Naturalis), as well as those from the Far East [Keimatsu, 1974], we may assume that auroras were known phenomena even in earlier times. However, for these early centuries the number of dates verified up to now is small. No systematic studies were made for these manifestations in the sky, and they remained puzzles. Some early views on atmospheric optics and other problems of the atmosphere originated with Alhazen, i.e. Muhammad b. al‐Hasan ibn al‐Haitan (about 965–1039). There are some thoughts on the physics of the atmosphere in Albertus Magnus (about 1206–1280), but without specific reference to auroras. In the outgoing Middle Age, from the 11th to the 15th centuries, there are no regular observations of sky
ISSN:0002-8606
DOI:10.1029/EO060i051p01035
年代:1979
数据来源: WILEY
|
2. |
Chatanika Facility |
|
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union,
Volume 60,
Issue 51,
1979,
Page 1036-1036
Murray J. Baron,
Preview
|
PDF (1066KB)
|
|
摘要:
I was pleasantly surprised to see the photograph of our Chatanika radar facilty on the cover ofEOS, 60(44) In case anyEOSreaders write to inquire about the facility, I thought I would provide you with some information.The Chatanika facility is an incoherent scatter radar used to perform research on the neutral atmosphere, ionosphere, and magnetosphere. It was established in 1971 with funds provided by the Defense Nuclear Agency. Currently, it is supported primarily by the National Science Foundation, with a number of other agencies (DNA, AFOSR, NASA) also sponsoring research. SRI International (formerly Stanford Research Institute) manages and operates the facility. Scientists representing 29 organizations from throughout the world have performed experiments at Chatanika or have been provided with data.
ISSN:0002-8606
DOI:10.1029/EO060i051p01036-01
年代:1979
数据来源: WILEY
|
3. |
Deep Ocean Drilling: Where the funding stands on Capitol Hill |
|
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union,
Volume 60,
Issue 51,
1979,
Page 1037-1037
Anonymous,
Preview
|
PDF (249KB)
|
|
摘要:
The future of federal funding in the earth and ocean sciences may be entwined in the details of current planning of the ocean deep drilling program for the next decade. Right now, important decisions are being considered by presidential advisor Frank Press that will influence the route by which funding, science, and the search for petroleum along passive continental margins will proceed.Part of the dangers that lie ahead are that the large costs of a program of this magnitude can easily encroach upon lesser, but important, programs. In jeopardy, for example, is a portion of the NSF (National Science Foundation) budget for research in the earth sciences. Cost overruns, inflation, and other priorities are the risks. The science, too, could be easily compromised if the decisions to be made within the next week or two are not the right ones.
ISSN:0002-8606
DOI:10.1029/EO060i051p01037-01
年代:1979
数据来源: WILEY
|
4. |
Statement of candidates for section presidents‐elect |
|
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union,
Volume 60,
Issue 51,
1979,
Page 1039-1039
Anonymous,
Preview
|
PDF (234KB)
|
|
摘要:
(Statements from all candidates for the office of section president will be published this month. The Oceanography and Seismology sections appeared in the December 4 issue ofEOS, and the statements for the Geodesy; Volcanology, Geochemistry and Petrology, and Solar‐Planetary Relations appeared in the December 11 issue. The statements for Hydrology, Planetology and Tectonophysics appear belo
ISSN:0002-8606
DOI:10.1029/EO060i051p01039
年代:1979
数据来源: WILEY
|
|