|
1. |
In this issue |
|
R&D Management,
Volume 24,
Issue 1,
1994,
Page 1-2
Preview
|
PDF (152KB)
|
|
ISSN:0033-6807
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00842.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1994
数据来源: WILEY
|
2. |
Patterns of international R&D cooperation for new product development: the Olivetti multimedia product |
|
R&D Management,
Volume 24,
Issue 1,
1994,
Page 3-15
Patrizia Zagnoli,
Chiara Cardini,
Preview
|
PDF (963KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractThe aim of the paper is to identify a number of different patterns of international R&D cooperation during the initial phases of the product development process. This is a case‐study of new product development based on the work of the Olivetti Multimedia Laboratory in Pisa, how it set up its own pattern of multinational collaboration in the idea generation and pre‐competitive phase; how, in turn, this collaboration led to new R&D collaboration agreements to satisfy specific problem‐solving requirements connected with the confirmation of a dominant design, though limited to a certain extent by previous agreements between Olivetti and other firms; the role played by marketing in the choice of alternative solutions. Finally, in the product implementation phase, the emergence of a defined technological paradigm leads to a highly competitive environment, where R&D collaboration is increasingly directed towards multifunctional requirements (R&D, manufacturing, marketing) within a strategic network of alliances that involves large sized companies, start‐up firms, industrial and university researc
ISSN:0033-6807
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00843.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1994
数据来源: WILEY
|
3. |
Motivations and obstacles to university industry cooperation (UIC): a Mexican case |
|
R&D Management,
Volume 24,
Issue 1,
1994,
Page 017-030
R. E. López‐Martínez,
E. Medellín,
A. P. Scanlon,
J. L. Solleiro,
Preview
|
PDF (1139KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractWithin the context of linkage between universities and the productive sector in Mexico, this article seeks to answer the following questions: i) which are the principal motivations for researchers at universities to carry out technological research and to seek ties to industry? ii) which are the main motivations for industrial entrepreneurs to establish cooperation with universities to develop technology? and iii) which are the main barriers to a healthy relationship between both institutions?Our answers are based on data from two sources: (a) an exploratory survey of 31 researchers at the National University of Mexico and of 28 Mexican entrepreneurs, half of whom had previous experience in collaborative projects; and, (b) a subsequent panel discussion among questionnaire respondents designed to elicit in‐depth qualitative data concerning motivations and obstacles to university‐industry cooperation.The authors present the factors identified in the study as key elements in the development of liaisons between the two sectors in Latin American countries, and argue the need to rethink our conceptions of motivations and barriers within a theoretical framework of interinstitutional communications and organizational cultural cha
ISSN:0033-6807
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00844.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1994
数据来源: WILEY
|
4. |
Innovating through alliances: expectations and limitations |
|
R&D Management,
Volume 24,
Issue 1,
1994,
Page 033-045
Francis Bidault,
Thomas Cummings,
Preview
|
PDF (1109KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractIn this paper we have analysed the innovation processes occurring in several cross‐industry technology partnerships in order to suggest some key managerial issues pertaining to the effectiveness of these increasingly popular initiatives. Our general proposition, based on an extensive literature review and clinical research, is that the managerial hurdles in partnerships frequently offset, and in some cases eliminate, the expected innovation advantages. We submit that there is a fundamental tension between the dynamics of innovation and the logic of partnering. The extent of the tension, however, depends on the nature of the innovation project and on the characteristics of the partnership. Thus we recommend that managers involved in the formation of joint‐R&D agreements should carry out an innovation‐partnering assessment to design an appropriate management structure that would minimise the ‘tension’. Lastly, we suggest some ingredients for carrying out such an assessment, and directions for further research.Alliances seem to be today's answer to most management challenges. As recent surveys show, companies all over the world are forming partnerships to alleviate difficulties met in nearly every business activity —design, manufacturing, distribution, service… (e.g. Hergert&Morris, 1987; Urban, 1989), The popularity of such strategic initiatives in the 1980's has led to a dramatic increase in the number as well as in the forms of alliances (Hagedoorn and Schak
ISSN:0033-6807
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00845.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1994
数据来源: WILEY
|
5. |
Does it pay to acquire technological firms? |
|
R&D Management,
Volume 24,
Issue 1,
1994,
Page 047-056
Alok Chakrabarti,
Jurger Hauschildt,
Christian Süverkrüp,
Preview
|
PDF (702KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractThe paper focuses on several research questions: How do the firms differ in terms of their strategic objectives for foreign acquisitions? What are the determinants of ‘success’ of acquisition? What are the differences between the American and German firms in terms of their acquisition strategies and successes?Our special interest was to get a closer look into the technological motive of the foreign acquisitions. This made a two‐step procedure necessary. A first survey of 86 firms had to identify those acquisitions which were motivated by technological interests through a questionnaire. Findings: There are four classes of companies with different motives for acquisitions: Market oriented entrepreneurs, Short‐term profit seekers, Technological acquirers, Preemptive market protectors.The second survey investigated the process and the results of acquisitions with a special view on the role of research and development through 60 interviews in 30 acquisition cases in both acquiring and acquired units. Findings: A network of variables explains the success. The most important are context variables (uncertainty, cultural differences), size of both firms, low degree of formalization, expertise, and lack of conflicts about technological phi
ISSN:0033-6807
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00846.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1994
数据来源: WILEY
|
6. |
Technology strategies and the Miles&Snow typology: a study of the biotechnology industries |
|
R&D Management,
Volume 24,
Issue 1,
1994,
Page 057-064
Ursula Weisenfeld‐Schenk,
Preview
|
PDF (616KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractStrategic behaviourhas been defined as managing environmental risks and matching organisational capabilities with the opportunities offered by the environment (e.g. Hofer&Schendel (1978)). One possible theoretical framework for analysing strategies of a firm is theMiles&Snow typology(Miles&Snow, 1978). It has received considerable attention and has been tested empirically with respect to business strategy in various industries (Snow&Hrebiniak, 1980; Hambrick, 1983) as well as marketing strategy (McDaniel&Kolari, 1987).In this paper we attempt to apply the Miles&Snow typology to technology strategy and to relate technology strategies to the perception of environment and project risks. Thus, weEmpirical data from companies involved in biotechnology is used to study some key questions.
