摘要:

BackgroundThe role of rate and volume of infusion in survival from experimental uncontrolled hemorrhage was evaluated.MethodsHemorrhage was initiated using tail resection in 43 female rats assigned to the following five groups: nonresuscitated; resuscitated with moderate volume, slower rate; resuscitated with moderate volume, faster rate; resuscitated with high volume, slower rate; and resuscitated with high volume, faster rate.ResultsA trend toward improved survival was noted with faster rate of infusion (60 vs. 33.3% survival rate with moderate volume and 28.6 vs. 12.5% with high volume, compared with 16.7% in the nonresuscitated animals).ConclusionRapid infusion of moderate volume of isotonic saline improved survival in uncontrolled hemorrhage. Extreme volumes, infused rapidly, also resulted in higher survival rates compared with those observed in nonresuscitated rats.

ISSN:0022-5282    

出版商:OVID    

年代:1999

数据来源: OVID

ISSN:0022-5282    

出版商:OVID    

年代:1999

数据来源: OVID

摘要:

ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that controlled resuscitation can lead to improved survival in otherwise fatal uncontrolled hemorrhage.MethodsUncontrolled hemorrhage was induced in 86 rats with a 25-gauge needle puncture to the infrarenal aorta. Resuscitation 5 minutes after injury was continued for 2 hours with lactated Ringer's solution (LR), 7.3% hypertonic saline in 6% hetastarch (HH), or no fluid (NF). Fluids infused at 2 mL[center dot]kg-1[center dot]min (-1) were turned on or off to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 40, 80, or 100 mm Hg in six groups: NF, LR 40, LR 80, LR 100, HH 40, and HH 80. Blood loss was measured before and after 1 hour of resuscitation.ResultsSurvival was improved with fluids. Preresuscitation blood loss was similar in all groups. NF rats did not survive 4 hours. After 72 hours, LR 80 rats (80%) and HH 40 rats (67%) showed improved survival over NF rats (0%) (p < 0.05). Rebleeding increased with MAP. Attempts to restore normal MAP (LR 100) led to increased blood loss and mortality.ConclusionControlled resuscitation leads to increased survival compared with no fluids or standard resuscitation. Fluid type affects results. Controlled fluid use should be considered when surgical care is not readily available.

ISSN:0022-5282    

出版商:OVID    

年代:1999

数据来源: OVID

摘要:

BackgroundEndothelial cell injury after hemorrhage and resuscitation (HEM/RES) might contribute to intestinal hypoperfusion and mucosal ischemia. Our recent work suggests that the injury might be the result of complement activation. We hypothesized that HEM/RES causes complement-mediated endothelial cell dysfunction in the small intestine.MethodsMale Sprague-Dawley rats (195-230 g) were anesthetized and HEM to 50% of baseline mean arterial pressure for 60 minutes. Just before RES, animals received either soluble complement receptor-1 (sCR1, 15 mg/kg) to inhibit complement activation or saline vehicle. Resuscitation was with shed blood and an equal volume of saline. Two hours after RES, the small bowel was harvested to evaluate intestinal nitric oxide synthase activity (NOS), neutrophil influx, histology, and oxidant injury.ResultsHEM/RES induced tissue injury, increased neutrophil influx, and reduced NOS activity by 50% (vs. SHAM), all of which were completely prevented by sCR1 administration. There were no observed differences in oxidant injury between the groups.ConclusionHistologic tissue injury, increased neutrophil influx, and impaired NOS activity after HEM/RES were all prevented by complement inhibition. Direct oxidant injury did not seem to be a major contributor to these alterations. Complement inhibition after HEM might ameliorate reperfusion injury in the small intestine by protecting the endothelial cell, reducing neutrophil influx and preserving NOS function.

ISSN:0022-5282    

出版商:OVID    

年代:1999

数据来源: OVID

摘要:

IntroductionNonoperative management of solid organ injury from blunt trauma in children has focused concern on potential delays in diagnosis of hollow viscus injury with resultant increases in morbidity, mortality, and cost. This study of a large pediatric trauma database will review the issues of difficulty and/or delay in diagnosis as it relates specifically to definitive treatment and outcome.MethodsWe surveyed 11,592 consecutive admissions to a designated pediatric trauma center from 1985 to 1997 to identify children with documented injury of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract from blunt trauma. The records were extensively analyzed specifically in regard to mechanism of injury, type and site of injury, time to diagnosis, operative treatment, complications, and final outcome.ResultsThe 79 children identified, 4 months to 17 years old, included 27 females and 52 males. Mechanism of injury included 15 restrained and 7 unrestrained passengers, 15 pedestrians, 15 child abuse victims, 10 bike handlebar intrusions, 8 discrete blows to the abdomen, 4 bike versus auto, 3 falls, and 2 crush injuries. There were 51 perforations, 6 avulsions, and 22 lesser injuries including contusions. Injury of the small bowel was most common, 44 cases, followed by the duodenum, 18 cases, colon, 17 cases, and stomach, 6 cases. In 45 children, diagnosis was made quickly by a combination of obvious clinical findings, plain x-ray and/or initial computed tomographic findings mandating urgent operative intervention. Diagnosis was delayed beyond 4 hours in 34 children, beyond 24 hours in 17 children and was made by persistent clinical suspicion, aided by delayed computed tomographic findings of bowel wall edema or unexplained fluid. The six deaths were caused by severe head injury. Complications included two delayed abscesses and two cases of intestinal obstruction. All 73 survivors left the hospital with normal bowel function.ConclusionsInjury to the GI tract from blunt trauma in children is uncommon (<1%). The majority of GI tract injuries (60%) are caused by a discrete point of energy transfer such as a seatbelt (19%), a handle bar (13%), or a blow from abuse (19%), or other blows and is unique to this population. Although diagnosis may be difficult and often delayed, this did not result in excessive morbidity or mortality. Safe and effective treatment of GI tract injuries is compatible with nonoperative management of most other injuries associated with blunt abdominal trauma in children, while reducing the risk of nontherapeutic laparotomy.

