摘要:

AbstractDurkheim's thinking on scientific knowledge reveals several contradictions, resulting from the relativist implications of his substantive theory of culture and the positivist assumptions of his metatheoretical definition of scientific methods in sociology. In his explanations of historical and cross‐cultural differences in „truthful”︁ representations of reality, Durkheim suggests that logical and conceptual structures of knowledge are determined by social morphology, and that the validity of any truth‐claim is limited to cultural contexts in which designated criteria of validation are normatively maintained. However, in epistemological works such asThe Rules, Durkheim suggests that social factors are of little importance in constructing scientific knowledge, and that truths of science mirror external reality and so their validity transcends cultural b

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(198204)18:2<107::AID-JHBS2300180202>3.0.CO;2-K

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1982

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractApplied to the interpretation of social phenomena, Freud's insights have been at once extraordinarily fruitful yet susceptible to oversimplification and pejorative stereotyping. A number of his fundamental concepts–the existence of an irrational mass mind, the Oedipal family constellation, the pathology of psychic regression–have, when used to understand collective experience, created powerful myths. Only gradually did he and his successors modify and amplify these myths, resulting in the elaboration of ego psychology and the concept of identity. These concepts connected psychoanalysis with contemporary social, political, and historical thought and allowed more nuanced forms of explanati

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(198204)18:2<130::AID-JHBS2300180203>3.0.CO;2-Z

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1982

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractThe thesis that Weber was without influence in Weimar Germany is examined. It is shown that in contemporary published assessments and in private statements in interviews contemporary sociologists regarded him as important. The many dissertations on Weber and the enormous secondary literature are noted. This literature, which was contributed by some of the best minds of the day, included both the philosophical and sociological aspects of Weber's work. It is concluded that the thesis that Weber was without influence is false.

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(198204)18:2<147::AID-JHBS2300180204>3.0.CO;2-A

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1982

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractIn their critique, Factor and Turner attempt to substitute one commonplace for another by merely supplying long lists of publications that mention Max Weber. While accepting their reproof that I applied the concept of „influence”︁ too narrowly, my response endeavors to map out the directions that further research in this area will need to follow if the controversy is ever to move beyond jejune pol

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(198204)18:2<157::AID-JHBS2300180205>3.0.CO;2-6

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1982

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

Abstract„Ethnoscience”︁ in the early 1960s provides a prototypical case of an elite specialty. With easy access to recognition, there was only a loose confederation, not at all the kind of tightly knit social network with a garrison worldview typifying revolutionary groups. Elite specialities both grow and dissolve more rapidly than revolutionary groups; they require less commitment, and concomitantly offer less resistance to competitors. Ethnoscience lacked a single leader and was never monol

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(198204)18:2<163::AID-JHBS2300180206>3.0.CO;2-E

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1982

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractCriticisms are made of Nicholas Pastore's comments on High, „Shadworth Hodgson and William James's Formulation of Space Perception.”︁ Dr. Pastore's comments appeared inJHBS17 (1981): 48

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(198204)18:2<176::AID-JHBS2300180207>3.0.CO;2-1

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1982

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(198204)18:2<181::AID-JHBS2300180208>3.0.CO;2-C

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1982

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(198204)18:2<184::AID-JHBS2300180209>3.0.CO;2-0

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1982

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(198204)18:2<185::AID-JHBS2300180210>3.0.CO;2-N

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1982

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(198204)18:2<187::AID-JHBS2300180211>3.0.CO;2-E

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1982

数据来源: WILEY