ISSN:0021-8774    

DOI:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1995.00277.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0021-8774    

DOI:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1995.00281.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0021-8774    

DOI:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1995.00291.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

Jung apparently had learned Enghsh by the time he went to the Burgholzli Clinic, in 1900. There he worked with American and British psychiatrists, wrote papers in Enghsh, and treated his first American analysands. Through one of these, Medill McCormick, Jung came to know influential Americans and his curiosity about the United States grew. In 1909, he first visited the States, along with Freud, and by the time of their break Jung had established ‘firm atfinities’ with America. His relations with Great Britain took root about then. The first Jungian group was formed under the leadership of Constance Long, who was effective also in organizing American Jungians. After the Great War, Jung fiequently visited England to lecture and lead seminars arranged by H. G. Baynes and M. Esther Harding. He travelled to the American Southwest, East Afiica, and India in the company of American and Enghsh fiiends. After World War 11, Jung's association with Mary and Paul Mellon's Bollingen Foundation and the publishers Routledge and Kegan Paul led to the joint project of theCollected Works. In 1976, fifieen years after Jung's death, the twentieth and final volume appeared, and work on editions of Jung's letters, interviews, and seminars, also under American and British auspices, was well advan

ISSN:0021-8774    

DOI:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1995.00301.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

The institutionalizing of analytical psychology in the United Kingdom has its origins in the Analytical Psychology Club founded on 15 September 1922. It became increasingly apparent that professionalization of the Jungian movement was essential and this led to the formation of the Society of Analytical Psychology in 1946. This was followed in 1951 by the founding of the British Association of Psychotherapists. The Association of Jungian Analysts split off from the Society of Analytical Psychology in 1975–6, and this was followed in 1982 by the split between the Association of Jungian Analysts and the Independent Group of Analytical Psychologists. The Berlin Congress of 1986 saw the beginnings of a liaison body for the four London societies, which came to be called the Umbrella Group. This has organized joint conferences and workshops, but the split in 1992 between the United Kingdom Council for Psychotherapy and the British Confederation of Psychotherapists has posed a new threat to the growing harmony between the London societies. In the face of this threat, the Umbrella Group has not been able to articulate a common policy and strategy about the Jungian presence in the United Kingdo

ISSN:0021-8774    

DOI:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1995.00327.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

This non‐clinical paper consists of the author's subjective and personal value judgements on theory and practice. He discusses nine topics: I) What is analysis and why do people seek therapy? 2) Dangers of reification and hypostatizing: reinforcement of narcissistic defences and schizoid unrelatedness. 3) The problems of archetypal psychology and amplification. 4) The cultural and political aspects of the unconscious psyche, and the value of studying the philosophical background to the psychodynamic approach. 5) Criticism of the classical Jungian over‐emphasis of the intrapsychic at the expense of the interpersonal. 6) Psychosomatic healing through experience and interpretation of psychosomatic identity in the transference/countertrans‐ference; idea of the ‘animating body’. 7) Dangers of theoretical hndamentalism and crusading among Jungian schools: envy and intolerance. 8) The need for the analyst to have enough good objects. 9) An acknowledgement of theoretical influences other than Jung on the author's practice; although Jung's ideas facilitate a personal pluralism ‐ the spi

ISSN:0021-8774    

DOI:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1995.00343.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

Impressive reaffirmation of Jung's archetypal hypothesis has come from developments in behavioural biology (Tinbergen 1951; Cosmides 1985), psycholinguistics (Chomsky 1965), structural anthropology (Lévi‐Strauss 1967), developmental psychology (Bowlby 1969), dream research (Jouvet 1975). neuroscience (MacLean 1976), sociobiology (Wilson 1978), and evolutionary psychiatry (Gardner 1988; Gilbert 1989). A close correspondence exists between Jungian theories of dreaming in human beings and modern biological theories of dreaming in animals. A paradigm shift is under way in the direction of a growing cross‐disciplinary awareness that all human sciences are about archetypal manifestations and that these apply as much to the body as to the mind. Jungian psychology must keep abreast of these developments if it is not to be sidelined and superseded by less humane therapeutic philosop

ISSN:0021-8774    

DOI:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1995.00353.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

This article tries to show howVII Sermones ad Mortuoswere for Jung a pivotal text, leading him to a radical self‐transformation. By venturing to allow the unknown to occur, Jung permitted the emergence of an organizing principle and also the evolution within himself of what was to come: a man, an oeuvre, a therapeutic method. This turning point, representing an epistemological fracture, is a crucial moment in Jung's life: the letting go of a paternal imago which imprisoned him, paved the way for a decisive transition to the symbolic functio

ISSN:0021-8774    

DOI:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1995.00365.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

The case histories written by C. G. Jung, from his 1902 Doctoral Dissertation to his 1950 case of Miss X, are evaluated as pieces of evidence in support of his theories. Evidence is shown to rely for its validity on an ‘evidential context’ which has altered over time. Jung's case histories change over the course of his writings and become more like stories. The reason for this difference is his move from an interpretative schema based on the natural sciences when a psychiatrist, through that of psychoanalysis, to one based on the human sciences, and in particular to one based on hermeneutics ‐ the study of interpretation and meaning ‐ when he developed his theory of analytical psychology. Jung moves from a form of hermeneutics based on what constitutes a ‘valid’ interpretation to one that concentrates on meaning and understanding. In writing his later case histories like stories, Jung is using them as merely part of the wider cultural context of evidence required by analytical psychology rather than as privileged pieces of evidence in

ISSN:0021-8774    

DOI:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1995.00383.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

The construction of narrative is closely linked to identity formation, or the establishment of a sense of self, with its attendant notions of history and continuity and lineal development. Story‐making within analysis is seen as being at the heart of symbolic process and of psychic change. The story serves as a form of transitional object combining factual with imaginal, internal and external realities, and reflects our desire to internalize one another. With regard to clinical work, this paper explores the following ideas specifically: the apparent absence of narrative in the analysis of some patients; the use of story as a defence in the service of a false self; how we differentiate ‘true’ and ‘false’ stories; and, lastly, the therapeutic value of reconstruction as a form of sto

ISSN:0021-8774    

DOI:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1995.00405.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY