|
31. |
The influence of residual coronary stenosis on size of infarction after reperfusion in a canine preparation |
|
Circulation,
Volume 73,
Issue 6,
1986,
Page 1354-1359
B.,
STANLEY P.,
JACOB BLOOM,
SHERMAN M.,
JOHN M.,
Preview
|
PDF (1147KB)
|
|
摘要:
ABSTRACTThe effect of a residual coronary artery stenosis on size of myocardial infarction was studied in an open-chest canine preparation of coronary occlusion and reperfusion. Eighteen male mongrel dogs (16 to 26 kg) underwent left thoracotomy under general anesthesia; the circumflex artery was instrumented with a hydraulic cuff occluder, a screw clamp, and an electromagnetic flow probe. Animals were randomized to one of three groups: group I (n = 6) had a 6 hr circumflex occlusion, group II (n = 6) had a 2 hr occlusion followed by 4 hr of partial reperfusion through a residual stenosis adjusted to 30% of baseline flow, and group III (n = 6) had full reperfusion for 4 hr after a 2 hr occlusion. Zones of risk, infarction, and no reflow were defined by staining with Evans blue, triphenyl tetrazolium chloride, and fluorescein, respectively. At 6 hr the hearts were excised and areas of risk, infarction, no reflow, and hemorrhage were determined by planimetry of serial transverse heart slices (5 mm thick). Infarction as a percent of the risk area was 96 + 1% in group I, 90 2% in group II, and 79 4% in group III (p < .001), and the differences between each of the groups were significant. Gross hemorrhage was seen in none of the six dogs in group I, two of the six in group II, and five of the six in group III, but did not affect infarct size. We conclude that residual stenoses may exert a deleterious effect on the outcome of coronary reperfusion. In the clinical setting of coronary thrombolysis they may deserve aggressive treatment to maximize salvage of myocardium.
ISSN:0009-7322
出版商:OVID
年代:1986
数据来源: OVID
|
32. |
Overestimation of infarct size by quantitative twodimensional echocardiographythe role of tethering and of analytic procedures |
|
Circulation,
Volume 73,
Issue 6,
1986,
Page 1360-1368
FORCE,
THOMAS KEMPER,
ANDREW LORRI,
THOMAS MICHELE,
GILFOIL COHEN,
CAROL F.,
Preview
|
PDF (3440KB)
|
|
摘要:
ABSTRACTAnalyses of regional left ventricular systolic wall motion or thickening overestimate infarct size. We used quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of systolic thickening and contrast two-dimensional echocardiography to evaluate causes for that overestimation. The following possibilities were considered: (1) “tethering,” defined as dysfunction of contrast-enhancing myocardium adjacent to ischemic or contrast-negative regions, and (2) the role of standard center of mass analysis algorithms, which may overestimate wall motion abnormalities because of the axis shift produced by simultaneous systolic expansion of the ischemic segment and systolic contraction of the nonischemic segment. In the short-axis view in 12 animals, the echo contrast defect (ECD) occupied 32 + 7% of the left ventricular circumference. Extent of dysfunction by the center of mass analysis was 39 + 5% of the left ventricular circumference and correlation with ECD size was .68 (SEE = 5.2%). Thus 8 -+- 6% of the circumference of the left ventricle was assessed to be dysfunctional yet enhanced with contrast. Tethering accounted for only half of this (4 + 4% of left ventricular circumference) and involved less than 1 cm on either side of the ECD. The remaining overestimation by the center of mass analysis correlated significantly (r = .89, p < .01) with the amount of systolic expansion of the ECD. This expansion of the ECD (increase in angle subtended by the ECD of 11 ± 8%) was produced by the systolic shift in the center of mass toward the dysfunctional segment from contraction of the opposite, nonischemic segment, since true systolic lengthening of the ischemic (contrast-negative) segment wasminimal (increase of only 3 + 5%; p < .01 vs increase in angle subtended by ECD). When systolic function was analyzed independent of a center of mass with the ECD as an internal reference, the correlation between extent of dysfunction and ECD size improved to .84 (SEE = 3.8%). In conclusion, two-dimensional echocardiography has exaggerated the importance of tethering because of flaws in standard analysis algorithms. Tethering does lead to an unavoidable overestimation of infarct size, but the amount of myocardium involved is small and relatively predictable. The remainder of the overestimation of infarct size by two-dimensional echocardiography is critically dependent on systolic function of the opposite, nonischemic wall. Since this is variable, it accounts in large part for the suboptimal correlation between infarct size and extent of dysfunction by standard two-dimensional echocardiographic analyses.
ISSN:0009-7322
出版商:OVID
年代:1986
数据来源: OVID
|
|