摘要:

Various forms of nicotine replacement therapy and bupropion have been found to be efficacious and well tolerated for treating patients dependent on tobacco. However, the currently recommended duration of treatment with pharmacotherapy may be insufficient for some smokers to achieve sustained abstinence from tobacco. Extending the use of pharmacotherapy beyond the recommended timeframe may be an effective strategy for helping tobacco users achieve abstinence and for preventing relapse to tobacco use, especially among those who are highly dependent and those who are concerned about bodyweight gain following cessation.Several studies have reported on long-term use of various pharmacotherapies. These studies have demonstrated that such long-term use is not harmful. Moreover, compared with continued smoking, long-term use of pharmacotherapy exposes patients to relatively small amounts of nicotine and none of the cancer-causing chemicals found in cigarettes and other tobacco products. However, more research is needed to further clarify questions regarding the ideal duration of therapy. Two questions have yet to be answered: In what populations of smokers is long-term therapy an effective strategy for achieving abstinence and preventing relapse? Does wider availability of nicotine replacement therapy lead to initiation of nicotine addiction by children and others not using tobacco products? Also, as with all medications, additional documentation of the safety of prolonged use of pharmacotherapy is important.The aim of this review is to present the current evidence supporting the notion that long-term therapy for treating tobacco dependence may be appropriately considered for some tobacco users.

ISSN:1172-7047    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:2002

数据来源: ADIS

摘要:

Clinically relevant movement disorders are identified in 3% of patients with HIV infection seen at tertiary referral centres. In the same setting, prospective follow-up shows that 50% of patients with AIDS develop tremor, parkinsonism or other extrapyramidal features. Hemiballism-hemichorea and tremor are the most common hyperkinesias seen in patients who are HIV positive, but other movement disorders diagnosed in these patients include dystonia, chorea, myoclonus, tics, paroxysmal dyskinesias and parkinsonism. Patients with movement disorders usually present with other clinical features such as peripheral neuropathy, seizures, myelopathy and dementia.In the vast majority of patients, hyperkinesias result from lesions caused by opportunistic infections, particularly toxoplasmosis, which damage the basal ganglia connections. On the other hand, parkinsonism and tremor can result from dopaminergic dysfunction resulting from HIV itself or the use of antidopaminergic drugs.The management of patients who are HIV positive who present with movement disorders involves recognition and treatment of opportunistic infections, symptomatic treatment of the movement disorder and the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The most effective treatment of cerebral toxoplasmosis in patients with HIV infection is the combination of sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine. Symptomatic treatment of the movement disorder is often disappointing: hemiballism improves with antipsychotics, but tremor, parkinsonism and other phenomena usually fail to respond to available therapies. Preliminary data suggest that HAART may be helpful in the symptomatic control as well as prevention of movement disorders in patients who are HIV positive.

ISSN:1172-7047    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:2002

数据来源: ADIS

摘要:

Since its first marketing as an antiepileptic drug (AED) 35 years ago in France, valproate has become established worldwide as one of the most widely used AEDs in the treatment of both generalised and partial seizures in adults and children. The broad spectrum of antiepileptic efficacy of valproate is reflected in preclinicalin vivoandin vitromodels, including a variety of animal models of seizures or epilepsy.There is no single mechanism of action of valproate that can completely account for the numerous effects of the drug on neuronal tissue and its broad clinical activity in epilepsy and other brain diseases. In view of the diverse molecular and cellular events that underlie different seizure types, the combination of several neurochemical and neurophysiological mechanisms in a single drug molecule might explain the broad antiepileptic efficacy of valproate. Furthermore, by acting on diverse regional targets thought to be involved in the generation and propagation of seizures, valproate may antagonise epileptic activity at several steps of its organisation.There is now ample experimental evidence that valproate increases turnover of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and thereby potentiates GABAergic functions in some specific brain regions thought to be involved in the control of seizure generation and propagation. Furthermore, the effect of valproate on neuronal excitation mediated by theN-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) subtype of glutamate receptors might be important for its anticonvulsant effects. Acting to alter the balance of inhibition and excitation through multiple mechanisms is clearly an advantage for valproate and probably contributes to its broad spectrum of clinical effects.Although the GABAergic potentiation and glutamate/NMDA inhibition could be a likely explanation for the anticonvulsant action on focal and generalised convulsive seizures, they do not explain the effect of valproate on nonconvulsive seizures, such as absences. In this respect, the reduction of γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) release reported for valproate could be of interest, because GHB has been suggested to play a critical role in the modulation of absence seizures.Although it is often proposed that blockade of voltage-dependent sodium currents is an important mechanism of antiepileptic action of valproate, the exact role played by this mechanism of action at therapeutically relevant concentrations in the mammalian brain is not clearly elucidated.By the experimental observations summarised in this review, most clinical effects of valproate can be explained, although much remains to be learned at a number of different levels about the mechanisms of action of valproate. In view of the advances in molecular neurobiology and neuroscience, future studies will undoubtedly further our understanding of the mechanisms of action of valproate.

