ISSN:0096-140X    

DOI:10.1002/1098-2337(1995)21:3<164::AID-AB2480210302>3.0.CO;2-A

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractThis study tested the construct validity (convergent and discriminant) of a competitive reaction‐time aggression paradigm. Seventy‐nine males completed three trait aggression questionnaires and then competed on a reaction‐time task whereby they received and delivered shocks to a fictitious opponent. Results demonstrated strong positive relationships between shock intensity administered and the trait measures of overt aggression but not with the measures unrelated to overt aggression. Results are discussed with regard to their contribution to the construct validity of the aggression paradigm used in this study. © 1995 Wiley‐L

ISSN:0096-140X    

DOI:10.1002/1098-2337(1995)21:3<199::AID-AB2480210303>3.0.CO;2-Q

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractThe article deals with possible differences in the evaluation of interpersonal and intergroup aggression. Study I investigated whether the typical perspective‐specific divergence in judgments about aggressive interactions (with actors evaluating their behavior as more reasonable and less inappropriate than recipients) varied in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Additionalty, the possible mediating influence of lay epistemic motivation and subjective judgmental confidence was explored. Results indicated that the social context had an important impact on the evaluation of aggressive interactions: there was a lower dissent between actors and recipients in the intergroup than in the interpersonal condition. However, the direction of this pattern of data differed from what could be derived from theories of aggressive and intergroup behavior. Subjective confidence and lay epistemic motivation did not influence the inappropriatencess ratings.Study II tried to shed some further light on the context‐specific evaluation of aggressive interaction by presenting episodes of different severity and by obtaining judgments on both actions as well as reactions. Results showed that‐irrespective of severity‐aggressive reactions were evaluated more negatively in intergroup contexts. It is proposed that this effect stemmed from context‐specific differences in the application of the norm of re

ISSN:0096-140X    

DOI:10.1002/1098-2337(1995)21:3<205::AID-AB2480210304>3.0.CO;2-4

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractThe effects of competing asymmetries (intruder size advantage vs. prior residence) on dominance relationships were investigated in a laboratory setting. Sexually mature (Form I) male red swamp crayfish, 25%‐27% larger than the average member of several mixedsex communities of 20‐25 sexually mature conspecifics, individually intruded upon these communities on successive days. Each community was invaded once a day, with each of these large intruders invading every community once during the experiment. Five days after the last large intruder invasion, novel intruder group males, approximately the same size as the average community member, individually invaded the same communities, all communities being invaded once during a single day of testing. These novel intruders were used to differentiate the effects of intruder size from those effects of being put into a novel environment. During each intrusion, the frequencies of dominance, submission, aggressive standoffs, and nonaggressive interactions between the intruder and members of the community were recorded. The large intruders on each day immediately and virtually completely dominated all encountered community members, and the large intruders were significantly more dominant than the novel, smaller‐sized intruders. The size advantage of the large intruders overwhelmed prior residence in influencing dominance outcomes, even in these well established communities. © 1995 Wiley‐L

ISSN:0096-140X    

DOI:10.1002/1098-2337(1995)21:3<225::AID-AB2480210305>3.0.CO;2-#

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0096-140X    

DOI:10.1002/1098-2337(1995)21:3<237::AID-AB2480210306>3.0.CO;2-Q

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0096-140X    

DOI:10.1002/1098-2337(1995)21:3<239::AID-AB2480210307>3.0.CO;2-H

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0096-140X    

DOI:10.1002/1098-2337(1995)21:3<::AID-AB2480210301>3.0.CO;2-9

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1995

数据来源: WILEY