摘要:

AbstractThe bone replacement process in the adult skeleton is known as remodeling. When bone is removed by osteoclasts, new bone is laid down by osteoblasts in the same place, because the load bearing requirement is unchanged. Bone is usually replaced because it is too old to carry out its function, which is mainly mechanical in cortical bone and mainly support for homeostasis and hematopoiesis in cancellous bone. Remodeling always begins on a quiescent bone surface, separated from the marrow by flat lining cells that are one of the two modes of terminal differentiation of osteoblasts. Lining cells are gatekeepers, able to be informed of the need for remodeling, and to either execute or mediate all four components of its activation‐selection and preparation of the site, recruitment of mononuclear preosteoclasts, budding of new capillaries, and attraction of preosteoclasts to the chosen site where they fuse into multinucleated osteoclasts.In cortical bone, osteonal remodeling is carried out by a complex and unique structure, the basic multicellular unit (BMU) that comprises a cutting cone of osteoclasts in front, a closing cone lined by osteoblasts following behind, and connective tissue, blood vessels and nerves filling the cavity. The BMU maintains its size, shape and internal organization for many months as it travels through bone in a controlled direction. Individual osteoclast nuclei are short‐lived, turning over about 8% per d, replaced by new preosteoclasts that originated in the bone marrow and travel in the circulation to the site of resorption. Refilling of bone at each successive cross‐sectional location is accomplished by a team of osteoblasts, probably originating from precursors within the local connective tissue, all assembled within a narrow window of time, at the right location, and in the right orientation to the surface. Each osteoblast team forms bone most rapidly at its onset and slows down progressively. Some of the osteoblasts are buried as osteocytes, some die, and the remainder gradually assume the shape of lining cells. Cancellous bone is more accessible to study than cortical bone, but is geometrically complex. Although remodeling conforms to the same sequence of surface activation, resorption and formation, its three‐dimensional organization is difficult to visualize from two‐dimensional histologic sections. But the average sizes of resorption sites, formation sites, and completed structural units increase progressively, as they do in cortical bone, indicating that the cancellous BMU travels across the surface digging a trench rather than a tunnel, but maintaining its size, shape and individual identity by the continuous recruitment of new cells, just as in cortical bone, a process that can be visualized as hemiosteonal remodeling. The conclusion that all remodeling is carried out by individual BMUs has important implications for bone biology, since many questions about how BMUs operate cannot be answered by studying either intact organisms or isolated cell systems. Many different steps in remodeling and many factors that influence each step have been identified, but very little is known about how the process is regulated in vivo to achieve its biologic purposes; most factors studied to date are likely permissive rather than regulatory in nature. Based on the proposed conceptual model of the BMU, much in vitro experimentation is relevant to the growth, modeling and repair of bone, but not to its remodeling in the adult skeleton. Further progress in the understanding of in vivo physiology will require the characterization of gene expression in individual cells to be related to the spatial and temporal organization of the BMU. This is likely to be possible only for osteonal remodeling in cortical bone in which, because of its geometric simplicity, individual BMUs can consistently be observed in two‐dimensional, longitudinal sections. © 1994 Wil

ISSN:0730-2312    

DOI:10.1002/jcb.240550303

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1994

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractAlthough the structural design of cellular bone (i.e., bone containing osteocytes that are regularly spaced throughout the bone matrix) dates back to the first occurrence of bone as a tissue in evolution, and although osteocytes represent the most abundant cell type of bone, we know as yet little about the role of the osteocyte in bone metabolism. Osteocytes descend from osteoblasts. They are formed by the incorporation of osteoblasts into the bone matrix. Osteocytes remain in contact with each other and with cells on the bone surface via gap junction–coupled cell processes passing through the matrix via small channels, the canaliculi, that connect the cell body–containing lacunae with each other and with the outside world. During differentiation from osteoblast to mature osteocyte the cells lose a large part of their cell organelles. Their cell processes are packed with microfilaments. In this review we discuss the various theories on osteocyte function that have taken in consideration these special features of osteocytes. These are (1) osteocytes are actively involved in bone turnover; (2) the osteocyte network is through its large cell‐matrix contact surface involved in ion exchange; and (3) osteocytes are the mechanosensory cells of bone and play a pivotal role in functional adaptation of bone. In our opinion, especially the last theory offers an exciting concept for which some biomechanical, biochemical, and cell biological evidence is already available and which fully warrants further investigations. © 1994 Wiley‐L