ISSN:0033-6807
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00847.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1994
数据来源: WILEY
|
7. |
Business Strategy, R&D Management and Environmental Imperatives |
|
R&D Management,
Volume 24,
Issue 1,
1994,
Page 065-082
Nigel Roome,
Preview
|
PDF (1466KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractEnvironmental imperatives are seen by many business leaders to represent a major issue for the 1990's and beyond. The debate about the environmental sustainability of economic activity has important implications for the development of business and places considerable emphasis on the need for planned corporate change. The strategic significance of the environment is particularly critical to R&D as this is characterised by long planning horizons and provides the setting for the development of future products and processes.The purpose of this paper is to examine the connections between environmental imperatives, strategic change and R&D management. To this end the paper reviews the strategic nature of environmental pressures on business. From this base, consideration is given to the responses required by business, in meeting these pressures. The paper concludes by suggesting that the application of management techniques in concert with organisational change is needed for R&D management to build environmental considerations effectively into innovation. These suggestions can be used to gauge how far individual businesses have developed the systems and structures to enable them to move towards sustainability. The implication of the paper is that R&D management will not only need to apply new management techniques but will have to play a leading role in innovative organisational structures in order to fulfil the full potential of environmentally sensitive products and processes.
ISSN:0033-6807
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00848.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1994
数据来源: WILEY
|
8. |
Application of option pricing theory to R&D |
|
R&D Management,
Volume 24,
Issue 1,
1994,
Page 083-089
D. P. Newton,
A. W. Pearson,
Preview
|
PDF (477KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractMuch attention has been paid in the literature to methods for the evaluation and selection of R&D projects. The evidence is that these are less extensively used than might be expected. More recently, an approach based on Option Pricing Theory has been suggested as one which is likely to be of considerable value to management. In this paper the method is described, the information which is required is identified and the way in which it might be applied in practice is discussed.
ISSN:0033-6807
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00849.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1994
数据来源: WILEY
|
9. |
The allocation of R&D resource |
|
R&D Management,
Volume 24,
Issue 1,
1994,
Page 091-097
J. H. Scholefield,
Preview
|
PDF (422KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractThe allocation of R&D resource in a multi‐business organisation is often based more on current operating performance than on the relative potential for technological development of the businesses. The approach suggested in this paper attempts to overcome these problems by linking R&D allocation very closely to business strategy. The two key concepts are technology leverage, i.e. the extent to which technology can change the business environment in an industry to yield competitive advantage, and business leverage i.e. the current competitive strength of an individual business within an industry. Where technology leverage is weak, competitive advantage will be mainly dependent on factors other than R&D and it is suggested that levels of R&D effort at or below 1 % of turnover are appropriate. Where technology leverage is strong, R&D can be effective in maintaining strong business leverage by achieving technology mastery or in transforming a weak business position by creating a technological discontinuity. R&D intensities ranging from 3 to 15 or more % of turnover are thought to be appropriate in these cases. This framework can be used for policy debates on R&D allocation, for example whether the R&D allocation is appropriate for the business strategy or whether R&D could spearhead a more expansionist business strategy. The framework has been successfully used in ICI Chemicals and Polymers Limited during the annual R&D budget proces
ISSN:0033-6807
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00850.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1994
数据来源: WILEY
|
10. |
Engineering Project Management |
|
R&D Management,
Volume 24,
Issue 1,
1994,
Page 099-100
R. CHARLES PARKER,
Preview
|
PDF (195KB)
|
|
ISSN:0033-6807
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00851.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:1994
数据来源: WILEY
|
|