摘要:

AbstractAugust Comte's criticisms of the introspective method in psychology and John Stuart Mill's replies are examined, and it is argued that Mill's response is largely correct. It is suggested that Comte never understood what the method aimed to do because his roots were, through Franz Joseph Gall, in the tradition of the Scots critics of associationism, rather than the tradition of David Hartley and James Mill and John Stuart Mill. The innatist theories of perception and of morality had the consequence that the introspective method used by the associationists to uncover the genetic roots of mental phenomena can be of no use. With this background we are not surprised at Comte's view of the proper method for a science of psychology.

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(199104)27:2<107::AID-JHBS2300270202>3.0.CO;2-M

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractThis case study of an inter‐university controversy over the publication of research from an interdisciplinary social science project on the forced migration and long‐term internment of West Coast Japanese‐Americans during World War II shows some of the difficulties of maintaining ownership of research materials. In this particular instance the junior employee was able to override his seniors' demand for control of the dissemination of research results by playing on the concerns about even appearing to suppress work for political reasons. The paper discusses conflicting norms of science and rhetorics of justification ranging from proprietary self‐interest through “good science” to “the national interest” and onto “the needs o

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(199104)27:2<130::AID-JHBS2300270203>3.0.CO;2-0

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

AbstractDavid Rapaport's collection of Otto Fenichel'sRundbriefe(1934–1945) is described as a recently rediscovered, 2,500‐page primary source for studying the intellectual and organizational history of European‐American psychoanalysis. Beginning as the confidential newsletter of the Reich‐Fenichel “Left opposition” within the International Psychoanalytic Association, its function became primarily intellectual as Fenichel's group ceased to function as a caucus. It ended when its editor decided to devote himself to the struggle against neo‐Freudianism within psychoanalysis, and to practice as a licen

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(199104)27:2<157::AID-JHBS2300270204>3.0.CO;2-B

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(199104)27:2<166::AID-JHBS2300270205>3.0.CO;2-A

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(199104)27:2<174::AID-JHBS2300270206>3.0.CO;2-C

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(199104)27:2<176::AID-JHBS2300270207>3.0.CO;2-3

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(199104)27:2<180::AID-JHBS2300270208>3.0.CO;2-H

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(199104)27:2<181::AID-JHBS2300270209>3.0.CO;2-B

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(199104)27:2<183::AID-JHBS2300270210>3.0.CO;2-V

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0022-5061    

DOI:10.1002/1520-6696(199104)27:2<185::AID-JHBS2300270211>3.0.CO;2-M

出版商:Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY