|
1. |
Markov analysis of qualitative dynamics1 |
|
Computational Intelligence,
Volume 7,
Issue 1,
1991,
Page 1-10
JON DOYLE,
ELISHA P. SACKS,
Preview
|
PDF (1127KB)
|
|
摘要:
Common sense sometimes predicts events to be likely or unlikely rather than merely possible. We extend methods of qualitative reasoning to predict the relative likelihoods of possible qualitative behaviors by viewing the dynamics of a system as a Markov chain over its transition graph. This involves adding qualitative or quantitative estimates of transition probabilities to each of the transitions and applying the standard theory of Markov chains to distinguish persistent states from transient states and to calculate recurrence times, settling times, and probabilities for ending up in each state. Much of the analysis depends solely on qualitative estimates of transition probabilities, which follow directly from theoretical considerations and which lead to qualitative predictions about entire classes of systems. Quantitative estimates for specific systems are derived empirically and lead to qualitative and quantitative conclusions, most of which are insensitive to small perturbations in the estimated transition probabilities. The algorithms are straightforward and efficient.
ISSN:0824-7935
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8640.1991.tb00330.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1991
数据来源: WILEY
|
2. |
Using crucial literals to select better theories |
|
Computational Intelligence,
Volume 7,
Issue 1,
1991,
Page 11-22
ABDUL SATTAR,
RandY GOEBEL,
Preview
|
PDF (1306KB)
|
|
摘要:
When Horn clause theories are combined with integrity constraints to produce potentially refutable theories, Seki and Takeuchi have shown howcrucial literalscan be used to discriminate two mutually incompatible theories. A literal iscrucialwith respect to two theories if only one of the two theories supports the derivation of that literal. In other words, actually determining the truth value of the crucial literal will refute one of the two incompatible theories.This paper presents an integration of the idea of crucial literal with Theorist, a logic‐based system for hypothetical reasoning. Theorist is a goal‐directed nonmonotonic reasoning system that classifies logical formulas as possible hypotheses, facts, and observations. As Theorist uses full clausal logic, it does not require Seki and Takeuchi's notion of integrity constraint to define refutable theories. In attempting to deduce observation sentences, Theorist identifies instances of possible hypotheses as nomological explanations: consistent sets of hypothesis instances required to deduce observations. As multiple and mutually incompatible explanations are possible, the notion of crucial literal provides the basis for proposing experiments that distinguish competing explanations.We attempt to make three contributions. First, we adapt Seki and Takeuchi's method for Theorist. To do so, we incrementally use crucial literals as experiments, whose results are used to reduce the total number of explanations generated for a given set of observations. Next, we specify an extension which incrementally constructs a table of all possible crucial literals for any pair of theories. This extension is more efficient and provides the user with greater opportunity to conduct experiments to eliminatefalsifiabletheories. A prototype is implemented in CProlog, and several examples of diagnosis are considered to show its empirical efficiency. Finally, we point out that assumption‐based truth maintenance systems (ATMS), as used in the multiple fault diagnosis system of de Kleer and Williams, are interesting special cases of this more general method of distinguishing explanatory the
ISSN:0824-7935
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8640.1991.tb00331.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1991
数据来源: WILEY
|
3. |
Denkprothesen: on programs that reason |
|
Computational Intelligence,
Volume 7,
Issue 1,
1991,
Page 23-38
MICHAEL W. DWYER,
Preview
|
PDF (1974KB)
|
|
摘要:
This paper considers computer programs that purport to do inference. It finds the essence of their reasoning ability to reside in a particular relationship which exists between the computations described by the texts of those programs and machine‐independent formal representations of the theories in which they are said to reason. The principal novelties in the treatment of this question are the use of explicit “abstraction functions” between states of a computation and sets of sentences of a theory, and the notion of global “inference relations” which characterize the set of all inferences of which a system is capable. The central result of the paper is an “arrow‐theoretic” characterization of the concept of a knowledge representation, along with the related concept of a knowledge representation realization. The notions of equivalence and subsumption for knowledge representations are defined, as well as equivalence of knowledge representation realizations. Finally, important issues of expression evaluation and control are addressed. The paper concludes with a slogan: “The AI is in the arrows.”Cet article traite des programmes informatiques qui prétendent faire de ľinférence. Ľauteur constate que ľessentiel de leur capacityé de raisonnement réside dans la relation particulière qui existe entre les calculs décrits par les textes de ces programmes et les représentations formelles non liées à un type de machine des théories dans le cadre desquelles ils sont supposés raisonner. Les principales nouveautés dans le traitement de cette question sont ľutilisation de fonctions ?abstraction explicites éntre les etats ?un calcul et les ensembles de phrases ?une théorie, et la notion de relations ?inférence globales qui caractérisent ľensemble de toutes les inférences dont un système est capable. Le principal résultat de cet article est une caractérisation du concept de la représentation des connaissances, ainsi que du concept connexe de la réalisation de la représentation des connaissances. Les notions ?équivalence et de sous‐somption pour la représentation des connaissances sont définies, ainsi que ľéquivalence des réalisations de la représentation des connaissances. Enfin, des questions importantes comme ľanalyse
ISSN:0824-7935
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8640.1991.tb00332.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1991
数据来源: WILEY
|
4. |
Egomotion perception using visual tracking |
|
Computational Intelligence,
Volume 7,
Issue 1,
1991,
Page 39-47
AMIT BANDOPADHAY,
DANA H. BALLARD,
Preview
|
PDF (948KB)
|
|
摘要:
The ability of a biological organism to visually track a perceptually significant feature in its environment has been argued to be an important feedback mechanism guiding locomotion. This paper analyzes the constraints available from the visual motion stimuli in the context of tracking. Our aim is to show that the act of tracking simplifies the decoding of egomotion parameters from motion stimuli. The constraints obtainable under tracking are utilized to analyze a possible egomotion decoding strategy for a binocular robot eye system, modeled after the human ocular tracking (smooth pursuit) mechanism. The main result of the paper is in the derivation of a closed‐form solution of the egomotion parameters using feedback information concerning the movement of the tracking motors over time. The theoretical results are verified by experiments. We believe that the active tracking approach presented here is a more simple, practical, and manageable technique in a robot navigation setting, compared to passive method
ISSN:0824-7935
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8640.1991.tb00333.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1991
数据来源: WILEY
|
5. |
The NIKL experience1 |
|
Computational Intelligence,
Volume 7,
Issue 1,
1991,
Page 48-70
JAMES G. SCHMOLZE,
WILLIAM S. MARK,
Preview
|
PDF (2422KB)
|
|
摘要:
NIKL was the successor to KL‐ONE, the first knowledge representation system to implement “term subsumption” semantics. The primary goals for NIKL were to improve the expressivity and efficiency of KL‐ONE. In the process of developing and using NIKL as the primary representational vehicle for several applications, important new representational needs were identified and addressed, and issues both theoretical and practical in knowledge representation were formulated. In this paper, we present the core of NIKL by way of description, examples, and a model theoretic semantics. We describe the motivations behind the major NIKL design decisions, and discuss NIKL'S capabilities and limitations as a working representation
ISSN:0824-7935
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8640.1991.tb00334.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1991
数据来源: WILEY
|
|