ISSN:1172-7047    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:2002

数据来源: ADIS

摘要:

Thirty-five years since its introduction into clinical use, valproate (valproic acid) has become the most widely prescribed antiepileptic drug (AED) worldwide. Its pharmacological effects involve a variety of mechanisms, including increased γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)−ergic transmission, reduced release and/or effects of excitatory amino acids, blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels and modulation of dopaminergic and serotoninergic transmission.Valproate is available in different dosage forms for parenteral and oral use. All available oral formulations are almost completely bioavailable, but they differ in dissolution characteristics and absorption rates. In particular, sustained-release formulations are available that minimise fluctuations in serum drug concentrations during a dosing interval and can therefore be given once or twice daily.Valproic acid is about 90% bound to plasma proteins, and the degree of binding decreases with increasing drug concentration within the clinically occurring range. Valproic acid is extensively metabolised by microsomal glucuronide conjugation, mitochondrial β-oxidation and cytochrome P450−dependent ω-, (ω-1)− and (ω-2)−oxidation. The elimination half-life is in the order of 9 to 18 hours, but shorter values (5 to 12 hours) are observed in patients comedicated with enzyme-inducing agents such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and barbiturates. Valproate itself is devoid of enzyme-inducing properties, but it has the potential of inhibiting drug metabolism and can increase by this mechanism the plasma concentrations of certain coadministered drugs, including phenobarbital (phenobarbitone), lamotrigine and zidovudine.Valproate is a broad spectrum AED, being effective against all seizure types. In patients with newly diagnosed partial seizures (with or without secondary generalisation) and/or primarily generalised tonic-clonic seizures, the efficacy of valproate is comparable to that of phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital, although in most comparative trials the tolerability of phenobarbital was inferior to that of the other drugs. Valproate is generally regarded as a first-choice agent for most forms of idiopathic and symptomatic generalised epilepsies. Many of these syndromes are associated with multiple seizure types, including tonic-clonic, myoclonic and absence seizures, and prescription of a broad-spectrum drug such as valproate has clear advantages in this situation. A number of reports have also suggested that intravenous valproate could be of value in the treatment of convulsive and nonconvulsive status epilepticus, but further studies are required to establish in more detail the role of the drug in this indication.The most commonly reported adverse effects of valproate include gastrointestinal disturbances, tremor and bodyweight gain. Other notable adverse effects include encephalopathy symptoms (at times associated with hyperammonaemia), platelet disorders, pancreatitis, liver toxicity (with an overall incidence of 1 in 20 000, but a frequency as high as 1 in 600 or 1 in 800 in high-risk groups such as infants below 2 years of age receiving anticonvulsant polytherapy) and teratogenicity, including a 1 to 3% risk of neural tube defects. Some studies have also suggested that menstrual disorders and certain clinical, ultrasound or endocrine manifestations of reproductive system disorders, including polycystic ovary syndrome, may be more common in women treated with valproate than in those treated with other AEDs. However, the precise relevance of the latter findings remains to be evaluated in large, prospective, randomised studies.

ISSN:1172-7047    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:2002

数据来源: ADIS

摘要:

Rizatriptan is an orally active serotonin 5-HT1receptor agonist that potently and selectively binds to 5-HT1B/1Dsubtypes.Earlier clinical trials demonstrated that rizatriptan 5 or 10mg is more effective than placebo at providing pain relief and a pain-free state, relieving associated symptoms of migraine, normalising functional ability and improving patient quality of life, and showed that rizatriptan provides faster freedom from pain and reduces nausea to a greater extent than oral sumatriptan.More recently, rizatriptan 10mg was shown to be more effective than zolmitriptan 2.5mg or naratriptan 2.5mg at producing a pain-free state 2 hours postdose. Furthermore, compared with naratriptan, significantly more patients who received rizatriptan were pain free or had pain relief from 1 hour onwards. The number of patients with normal functional ability at 2 hours was significantly higher after rizatriptan than after naratriptan or zolmitriptan. Rizatriptan was also generally more effective than zolmitriptan or naratriptan at relieving migraine-associated symptoms.Rizatriptan is generally well tolerated, and adverse events are usually mild and transient. The most common adverse events associated with rizatriptan in recent randomised trials were asthenia/fatigue, dizziness, somnolence and nausea. There was a trend towards a lower incidence of adverse events with rizatriptan compared with zolmitriptan (31.2vs38.8%). However, rizatriptan was associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse events than naratriptan (39vs29%). The incidence of chest pain was similar after the administration of rizatriptan, zolmitriptan or naratriptan (2−4%).In conclusion, rizatriptan is an effective drug for the acute treatment of moderate or severe migraine. Oral rizatriptan 5 and 10mg have shown greater efficacy than placebo in providing pain relief, an absence of pain, relief from associated symptoms, normal functional ability and an improvement in patient quality of life. Earlier results showed that rizatriptan provides faster freedom from pain and reduces nausea to a greater extent than oral sumatriptan. More recent studies have shown that rizatriptan 10mg provides faster pain relief and a higher percentage of patients with an absence of pain and normal functional ability at 2 hours than naratriptan 2.5mg or zolmitriptan 2.5mg. The efficacy of rizatriptan is retained when used in the long term, and the drug is generally well tolerated. Although well designed studies comparing rizatriptan with almotriptan, eletriptan and frovatriptan would further define the position of rizatriptan, current data suggest that rizatriptan should be considered as a first-line treatment option in the management of migraine.

ISSN:1172-7047    

出版商:ADIS    

年代:2002

数据来源: ADIS