摘要:

Currently, there is an increasing focus on the implementation of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) studies and modelling as essential tools for drug development. Strategies involving specifically the population approach, which are based on relatively recent statistical methodology (e.g. nonlinear mixed effects modelling, NONMEM) have been advocated for investigating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability as well as dose-concentration-effect relationships. The present article outlines this approach, and discusses how it can be implemented within the framework of the studies currently performed as part of the clinical phases of new drug development. It also considers study design and performance, based on real-life experiences.Population approaches, if designed carefully and early, as part of the planning of the drug development programme, are expected to play a significant role at every phase of the programme and to contribute to providing information that is valuable for registration purposes. Statistical methodology and software are now widely available. However, practical issues such as integration of the population approach within existing protocols, quality control of the data, timing of laboratory and statistical analyses, as well as resource allocation, remain legitimate concerns to be considered in prospective studies.

ISSN:0312-5963    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:1996

数据来源: ADIS

摘要:

Acarbose represents a new pharmacological approach to achieving the metabolic benefits of a slower carbohydrate absorption in diabetes, by acting as a potent, competitive inhibitor of intestinal &agr;-glucosidases. Acarbose molecules attach to the carbohydrate binding sites of &agr;-glucosidases, with an affinity constant that is much higher than that of the normal substrate. Because of the reversible nature of the inhibitor-enzyme interaction, the conversion of oligosaccharides to monosaccharides is only delayed rather than completely blocked. Acarbose has the structural features of a tetrasaccharide and does not cross the enterocytes after ingestion. Thus, its pharmacokinetic properties are well suited to the pharmacological action directed exclusively towards the intestinal glucosidases.The most important clinical consequence of the delayed carbohydrate digestion caused by acarbose is the attenuation of postprandial increases in blood glucose levels. Other effects have also been described: a decreased &bgr;-pancreatic response to meals, and influences on gut hormone secretion and plasma lipid levels. Gastrointestinal discomfort is frequently reported as an adverse effect of acarbose administration, but incidence usually decreases with time.The suitability of acarbose for improving glucose homeostasis as an adjunct to dietary control or to administration of sulphonylureas or insulin has been extensively studied in patients both with type 1 (insulin-dependent) and type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Acarbose can be used as first-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes which is poorly controlled by diet alone. Moreover, the lack of bodyweight gain or hypoglycaemic effects reported during acarbose treatment may be advantageous for obese or elderly patients. Finally, the reduction in fluctuations of glucose levels throughout the day may help to control type 1 diabetes in patients with ‘brittle diabetes’.Long term prospective studies are still needed to confirm these indications and the usefulness of acarbose in conditions other than diabetes, notably reactive hypoglycaemia and dumping syndrome.

ISSN:0312-5963    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:1996

数据来源: ADIS

摘要:

Most experience of the therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive agents has been acquired in the field of solid organ transplantation; however, agents such as cyclosporin (cyclosporin A) are being increasingly utilised for the management of autoimmune diseases.Cyclosporin is the most widely studied immunosuppressant, but in spite of this many controversies still exist as to the optimum strategy for monitoring this drug. Owing to its widely variable pharmacokinetics and metabolism, and the absence of a simple method to measure therapeutic effectiveness, many factors should be considered. In most circumstances, measuring whole blood trough concentrations of cyclosporin with a specific assay methodology is warranted. In addition, knowledge of other factors that may alter the pharmacokinetics (such as liver function, concomitant food or medications, gastrointestinal status, and time since transplantation) should be taken into account so that therapy can be appropriately adjusted. Other methods of monitoring have been investigated, such as AUC (area under the concentration-time curve) monitoring and immunological monitoring. However, further refinement of these techniques and greater experience with their efficacy must be accumulated before their role in the monitoring of cyclosporin can be defined.Tacrolimus, like cyclosporin, shares many of the difficulties in monitoring for efficacy and toxicity due largely to the variable pharmacokinetics; similarly to cyclosporin, whole blood trough concentration monitoring should be utilised in combination with knowledge of the factors that may affect the pharmacokinetics.Muromonab CD3 (OKT3) is a monoclonal antibody used for the treatment and prophylaxis of acute allograft rejection. Several immunological monitoring techniques have been investigated for this agent. Monitoring CD3+ levels can assist clinicians in determining therapeutic efficacy, while measuring antimuromonab CD3 antibody titres can help determine if xenosensitisation has occurred, causing therapeutic ineffectiveness.The clinical monitoring of azathioprine, one of the first immunosuppressive agents used in transplantation, has historically been limited to monitoring complete blood counts for bone marrow suppression. However, newer techniques measuring intracellular DNA nucleotides appear to be promising.The new immunosuppressants on the horizon include mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin. The clinical experience with therapeutic drug monitoring of these 2 compounds is scant in the literature; however, both agents have demonstrated efficacy in preventing or treating allograft rejection while maintaining a relatively well tolerated toxicity profile in recent clinical trials.Routine monitoring does not appear to be warranted for immunosuppressive therapy in autoimmune diseases.

ISSN:0312-5963    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:1996

数据来源: ADIS

摘要:

Since its approval in 1983 for immunosuppressive therapy in patients undergoing organ and bone marrow transplants, cyclosporin has had a major impact on organ transplantation. It has significantly improved 1-year and 2-year graft survival rates, and decreased morbidity in kidney, liver, heart, heart-lung and pancreas transplantation. Several studies have supported the efficacy of cyclosporin in preventing graft-versus-host disease in bone marrow transplantation. Cyclosporin is also possibly effective in treating diseases of autoimmune origin and as an antineoplastic agent.The introduction of therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporin was extremely useful because of the wide inter- and intraindividual variability in the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin after oral or intravenous administration. Optimal long term use of cyclosporin requires careful monitoring of the blood (or plasma) concentrations.Sustained and clinically significant drug-drug interactions can occur during long term therapy with cyclosporin. The coadministration of multiple drugs with cyclosporin could result in graft rejection, renal dysfunction or other undesirable effects. Any interaction that leads to modified cyclosporin concentrations is of potential clinical importance.Cyclosporin itself may have significant effects on the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of coadministered drugs, such as digoxin, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and antineoplastic drugs affected by multidrug resistance.Many drugs have been shown to affect the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of cyclosporin. Interactions between cyclosporin and danazol, diltiazem, erythromycin, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, metoclopramide, nicardipine, verapamil, carbamazepine, phenobarbital (phenobarbitone), phenytoin, rifampicin (rifampin) and cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) are well documented in a large number of patients. Other interactions (such as those with aciclovir, estradiol and imipenem) are documented only in isolated case studies.

ISSN:0312-5963    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:1996

数据来源: ADIS

ISSN:0312-5963    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:1996

数据来源: ADIS