摘要:

Population pharmacokinetics (PPK) has evolved from a discipline primarily applied to therapeutic drug monitoring to one that plays a significant role in clinical pharmacology in general and drug development in particular. In February 1999 the US Food and Drug Administration issued a ‘Guidance for Industry: Population Pharmacokinetics’ that sets out the mechanisms and philosophy of PPK and outlines its role in drug development.The application of PPK to the drug development process plays an important role in the efficient development of safe and effective drugs. PPK knowledge is essential for mapping the response surface, explaining subgroup differences, developing and evaluating competing dose administration strategies, and as an aid in designing future studies. The mapping of the response surface is done to maximise the benefit-risk ratio, so that the impact of the input profile and dose magnitude on beneficial and harmful pharmacological effects can be understood and applied to individual patients. PPK combined with simulation methods provides a tool for estimating the expected range of concentrations from competing dose administration strategies. Once extracted, this knowledge can be applied to labelling or used to assess various future study designs.PPK should be implemented across all phases of drug development. For preclinical studies, PPK can be applied to allometric scaling and toxicokinetic analyses, and is useful for determining ‘first time in man’ doses and explaining toxicological results. Phase I studies provide initial understanding of the structural model and the effect of possible covariates, and may later be used to evaluate PPK differences between patients and healthy individuals. Phase II studies provide the greatest opportunity to map the response surface. With these PPK models it is possible to gain an improved understanding of the role of the dose on the response surface and of the range of expected responses. In phase III and IV studies, PPK is implemented to further refine the PPK model and to explain unexpected responses.Planning for the implementation of PPK across all phases of drug development is necessary, as well as planning for individual PPK studies. Planning should include: defining important questions, identifying covariates and drug-drug interactions that need to be investigated, and identifying the applications and intended use of the model(s). The plan for each project must have a strategy for data management, data collection, data quality assurance, staff training for data collection, data analysis and model validation.

ISSN:0312-5963    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:2000

数据来源: ADIS

摘要:

Pravastatin, one of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) widely used in the management of hypercholesterolaemia, has unique pharmacokinetic characteristics among the members of this class. Manyin vivoandin vitrohuman and animal studies suggest that active transport mechanisms are involved in the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin.The oral bioavailability of pravastatin is low because of incomplete absorption and a first-pass effect. The drug is rapidly absorbed from the upper part of the small intestine, probably via proton-coupled carrier-mediated transport, and then taken up by the liver by a sodium-independent bile acid transporter. About half of the pravastatin that reaches the liver via the portal vein is extracted by the liver, and this hepatic extraction is mainly attributed to biliary excretion which is performed by a primary active transport mechanism. The major metabolites are produced by chemical degradation in the stomach rather than by cytochrome P450-dependent metabolism in the liver. The intact drug and its metabolites are cleared through both hepatic and renal routes, and tubular secretion is a predominant mechanism in renal excretion.The dual routes of pravastatin elimination reduce the need for dosage adjustment if the function of either the liver or kidney is impaired, and also reduce the possibility of drug interactions compared with other statins, which are largely eliminated by metabolism. The lower protein binding than other statins weakens the tendency for displacement of highly protein-bound drugs. Although all statins show a hepatoselective disposition, the mechanism for pravastatin is different from that of the others. There is high uptake of pravastatin by the liver via an active transport mechanism, but not by other tissues because of its hydrophilicity, whereas the disposition characteristics of other statins result from high hepatic extraction because of high lipophilicity.These pharmacokinetic properties of pravastatin may be the result of the drug being given in the pharmacologically active open hydroxy acid form and the fact that its hydrophilicity is markedly higher than that of other statins. The nature of the pravastatin transporters, particularly in humans, remains unknown at present. Further mechanistic studies are required to establish the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of pravastatin and to provide the optimal therapeutic efficacy for various types of patients with hypercholesterolaemia.

ISSN:0312-5963    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:2000

数据来源: ADIS

摘要:

Reboxetine is a novel selective norepinephrine inhibitor that has been evaluated in the treatment of patients with depression.Reboxetine is a racemic mixture, and the (S,S)-(+)-enantiomer appears to be the more potent inhibitor. However, the ratio of the areas under the concentration-time curves of the (S,S)-(+)- and (R,R)-(−)-enantiomersin vivois approximately 0.5. There is no evidence for chiral inversion. Differences in the clearances of the 2 enantiomers may be explained by differences in protein binding.The pharmacokinetics of reboxetine are linear following both single and multiple oral doses up to a dosage of 12 mg/day. The plasma concentration-time profile following oral administration is best described by a 1-compartment model, and the mean half-life (approximately 12 hours) is consistent with the recommendation to administer the drug twice daily.Reboxetine is well absorbed after oral administration. The absolute bioavailability is 94.5%, and maximal concentrations are generally achieved within 2 to 4 hours. Food affects the rate, but not the extent, of absorption. The distribution of reboxetine appears to be limited to a fraction of the total body water due to its extensive (>97%) binding to plasma proteins.The primary route of reboxetine elimination appears to be through hepatic metabolism. Less than 10% of the dose is cleared renally. A number of metabolites formed through hepatic oxidation have been identified, but reboxetine is the major circulating species in plasma.In vitrostudies show that reboxetine is predominantly metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4; CYP2D6 is not involved.Reboxetine plasma concentrations are increased in elderly individuals and in those with hepatic or renal dysfunction, probably because of reduced metabolic clearance. In these populations, reboxetine should be used with caution, and a dosage reduction is indicated.Ketoconazole decreases the clearance of reboxetine, so that the dosage of reboxetine may need to be reduced when potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 are coadministered. Quinidine does not affect thein vivoclearance of reboxetine, confirming the lack of involvement of CYP2D6. There is no pharmacokinetic interaction between reboxetine and lorazepam or fluoxetine. Reboxetine at therapeutic concentrations has no effect on thein vitroactivity of CYP1A2, 2C9, 2D6, 2E1 or 3A4. The lack of effect of reboxetine on CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 was confirmed by the lack of effect on the metabolism of dextromethorphan and alprazolam in healthy volunteers. Thus, reboxetine is not likely to affect the clearance of other drugs metabolised by CYP isozymes.