ISSN:0730-2312    

DOI:10.1002/jcb.240550304

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1994

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractGiant cell tumor of bone is a progressive, potentially malignant process which destroys skeletal tissue by virtue of its osteoclast complement. As a biological entity it provides a unique natrual model of bone resorption by osteoclasts whose recruitment and development is controlled by a neoplastic population of fibroblast‐like cells. Understanding of the etiopathogenesis of this tumor could provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying osteoblast–osteoclast interactions in normal and diseased bone. Recent studies have shown that the stromal cell component in giant cell tumors is the only proliferating subpopulation of cells, and the giant cells themselves are nonproliferative and reactive. These stromal cells express several genes associated with the osteoblastic phenotype, synthesize, to a limited degree, certain matrix proteins associated with bone, and express several factors which are presumably involved in the recruitment of osteoclasts. In culture, giant cell tumor–associated stromal cells promote the fusion of monocytes and the proliferation of osteoblasts either by the secretion of factors or cell–cell contact. Hence, giant cell tumor of bone is a self‐contained biosystem in which cells of both the stromal and hematopoietic lineages interact in a fashion similar to that observed in normal skeletal remodeling. The neoplastic nature of the stromal component, however, drives the hematopoietic precursors to undergo fusion, produces aggressive bone resorption, and results in extensive skeletal destruction. Examination of the various components of this system could lead to new directions for investigations aimed at a better understanding of osteoblast–osteoclast interactions. © 1994 Wil

ISSN:0730-2312    

DOI:10.1002/jcb.240550305

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1994

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractBone development and remodeling depend on complex interactions between bone‐forming osteoblasts, bone‐degrading osteoclasts, and other cells present within the bone microenvironment. Balanced control of bone formative and degradative processes is normally carefully maintained in the adult skeleton but becomes uncoupled in the course of aging or in various pathological disease states. Systemic regulators of bone metabolism and local mediators, including matrix molecules, cytokines, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and other autocrine or paracrine factors, regulate the recruitment, differentiation, and function of cells participating in bone formation and turnover. Although some of these interactions are now understood, many yet remain to be elucidated. Recent studies have begun exploring in detail how vascular endothelial cells and their products function in bone physiology. The findings are revealing that bone vascular endothelial cells may be members of a complex communication network in bone which operates between endothelial cells, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, macrophages, stromal cells, and perhaps other cell types found in bone as well. Therefore, multiple systemic and locally produced signals may be received, transduced, and integrated by individual cells and then propagated by the release from these cells of further signals targeted to other members of the bone cell network. In this manner, bone cell activities may be continuously coordinated to afford concerted actions and rapid responses to physiological changes. The bone microvasculature may play a pivotal role in these processes, both in linking circulatory and local signals with cells of the bone microenvironment and in actively contributing itself to the regulation of bone cell physiology. Thus, skeletal homeostasis and the coupling observed between bone resorption and bone formation during normal bone remodeling may be manifestations of this dynamic interactive communication network, operating via diverse signals not only between osteoblasts and osteoclasts but between many cell types residing within bone. © 1994 Wiley‐Lis

