1. |
Land Development Regulation: Introduction |
|
Real Estate Economics,
Volume 9,
Issue 4,
1981,
Page 319-320
Hugh O. Nourse,
Preview
|
PDF (123KB)
|
|
ISSN:1080-8620
DOI:10.1111/1540-6229.00246
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1981
数据来源: WILEY
|
2. |
Growth Management and Land use Controls: The San Francisco Bay Area Experience |
|
Real Estate Economics,
Volume 9,
Issue 4,
1981,
Page 321-344
Kenneth T. Rosen,
Lawrence F. Katz,
Preview
|
PDF (2082KB)
|
|
摘要:
Local land use and growth controls have had a substantial negative impact on the San Francisco Bay Area housing market. These regulations have significantly diminished the availability of development opportunities in the region and forced builders to make major changes in the way they do business and costly alterations in their development projects. Both the empirical evidence reviewed and the case studies documented in this paper indicate that building moratoria, growth management systems, and restrictive zoning practices have helped lead to significantly increased house prices in those Bay Area communities in which they are present. The evidence strongly suggests that land use controls as they are currently utilized in the Bay Area provide a poor policy alternative for reconciling important environmental and fiscal considerations with equally important regional and national housing needs.
ISSN:1080-8620
DOI:10.1111/1540-6229.00247
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1981
数据来源: WILEY
|
3. |
The Impact on Housing Costs of the California Coastal Zone Conservation Act1 |
|
Real Estate Economics,
Volume 9,
Issue 4,
1981,
Page 345-366
Fred E. Case,
Jeffrey Gale,
Preview
|
PDF (1693KB)
|
|
摘要:
Evaluating the impact of California's Coastal Commissions' actions on housing costs provide challenges to economists and political scientists for which they lack both adequate theory and data to reach decisive conclusions. At best evaluation of eight years of Commissions' actions indicate that their actions have saved some scarce coastal resources most in need of protection. However, these achievements created some types of excessive costs and market dislocations which promise to affect adversely housing costs in major populous urban areas. Unfortunately the full range of public and private costs remains undefined and current judgments about Commissions' actions must remain tentative.
ISSN:1080-8620
DOI:10.1111/1540-6229.00248
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1981
数据来源: WILEY
|
4. |
The Coastal Construction Control Line: A Cost‐Benefit Analysis |
|
Real Estate Economics,
Volume 9,
Issue 4,
1981,
Page 367-383
Jerry D. Belloit,
Halbert C. Smith,
Preview
|
PDF (1381KB)
|
|
摘要:
This paper reports on a cost‐benefit study of the Florida Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) in Martin County, Florida. The study compared the costs of implementing and maintaining the line with the value of the potential benefits resulting from (1) storm damage reduction and (2) increased open space. A systems model of development patterns was designed to project forward the historic development patterns along the beach which were compared with the patterns that have occurred subsequent to implementing the CCCL. The analysis showed the CCCL not to be cost effective in the area studie
ISSN:1080-8620
DOI:10.1111/1540-6229.00249
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1981
数据来源: WILEY
|
5. |
Housing Costs and Prices Under Regional Regulation |
|
Real Estate Economics,
Volume 9,
Issue 4,
1981,
Page 384-396
James C. Nicholas,
Preview
|
PDF (986KB)
|
|
摘要:
The regulation of development by regional agencies was proposed in the American Law Institute's Model Land Development Code. The objective of this additional regulation was to bring new development into accord with the growing concern with environmental degradation. The State of Florida was the first state to adopt its own version of the Code. This article reviews the housing cost and price impacts of this regulatory process as it has evolved in Florida. The empirical evidence suggests that both the cost and the price of new housing subject to this review are increased above that of housing exempted.
ISSN:1080-8620
DOI:10.1111/1540-6229.00250
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1981
数据来源: WILEY
|
6. |
Land Development Regulation: A Case Study of Dallas and Houston, Texas |
|
Real Estate Economics,
Volume 9,
Issue 4,
1981,
Page 397-417
Richard B. Peiser,
Preview
|
PDF (1858KB)
|
|
摘要:
This paper compares the approaches to land development regulation in Dallas and Houston and attempts to measure the impact of regulation on lot prices in the two cities. Land development in Dallas appears to be subject to a greater degree of regulation than in Houston, especially with respect to zoning and the provision of utilities. In Houston, utilities are provided by Municipal Utility Districts which give developers greater flexibility in subdivision site selection. Other regulations concerning land use, platting, road financing and environment are examined for their impact on development costs in the two cities. The paper closes with a “full” lot cost comparison for selected subdivisions in Dallas and Houston. Lot prices are found to be lower in Houston. The difference is largely explained by differences in regulation and a transfer of cost from the private to the public sec
ISSN:1080-8620
DOI:10.1111/1540-6229.00251
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1981
数据来源: WILEY
|
7. |
Land use Controls: The Case of Zoning in the Vancouver Area |
|
Real Estate Economics,
Volume 9,
Issue 4,
1981,
Page 418-435
Jonathan H. Mark,
Michael A. Goldberg,
Preview
|
PDF (1377KB)
|
|
摘要:
This paper explores the relationship between rezoning and changes in observed property values and the ability of zoning to mitigate externalities. Three separate methodologies are used in three locations in metropolitan Vancouver to examine these issues. Our results imply that rezoning does not necessarily lead to changes in land use and value. Further, no evidence was found to support the assertion that there are significant negative externalities due to incompatible land uses in residential property markets. Based on these results, we feel it is reasonable to question the continued use of zoning in developed areas of urban regions.
ISSN:1080-8620
DOI:10.1111/1540-6229.00252
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1981
数据来源: WILEY
|
8. |
The Impact of Inclusionary Zoning on the Location and Type of Construction Activity |
|
Real Estate Economics,
Volume 9,
Issue 4,
1981,
Page 436-456
John M. Clapp,
Preview
|
PDF (1408KB)
|
|
摘要:
This paper models the impact of an inclusionary zoning ordinance on a local housing market. Markets are segmented spatially and by the mix of housing characteristics. The paper develops a framework which explains how households and builders make rational choices among alternative segments. This implies that they can react to inclusionary zoning by relocating away from the impacted sector. Therefore, the introduction of inclusionary zoning should be preceded by a study of alternative market segments. For example, the presence of attractive alternatives will allow developers and households to exit the market segments impacted by inclusionary zoning. This would cause a decline in construction activity in the covered sector.
ISSN:1080-8620
DOI:10.1111/1540-6229.00253
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1981
数据来源: WILEY
|
9. |
Land use Controls: Can Landowners Force Governmental Bodies to Pay? |
|
Real Estate Economics,
Volume 9,
Issue 4,
1981,
Page 457-473
Peter J. Shedd,
Preview
|
PDF (1392KB)
|
|
摘要:
A governmental body has the right to regulate owners' use of their land by exercising police powers. However, when such regulation substantially deprives an owner of the use of land, the owner can argue that a taking has occurred. Traditionally, a landowner could seek a declaration that the governmental regulation was unconstitutional and should be enjoined. At times an alternative remedy available to the landowner has been to sue for monetary damages. This latter action is called inverse or reverse condemnation.This article examines two recent United States Supreme Court cases that address whether or not an inverse condemnation action is a permissible means by which a landowner can challenge the excessive nature of a zoning regulation. Although these cases have not directly answered this question, this article concludes that such a remedy would be beneficial and should be allowed.
ISSN:1080-8620
DOI:10.1111/1540-6229.00254
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1981
数据来源: WILEY
|