|
1. |
Migraine During PregnancyOptions for Therapy |
|
CNS Drugs,
Volume 19,
Issue 6,
2005,
Page 465-481
Anthony W Fox,
Merle L Diamond,
Egilius L H Spierings,
Preview
|
PDF (264KB)
|
|
摘要:
Migraine is common during pregnancy, but fortunately this combination of conditions obviously exists for only a finite period. The greatest frequency of migraine attacks occurs during the first trimester. Accurate diagnosis is asine qua nonin this setting as in any headache patient. It is in the first trimester that the fetus is at greatest risk from abortifacient and teratogenic drugs, and when very early pregnancy may be undiagnosed. Ergot alkaloids (including methysergide) should be avoided during pregnancy because of their teratogenicity, and most other drug classes should be used only when unavoidable. The use of prophylactic agents during pregnancy should be the exception, not the rule, and preferably only during the second and third trimesters; propranolol is probably safest in this situation.De novoheadache during pregnancy usually requires expert review of the patient. Treatment tactics for uncomplicated migraine in pregnancy depend on the concurrent clinical situation. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is the mainstay for the patient whose typical attacks continue into the first trimester. If paracetamol is insufficient, then partial agonist opioids may be used if typical migraine attacks persist in the second and third trimesters (which is uncommon). ‘Chronic migraine’ in pregnancy, i.e. ≥15 headache days per month, is rare, and is the greatest therapeutic challenge. Co-morbidities such as depression or epilepsy require specialised approaches. The complexities associated with these tactics are discussed in this article, and it is emphasised that none has the specific approval of regulatory authorities. Heightened pharmacovigilance will better inform the future pregnant migraineur. However, this type of information is less likely to be available for novel classes of neuropharmacological agents than for existing ones.
ISSN:1172-7047
出版商:ADIS
年代:2005
数据来源: ADIS
|
2. |
Medication Overuse Headache in Patients with Primary Headache DisordersEpidemiology, Management and Pathogenesis |
|
CNS Drugs,
Volume 19,
Issue 6,
2005,
Page 483-497
Andrew J Dowson,
David W Dodick,
Volker Limmroth,
Preview
|
PDF (226KB)
|
|
摘要:
Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a common medical condition that is associated with considerable long-term morbidity and disability. Patients experiencing MOH have primary headache disorders (migraine, tension-type headache [TTH] or the combination of migraine and TTH) that change to a pattern of daily or near-daily headaches over a period of years or decades following the overuse of symptomatic headache medications. Overused drugs include analgesics, ergot alkaloids, serotonin 5-HT1B/1Dreceptor agonists (‘triptans’) and medications containing barbiturates, codeine, caffeine, tranquillisers and mixed analgesics. Affected patients usually have a long history of primary headache, overuse of medications and MOH before they consult a physician for care. Patients with MOH are usually managed in specialist centres by withdrawal of the overused drugs and treatment of withdrawal symptoms (on an inpatient or outpatient basis), headache prophylaxis and limited use of symptomatic acute medications. Most patients respond to this therapy, although the prognosis is not always good and ≥50% may lapse over an initial 5-year follow-up period. The best practical strategy at present is to prevent the overuse of drugs in the first place by patient education and formal management approaches conducted in primary care to treat the primary headache before it changes to MOH. The quality of the clinical evidence on MOH is suboptimal and further biological and clinical research is urgently required to help facilitate the management of these patients more effectively in the future.
ISSN:1172-7047
出版商:ADIS
年代:2005
数据来源: ADIS
|
3. |
Efficacy of Olanzapine and Ziprasidone for the Treatment of SchizophreniaA Systematic Review |
|
CNS Drugs,
Volume 19,
Issue 6,
2005,
Page 499-515
Louis S Matza,
Timothy M Baker,
Dennis A Revicki,
Preview
|
PDF (293KB)
|
|
摘要:
It is difficult to determine the relative efficacy of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia, based on the available literature. The purpose of this article is to review and compare the efficacy of two atypical antipsychotics: olanzapine and ziprasidone.This review focused on randomised trials in which these two antipsychotics were compared with placebo, conventional antipsychotics and each other. Common efficacy measures were the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Schedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms. When sufficient data were available, the mean treatment effect (with 95% confidence intervals) was computed and presented.Olanzapine was consistently found to be significantly superior to placebo and comparable with, or superior to, haloperidol for the treatment of overall, positive and negative schizophrenic symptoms. Ziprasidone appears to have significantly greater efficacy than placebo for overall and negative symptoms, but it remains uncertain whether ziprasidone is comparable in efficacy with conventional antipsychotics such as haloperidol. Two unpublished clinical trials have directly compared olanzapine and ziprasidone. One of these trials found no significant efficacy differences between the two drugs, whereas the results of the other study favoured olanzapine.Compared with ziprasidone, olanzapine has a larger body of evidence supporting its efficacy, and a greater proportion of findings for olanzapine have been published, allowing for greater scrutiny of results. Both drugs appear to be superior to placebo for the treatment of overall and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, but olanzapine generally compares more favourably with conventional antipsychotics. Firm conclusions regarding the comparison between olanzapine and ziprasidone require additional published trials on ziprasidone, particularly in direct comparison with olanzapine.