ISSN:0022-5282    

出版商:OVID    

年代:1999

数据来源: OVID

摘要:

ObjectiveMotor vehicle collisions are a leading cause of death and disability in pregnant women. The purpose of this study was to examine current restraint practices by pregnant women. Additionally, the beliefs and knowledge of pregnant women about restraint laws and effectiveness were studied.MethodsFrom May of 1997 to January of 1998, women were surveyed at initial prenatal visit at four obstetrical clinics. Data collected included age, gravida, ethnicity, educational level attained, payor source, restraint use, and knowledge of effectiveness of restraint use.ResultsA total of 807 women completed surveys. Most always wore restraints before pregnancy, but increased restraint use during pregnancy (79% vs. 86%, chi squared, p = 0.02). Only 52% used restraints properly. Significantly fewer women believed restraints were beneficial to mother and fetus in late pregnancy compared with early pregnancy. Only 21% of women were educated on proper restraint use during pregnancy. Comparison by payor mix showed no difference in use or education received.ConclusionsMost women use restraints and continue to do so during pregnancy, but they use them improperly. Pregnant women are familiar with mandatory restraint laws but are less informed about restraint use in pregnancy. Few women receive education from health care providers about proper restraint use. This study highlights the need for aggressive educational efforts to improve car restraint use in pregnant women, thereby reduce maternal and fetal injury and death.

ISSN:0022-5282    

出版商:OVID    

年代:1999

数据来源: OVID

ISSN:0022-5282    

出版商:OVID    

年代:1999

数据来源: OVID

ISSN:0022-5282    

出版商:OVID    

年代:1999

数据来源: OVID

摘要:

ObjectivesThe management of colonic trauma is well established for simple injuries with primary repair, and ileocolostomy for right-sided injuries that undergo colonic resection. Segmental colon resection for injuries to the left colon can be managed with either an end colostomy or primary anastomosis. A retrospective review was performed to evaluate the outcome and complications associated with colonic resection for trauma to determine the risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage.MethodsA retrospective review included patients undergoing colonic resection for trauma. The patients were stratified into colostomy, ileocolostomy, and colocolostomy groups. Patient demographics and colon-related complications were collected. Comparison between the colostomy and colocolostomy groups was performed to determine the difference in outcome. The outcome of right-sided colon injuries managed by either an ileocolonic or colocolonic anastomosis was compared. Analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leakage.Resultsor=to25 (p = 0.03) or hypotension in the emergency department (p = 0.001) to be associated with increased risk of developing an anastomotic leak from a colocolonic anastomosis.ConclusionColonic injuries that are managed with resection are associated with a high complication rate regardless of whether an anastomosis or colostomy is performed. Colonic resection and anastomosis can be performed safely in the majority of patients with severe colonic injury, including injuries to the left colon. For injuries of the right colon, an ileocolostomy has a lower incidence of leakage than a colocolonic anastomosis. For injuries to the left colon, there remains a role for colostomy specifically in the subgroups of patients with a high ATI or hypotension, because these patients are at greater risk for an anastomotic leak. The role of resection and primary anastomosis versus colostomy in colonic trauma requires further investigation.

ISSN:0022-5282    

出版商:OVID    

年代:1999

数据来源: OVID

摘要:

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the previously unreported application of the extensile Henry approach to the operative treatment of acetabular fractures.MethodsThirty-one cases were retrospectively reviewed at an average follow-up of 18.5 months.ResultsThere were 8 simple and 23 complex associated fracture patterns. The average operative time was 4.5 hours, and the average blood loss was 1,160 mL. Reduction was anatomic in 26 patients (84%), satisfactory in 4 patients (13%), and unsatisfactory in 1 patient (3%). Radiographic results at follow-up were 25 excellent results, 4 good results, and 2 poor results. Twenty-six patients reported no limitation of ordinary activities, whereas five patients had to modify their activities because of pain. No heterotopic ossification occurred in 24 patients (77%). In the seven patients with heterotopic ossification, only one patient had a significant decrease in hip range of motion. Additional complications were two cases of superficial wound infection, one case of hardware failure, and two cases of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. There were no iatrogenic injuries to the sciatic nerve, nor was there any development of flap necrosis.ConclusionThe extensile Henry approach is a versatile approach offering an excellent exposure for surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. The rate of complications is comparable with or lower than that of other surgical approaches. By providing a direct exposure of the posterior pelvis, the extensile Henry approach has the advantage of minimizing the risk of iatrogenic injury to the sciatic nerve. In addition, the incidence of clinically significant heterotopic ossification may be reduced through the use of low-dose radiation prophylaxis.

ISSN:0022-5282    

出版商:OVID    

年代:1999

数据来源: OVID