|
1. |
The virtual notebook system™: An architecture for collaborative work |
|
Journal of Organizational Computing,
Volume 1,
Issue 3,
1991,
Page 233-250
G. Anthony Gorry,
KevinB. Long,
AndrewM. Burger,
CynthiaP. Jung,
BarryD. Meyer,
Preview
|
PDF (1140KB)
|
|
摘要:
We have developed the Virtual Notebook System™ (VNS™) to facilitate information acquisition, sharing, and management in groups. The VNS allows teams to create shared electronic notebooks upon whose pages they can place text and images and, in certain cases, audio and video entities. Members of a team can interconnect the pages of a notebook with navigational links, making the notebook shared hypertext. Additionally special links, called action links, can be used to tie pages of a notebook to external programs. Here we discuss the architecture of the VNS and give a number of examples of its use. We also identify those aspects of the VNS development that seem to have been most important in its success.
ISSN:1054-1721
DOI:10.1080/10919399109540162
出版商:Taylor & Francis Group
年代:1991
数据来源: Taylor
|
2. |
Oral history and information technology: Human voices of assessment |
|
Journal of Organizational Computing,
Volume 1,
Issue 3,
1991,
Page 251-274
LesleyWilliams Brunet,
CharlesT. Morrissey,
G. Anthony Gorry,
Preview
|
PDF (1414KB)
|
|
摘要:
Dramatic advances in technology for acquiring, managing, and sharing information promise to reshape the workplace by eliciting new behaviors and introducing new organizational patterns. For academic medical centers, the integration of information technology into programs of education, research, and patient care is essential for increased organizational effectiveness.
ISSN:1054-1721
DOI:10.1080/10919399109540163
出版商:Taylor & Francis Group
年代:1991
数据来源: Taylor
|
3. |
What: An argumentative groupware approach for organizing and documenting research activities |
|
Journal of Organizational Computing,
Volume 1,
Issue 3,
1991,
Page 275-302
SafaaH. Hashim,
Preview
|
PDF (1606KB)
|
|
摘要:
The topic of this paper is a process‐vs.‐product design method representation calledArgumentative Writing (AW).Argumentative writing is a multi‐representation approach for conducting and reporting research projects. AW has at least two representations: one for structuring the problem‐understanding/solving process and one for communicating its product to others. We discuss WHAT, a hypertext‐based tool for AW. In WHAT (Writing with a Hypermedia‐based Argumentative Tool), the design process is captured using Rittel'sIssue Based Information Systems (IBIS)method (Conklin, 1988; Hashim, 1990a; Rittel, 1980). The product of the design process is represented in WHAT using a general document‐representation scheme. In the Introduction we raise four major issues that we explore in the rest of the paper. Also in the Introduction, we show the impact the WHAT approach can have on organizational computing applications such as business education and training (Hashim, Rathnam, & Whinston, 1991) and the design of dialectical organizational information systems. The section “A Methodological Basis for AW Tools”; deals with the rationale behind choosing the IBIS method in capturing the design process. The section after that explains WHAT, and the section following it explores its use as a groupware tool. The applicability of WHAT and its pros and cons are discussed in two separate sections. In the Conclusion we outline the potentiality of the approach and present suggestions for its further development. Since our first reporting on WHAT (Hashim, 1990b), the AW approach was found applicable to educational, scientific, and business areas. One such application is for structuring case discussions in business schools (Hashim et al., 1991).
ISSN:1054-1721
DOI:10.1080/10919399109540164
出版商:Taylor & Francis Group
年代:1991
数据来源: Taylor
|
4. |
Executive GDSS: Behavioral considerations at individual, organizational, and environmental levels of analysis |
|
Journal of Organizational Computing,
Volume 1,
Issue 3,
1991,
Page 303-322
DavidV. Gibson,
Preview
|
PDF (1351KB)
|
|
摘要:
This article emphasizes the importance of behavioral considerations at individual, organizational, and environmental levels of analysis when researching and evaluating the design, implementation, and use of group decision support systems (GDSS) within complex organizations. Discussion is based on interview and archival data collected on an executive level GDSS used within a corporate setting. Issues that are considered generalizable to organizational computing, coordination, and collaboration technologies concern (a) viewing organization participants as strategic, intuitive information processors, (b) understanding the importance of organizational power, politics, and situational constraints on decision making, and (c) appreciating the symbolic value of advanced information technologies to an organization's external environment.
ISSN:1054-1721
DOI:10.1080/10919399109540165
出版商:Taylor & Francis Group
年代:1991
数据来源: Taylor
|
5. |
Editorial board |
|
Journal of Organizational Computing,
Volume 1,
Issue 3,
1991,
Page -
Preview
|
PDF (64KB)
|
|
ISSN:1054-1721
DOI:10.1080/10919399109540161
出版商:Taylor & Francis Group
年代:1991
数据来源: Taylor
|
|