ISSN:0730-2312    

DOI:10.1002/jcb.240550306

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1994

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractControl of osteoblast growth and development can be characterized from receptor mediated events to nuclear messengers controlling gene transcription. From this analysis it is possible to formulate a model to explain the reciprocal relationship between growth and differentiation as well as differential cytokine modulation of osteoblast function. Central to this model are putative tissue specific transcriptional switches (possibly of the bHLH gene superfamily) that may repress proliferation and permit the regulation of mature osteoblast phenotypic characteristics. This model proposes that in post‐mitotic differentiated osteoblasts, tissue specific transcription factors determine the capacity to express osteoblastic characteristic, whereas receptor activated signalling cascades, namely, cAMP/protein kinase A, receptor serine/threonine kinase, and vitamin D receptor‐dependent pathways, regulate mature osteoblast‐specific gene expression. Activated differentiation switches also may feedback to transcriptionally repress proliferation. Conversely, in preosteoblasts, in which differentiation switches are turned off, distinct signalling cascades involving tyrosine kinases, PKC, and calcium/calmodulin regulate proliferation. Proliferating preosteoblasts also exhibit negative modulation of maturation either through inactivation of putative tissue‐specific transcription factors and/or through AP‐1 dependent phenotype suppression of genes expressed in mature osteoblast. Thus, the final outcome of transcriptional regulation of osteoblast function results from complex interactions between signalling pathways and permissive differentiating transcription factors. Though many aspects of this model remain speculative and require confirmation, it serves as a useful conceptual framework to further investigate the differential control of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation that may lead to improved pharmacologic ways to manipulate bone formation in vivo. © 1994 Wiley

ISSN:0730-2312    

DOI:10.1002/jcb.240550307

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1994

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractParathyroid hormone (PTH) plays a central role in regulation of calcium metabolism. For example, excessive or inappropriate production of PTH or the related hormone, parathyroid hormone related protein (PTHrP), accounts for the majority of the causes of hypercalcemia. Both hormones act through the same receptor on the osteoblast to elicit enhanced bone resorption by the osteoclast. Thus, the osteoblast mediates the effect of PTH in the resorption process. In this process, PTH causes a change in the function and phenotype of the osteoblast from a cell involved in bone formation to one directing the process of bone resorption. In response to PTH, the osteoblast decreases collagen, alkaline phosphatase, and osteopntin expression and increases production of osteocalcin, cytokines, and neutral proteases. Many of these changes have been shown to be due to effects on mRNA abundance through either transcriptional or post‐transcriptional mechanisms. However, the signal transduction pathway for the hormone to cause these changes is not completely elucidated in any case. Binding of PTH and PTHrP to their common receptor has been shown to result in activation of protein kinases A and C and increases in intracellular calcium. The latter has not been implicated in any changes in mRNA of osteoblastic genes. On the other hand activation of PKA can mimic all the effects of PTH; protein kinase C may be involved in some responses. We will discuss possible mechanisms linking PKA and PKC activation to changes in gene expression, particularly at the nuclear level. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss,

ISSN:0730-2312    

DOI:10.1002/jcb.240550308

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1994

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractInsulin‐like growth factor (IGF) I, a polypeptide synthesized by skeletal cells, is presumed to act as an autocrine regulator of bone formation. IGF I stimulates bone replication of preosteoblastic cells and enhances the differentiated function of the osteoblast. The synthesis of skeletal IGF I is regulated by systemic hormones, most notably parathyroid hormone and glucocorticoids, as well as by locally produced factors, such as prostaglandins and other skeletal growth factors. Whereas hormones and growth factors regulate IGF I synthesis, the exact level of regulation has not been established and may involve both transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms. The IGF I gene contains six exons, and both exon 1 and 2 contain transcription initiation sites. Extrahepatic tissues, including bone, express exon 1 transcripts, and regulation of the exon 1 promoter activity in osteoblasts is currently under study. It is apparent that the regulation of IGF I gene transcription as well as the regulation of mRNA stability is complex and tissue specific. It is possible that abnormalities in skeletal IGF I synthesis or activity play a role in the pathogenesis of bone disorders. In view of its important anabolic actions in bone, it is tempting to postulate the use of IGF I for the treatment of disorders characterized by decreased bone mass. An alternative could be the stimulation of the local production of IGF I in bone. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss,