ISSN:0312-5963    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:2000

数据来源: ADIS

摘要:

Raltitrexed is a specific, folate-based inhibitor of thymidylate synthase with activity in advanced colorectal cancer comparable with that of fluorouracil (5-fluorouracil) plus folinic acid. Its activity is enhanced by rapid cellular entry and polyglutamation, with the polyglutamated derivatives having approximately 100-fold greater inhibitory potency than the parent compound.A number of phase I/pharmacokinetic studies have been performed, including schedules involving a 15-minute infusion every 3 weeks, weekly × 6 every 8 weeks, and every 2 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the 3-weekly schedule was 3.5 to 4.5 mg/m2in adults and 6 mg/m2in a paediatric population. The MTDs for the other schedules have not yet been reported.The disposition of raltitrexed in patients is best described by a 3-compartment model with a terminal half-life (t½γ) of 260 hours, the latter being subject to significant interpatient variability. A similar protracted t½γhas been detected in all of the animal species studied. Together with evidence from the mass-balance studies performed, this delayed elimination suggests considerable sequestration of raltitrexed in tissues, predominantly as polyglutamate forms. Nevertheless, there has been no pharmacokinetic evidence of drug accumulation in plasma following repeated administration. On the basis of animal experiments, the oral bioavailability and penetration of raltitrexed into cerebrospinal fluid are both likely to be limited in the clinical setting. Raltitrexed is over 90% bound to plasma protein over the concentration range of 20 to 100 µmol/L. Apart from polyglutamation, raltitrexed does not appear to be metabolised to a significant extent, and most of the excreted drug (approximately 20% of the administered dose) is recovered unchanged in the urine within the first 24 hours post-administration. The average clearance of raltitrexed is 2.4 L/h (40 ml/min), and this value is significantly reduced in patients with compromised renal function (glomerular filtration rate of 25 to 65 ml/min). These patients are more likely to experience severe antiproliferative toxicity with raltitrexed. A careful evaluation of renal function, particularly in the elderly, is warranted.It has not been possible to establish strong correlations between the plasma pharmacokinetics of raltitrexed and toxicity, and the cellular pharmacokinetics of raltitrexed may be more predictive. Studies in mice have demonstrated that delayed administration of folinic acid can assist in the recovery of animals from antiproliferative toxicity, possibly by promoting the release of polyglutamated drug from tissues. This approach should be evaluated as a rescue regimen in patients with severe proliferative toxicity.

ISSN:0312-5963    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:2000

数据来源: ADIS

摘要:

Platelet function tests measure different aspects of platelet function, which include adherence, activation, aggregation and secretion. Clinically, the goal of platelet function testing is to provide information about the platelet contribution to the risk of thrombotic or haemorrhagic events and the optimisation of antiplatelet therapy. The important clinical questions are whether an antiplatelet agent is having the desired effect on platelet inhibition (effectiveness) and whether the patient has sufficient residual platelet function to avoid bleeding (safety).The role of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and thienopyridines is well established in the management of patients with coronary artery disease and in the setting of coronary interventions. The last several years have demonstrated the unequivocal effectiveness of intravenously administered platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists in the management of acute coronary syndromes and in the setting of percutaneous coronary interventions. With the increasing use of these GPIIb/IIIa antagonists, it is becoming more important clinically to measure platelet inhibition with these agents. This paper reviews major techniques and instrumentation for platelet monitoring and discusses the goals of the best method.

ISSN:0312-5963    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:2000

数据来源: ADIS

摘要:

BackgroundFor many racemic drugs, bioequivalence assessment based on isomer-nonspecific assays is appropriate because enantiomeric area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) exposure ratios are close to unity. Use of nonspecific methods in cases in which the ratio is substantially greater or less than 1, however, may obscure real therapeutic differences among formulations, especially if the enantiomers exhibit differing pharmacological potencies.ObjectiveTo examine the influence of absorption rate on etodolac bioequivalence as measured by total [(R,S)-] and (S)-etodolac.DesignSingle dose, 3-period, crossover, pharmacokinetic study in 24 healthy volunteers in which the administration rate of etodolac was varied.MethodsParticipants received etodolac 400mg in solution, given as a single dose over 1 minute or as divided doses over 30 and 90 minutes. Unresolved and enantiomer concentrations of etodolac were measured by a validated HPLC assay. The enantiomer ratio was similarly measured by HPLC.ResultsBioequivalence parameters derived for both unresolved and (S)-etodolac indicate that peak plasma drug concentration (Cmax) was not bioequivalent. By delaying absorption, bioequivalence was lost.ConclusionsCollectively, these data demonstrate that bioequivalence between 2 products of etodolac based on enantiomerically nonspecific criteria alone may not generalise to the pharmacologically relevant (S)-enantiomer. This suggests that enantiospecific assays are necessary for bioequivalence assessments.

ISSN:0312-5963    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:2000

数据来源: ADIS