ISSN:1172-7047
出版商:ADIS
年代:2005
数据来源: ADIS
|
4. |
Neuroprotective and Abstinence-Promoting Effects of AcamprosateElucidating the Mechanism of Action |
|
CNS Drugs,
Volume 19,
Issue 6,
2005,
Page 517-537
Philippe De Witte,
John Littleton,
Philippe Parot,
George Koob,
Preview
|
PDF (380KB)
|
|
摘要:
Acamprosate is an abstinence-promoting drug widely used in the treatment of alcohol dependence but which has a mechanism of action that has remained obscure for many years. Recently, evidence has emerged that this drug may interact with excitatory glutamatergic neurotransmission in general and as an antagonist of the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5) in particular. These findings provide, for the first time, a satisfactory, unifying hypothesis that can bring together and explain the diverse neurochemical effects of acamprosate. Glutamic acid is involved in several aspects of alcohol dependence and withdrawal, many of which can be modified by acamprosate. For example, during chronic exposure to alcohol, the glutamatergic system becomes upregulated, leaving the brain exposed to excessive glutamatergic activity when alcohol is abruptly withdrawn. The surge in glutamic acid release that occurs following alcohol withdrawal can be attenuated by acamprosate. The elevated extracellular levels of glutamic acid observed in withdrawal, together with supersensitivity of NMDA receptors, may expose vulnerable neurons to excitotoxicity, possibly contributing to the neuronal loss sometimes observed in chronic alcohol dependence.In vitrostudies suggest that the excitotoxicity produced by ethanol can effectively be blocked by acamprosate. Moreover, glutamatergic neurotransmission plays an important role in the acquisition of cue-elicited drinking behaviours, which again can be modulated by acamprosate. In conclusion, the glutamatergic hypothesis of the mechanism of action of acamprosate helps explain many of its effects in human alcohol dependence and points the way to potential new activities, such as neuroprotection, that merit exploration in the clinic.
ISSN:1172-7047
出版商:ADIS
年代:2005
数据来源: ADIS
|
5. |
Thrombolysis in Acute Ischaemic StrokeA Guide to Patient Selection |
|
CNS Drugs,
Volume 19,
Issue 6,
2005,
Page 539-551
Richard I Lindley,
Preview
|
PDF (266KB)
|
|
摘要:
Thrombolysis should be a routine treatment for selected patients with acute ischaemic stroke and shows promise in a much larger group of patients. This recommendation is based on data from two completed meta-analyses: the Cochrane Library and the rt-PA Study Group individual patient meta-analysis. In patients with ischaemic stroke, treatment with alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; rt-PA) is associated with a non-significant excess of deaths, equivalent to about 19 extra deaths per 1000 treated. Furthermore, thrombolysis, regardless of which drug is used, definitely increases the odds of fatal intracranial haemorrhage by 4-fold. However, despite these risks, thrombolysis with alteplase reduces the odds of death or disability, with the benefit being equivalent to about 55 extra independent survivors per 1000 treated. Unfortunately, there are currently too few data to provide a comprehensive guide to patient selection. The available data suggest that younger patients (<80 years of age) who can be treated with alteplase within 3 hours of stroke onset have the most to gain, equivalent to about 100 more independent survivors per 1000 treated. The role of thrombolysis beyond 3 hours, in those with more extensive CT scan ischaemic change, and patients >80 years of age needs further evaluation. In summary, thrombolysis with alteplase is now an established treatment for acute ischaemic stroke, but clinicians need to cooperate in terms of enrolling more patients in further trials if we are to get the most out of this important treatment.
ISSN:1172-7047
出版商:ADIS
年代:2005
数据来源: ADIS
|
6. |
Spotlight on Olanzapine in Bipolar I Disorder1 |
|
CNS Drugs,
Volume 19,
Issue 6,
2005,
Page 553-555
Paul L McCormack,
Lynda R Wiseman,
Preview
|
PDF (176KB)
|
|
摘要:
Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that is approved in the US and Europe for the oral treatment of acute manic episodes in patients with bipolar I disorder and for maintenance therapy to prevent recurrence in responders.Oral olanzapine is effective in the treatment of bipolar mania, both as single agent therapy and as adjunctive therapy in combination with lithium or valproate semisodium. In the treatment of acute episodes, olanzapine is superior to placebo and at least as effective as lithium, valproate semisodium, haloperidol and risperidone in reducing the symptoms of mania and inducing remission. Additional comparative studies are required to determine the efficacy of olanzapine relative to newer atypical antipsychotics such as quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole. Olanzapine is also effective at delaying or preventing relapse during long-term maintenance therapy in treatment responders and is currently the only atypical antipsychotic approved for this indication. Current evidence suggests that olanzapine may be more effective than lithium in preventing relapse into mania, but not relapse into depression or relapse overall. Olanzapine is generally well tolerated and, although it is associated with a higher incidence of weight gain than most atypical agents, it has a low incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms. Therefore, oral olanzapine is a useful first-line or adjunctive agent for both the acute treatment of manic episodes and the long-term prevention of relapse into manic, depressive or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder.
ISSN:1172-7047
出版商:ADIS
年代:2005
数据来源: ADIS
|
|