ISSN:0730-2312    

DOI:10.1002/jcb.240550309

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1994

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractProenkephalin encodes a group of small peptides with opiate‐like activity, the endogenous opioids, known to function as neurohormones, neuromodulators, and neurotransmitters. Recently, we have demonstrated that in addition to its abundance in fetal brain tissue, proenkephalin is highly expressed in nondifferentiated mesodermal cells of developing fetuses. We identified the skeletal tissues, bone, and cartilage as major sites of proenkephalin expression. To examine the possibility that proenkephalin is involved in bone development we have studied the expression of this gene in bone‐derived cells, its modulation by bone active hormones, and the effects of enkephalin‐derived peptides on osteoblastic phenotype. Our studies revealed that osteoblastic cells synthesize high levels of proenkephalin mRNA which are translated, and the derived peptides are secreted. Reciprocal interrelationships between osteoblast maturation and proenkephalin expression were established. These results together with our observations demonstrating inhibitory effects of proenkephalin‐derived peptides on osteoblastic alkaline phosphatase activity, strongly support the notion that proenkephalin is involved in bone development. A different direction of research by other investigators has established the capability of the opioid system in the periphery to participate in the control of pain. On the basis of these two lines of observation, we would like to present the following hypothesis: The potential of embryonic skeletal tissue to synthesize proenkephalin‐derived peptides is retained in the adult in small defined undifferentiated cell populations. This potential is realized in certain situations requiring rapid growth, such as remodeling or fracture repair. We suggest that in these processes, similarly to the situation in the embryo, the undifferentiated dividing cells produce the endogenous opioids. In the adult these peptides may have a dual function, namely participating in the control of tissue regeneration and in the control of pain. © 1994 Wiley

ISSN:0730-2312    

DOI:10.1002/jcb.240550310

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1994

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractColony‐stimulating factor‐1 (CSF‐1) is a cytokine required for proliferation, differentiation, activity, and survival of cells of the mononuclear phagocytic system. The growth factor is synthesized as a soluble, matrix, or membrane associated molecule. The specific functions of these forms are not clear. However, some data suggest a dependence of the development of various populations of tissue macrophages on the locally expressed and presented cytokine. Deficiency in CSF‐1, as is the case in the murine mutant strainop/op, results in low numbers of macrophages and monocytes and, most striking, leads to osteopetrosis due to a virtual absence of osteoclasts. Using theop/opmutation as a model, CSF‐1 was established as one of the growth factors for osteoclasts. The expression of CSF‐1 receptors, encoded by the proto‐oncogenec‐fms, by osteoclast precursors and osteoclasts, suggested an effect of this cytokine not only during osteoclast formation but also on the mature cells. In fact, CSF‐1 was shown to inhibit the resorbing activity, to stimulate migration, and to support survival of isolated osteoclasts in vitro. By these actions on cells of the osteoclast lineage, CSF‐1 induces recruitment of new osteoclasts, leading to a net increase of bone resorption, and might govern the spatial distribution of resorption sites within the bone. During these processes, locally expressed and presented forms of the growth factor may play a crucial role, as will be discussed in this article. ©

ISSN:0730-2312    

DOI:10.1002/jcb.240550311

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1994

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractAt first reading the statement “TGFβ stimulates bone formation but inhibits mineralization” may appear to be an oxymoron. However, the bone formation process can take weeks to months to complete, and the unique properties of TGFβ allow this factor to be stored in bone matrix in a latent form, ready to be activated and inactivated at key, pivotal stages in this long process. TGFβ may act to trigger the cascade of events that ultimately leads to new bone formation. However, once this process is initiated, TGFβ must then be inactivated or removed because if present in the later stages of bone formation, mineralization will be inhibited. The unique properties of TGFβ and its role in bone remodeling are the subject of this review. © 1994 Wiley

ISSN:0730-2312    

DOI:10.1002/jcb.240550312

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1994

数据来源: WILEY