Seminars in Dialysis


ISSN: 0894-0959        年代:1992
当前卷期:Volume 5  issue 3     [ 查看所有卷期 ]

年代:1992
 
     Volume 5  issue 1   
     Volume 5  issue 2   
     Volume 5  issue 3
     Volume 5  issue 4   
1. Editor's Notes
  Seminars in Dialysis,   Volume  5,   Issue  3,   1992,   Page  168-168

Richard A. Sherman,  

Preview   |   PDF (92KB)

2. Hemodialysis Citations
  Seminars in Dialysis,   Volume  5,   Issue  3,   1992,   Page  170-174

Preview   |   PDF (542KB)

3. Current Controversies in Peritoneal Dialysis
  Seminars in Dialysis,   Volume  5,   Issue  3,   1992,   Page  175-175

José A. Diaz‐Buxo,  

Preview   |   PDF (56KB)

4. Is CAPD or Hemodialysis Better for Diabetic Patients?
  Seminars in Dialysis,   Volume  5,   Issue  3,   1992,   Page  176-181

Eli A. Friedman,  

Preview   |   PDF (701KB)

5. CAPD Is More Advantageous
  Seminars in Dialysis,   Volume  5,   Issue  3,   1992,   Page  181-188

Zheng‐Yi Yuan,   Elias Balaskas,   Amit Gupta,   Joanne M. Bargman,   Dimitrios G. Oreopoulos,  

Preview   |   PDF (930KB)

6. Is Urea Kinetic Modeling the Best Measure of Adequacy in CAPD?
  Seminars in Dialysis,   Volume  5,   Issue  3,   1992,   Page  189-192

Brendan P. Teehan,   Charles R. Schleifer,   Joan Brown,  

Preview   |   PDF (398KB)

7. Urea Kinetic Modeling Is of No Proven Benefit
  Seminars in Dialysis,   Volume  5,   Issue  3,   1992,   Page  193-196

Peter G. Blake,  

Preview   |   PDF (508KB)

8. A Break‐in Period is Recommended
  Seminars in Dialysis,   Volume  5,   Issue  3,   1992,   Page  197-199

Ramesh Khanna,  

Preview   |   PDF (338KB)

9. A Break‐in Period Is Unnecessary
  Seminars in Dialysis,   Volume  5,   Issue  3,   1992,   Page  199-201

Stephen R. Ash,  

Preview   |   PDF (375KB)

10. Some of the New Catheters Are Better
  Seminars in Dialysis,   Volume  5,   Issue  3,   1992,   Page  202-204

Cosme Cruz,  

Preview   |   PDF (336KB)

首页 上一页 下一页 尾页 第1页 共25条