|
1. |
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques |
|
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques,
Volume 15,
Issue 1,
2002,
Page 1-1
Thomas Zdeblick,
Preview
|
|
ISSN:1536-0652
出版商:OVID
年代:2002
数据来源: OVID
|
2. |
Persistent Low Back Pain and Sciatica in the United States: Treatment Outcomes |
|
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques,
Volume 15,
Issue 1,
2002,
Page 2-15
Mohammed BenDebba,
Warren Torgerson,
Robert Boyd,
Edgar Dawson,
Russell Hardy,
James Robertson,
George Sypert,
Clark Watts,
Donlin Long,
Preview
|
PDF (797KB)
|
|
摘要:
Patients with persistent low back pain (LBP) appear to be different in several important ways from patients who have traditionally been classified as patients with acute or chronic LBP, and data on the effectiveness of the treatments prescribed for them are lacking. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of the treatments currently prescribed for these patients. The data reported in this article were gathered as part of a multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study of patients who were treated for persistent LBP by neurologic and orthopedic surgeons who are recognized specialists in spinal disorders. At enrollment, patients completed a baseline evaluation, and their physicians recorded relevant clinical and treatment data on standardized study forms. At 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment, patients completed follow-up evaluations. Patients were divided into five treatment groups, and effectiveness was evaluated separately for each group using five patient-reported measures of outcome: pain severity, functional disability, psychologic distress, physical symptoms, and health care use. The data revealed that at the 2-year follow-up, the typical patient of the no-treatment group had improved slightly in terms of pain severity and health care use, but had experienced little or no improvement in functional disability, physical symptoms, and psychologic distress. The average patient in the conservative care group reported small improvements in pain severity, functional disability, physical symptoms, and health care use, with no change in psychologic distress. These small improvements occurred within the first 3 months after enrollment, with essentially no change thereafter. The average patient in the immediate surgical care group showed substantial improvement on all of the outcome measures. The observed improvements were evident shortly after treatment and were maintained for the duration of the study. Patients in the delayed surgical care group had outcomes that were less dramatic than those observed in the immediate surgery care group, but greater than those observed in the conservative care group. The patients who were treated surgically by physicians outside the study, outside surgical care group, did not improve over time. Patients with persistent LBP who received no treatment showed no spontaneous recovery. Conservative care treatments prescribed by surgeons who specialize in spinal disorders, did not appear to be any more effective than no treatment. The outcome of surgery for persistent LBP varied from dramatic for one subgroup of surgical patients, to poor for another subgroup of patients. Patients who were selected immediately for surgical treatment improved substantially. Those treated surgically later by study physicians or by physicians not associated with the study fared less well.
ISSN:1536-0652
出版商:OVID
年代:2002
数据来源: OVID
|
3. |
Moving Toward a Standard for Spinal Fusion Outcomes Assessment |
|
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques,
Volume 15,
Issue 1,
2002,
Page 16-23
Kevin Blount,
W. Krompinger,
Rose Maljanian,
Bruce Browner,
Preview
|
PDF (359KB)
|
|
摘要:
Previous spinal fusion outcomes assessment studies have been complicated by inconsistencies in evaluative criteria and consequent variations in results. As a result, a general consensus is lacking on how to achieve comprehensive outcomes assessment for spinal fusion surgeries. The purpose of this article is to report the most validated and frequently used assessment measures to facilitate comparable outcomes studies in the future. Twenty-seven spinal fusion outcomes studies published between 1990 and 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. Study characteristics such as design, evaluative measures, and assessment tools were recorded and analyzed. Based on the reviewed literature, an outcomes assessment model is proposed including the Short Form-36 Health Survey, the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the North American Spine Society Patient Satisfaction Index, the Prolo Economic Scale, a 0–10 analog pain scale, medication use, radiographically assessed fusion status, and a generalized complication rate.
ISSN:1536-0652
出版商:OVID
年代:2002
数据来源: OVID
|
4. |
The Association of Sagittal Spinal and Pelvic Parameters in Asymptomatic Persons and Patients with Isthmic Spondylolisthesis |
|
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques,
Volume 15,
Issue 1,
2002,
Page 24-30
Péter Rajnics,
Alexandre Templier,
Wafa Skalli,
Francois Lavaste,
Tamás Illés,
Preview
|
PDF (2761KB)
|
|
摘要:
Using a specialized orthopedic software package, the authors investigated the sagittal spinal shape and the position of the pelvis in the space in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis and in persons with no such symptoms. Digitized lateral spinal radiographs of 30 healthy volunteers and 48 patients were evaluated. The absolute values and significant correlations between parameters were analyzed. The pelvic parameters correlated well with lordosis, which shows sagittal balance in the asymptomatic group. The hyperlordosis and the horizontally positioned sacrum in isthmic spondylolisthesis enlarge the tensile force component of gravity, which may cause the lysis. Finally, the authors developed a new balance between the pelvis and the spine after slipping of the vertebral body. The degree of slipping correlated well with the sacrofemoral anatomic constant (incidence), which is unique in each person.
ISSN:1536-0652
出版商:OVID
年代:2002
数据来源: OVID
|
5. |
Unilateral Transforaminal Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF): Indications, Technique, and 2-Year Results |
|
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques,
Volume 15,
Issue 1,
2002,
Page 31-38
Thomas Lowe,
A. Tahernia,
Michael O'Brien,
David Smith,
Preview
|
PDF (2053KB)
|
|
摘要:
A prospective analysis of consecutive cases of lumbar fusion using the unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) technique with pedicle screw fixation. The objective of the study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcome of TLIF and describe the technique and indications in the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Forty patients treated with TLIF for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine were followed up for a minimum of 2.5 years (mean: 36 months; range: 30–42 months). Twenty-three patients had degenerative disc disease alone, 13 had associated isthmic or degenerative spondylolisthesis, and 4 had recurrent disc herniations at the L4–L5 level. Thirty-six (90%) had solid fusions radiographically at latest follow-up. Seventy-nine percent had excellent or good clinical outcomes. Our patients demonstrated high fusion rates and patient satisfaction.
ISSN:1536-0652
出版商:OVID
年代:2002
数据来源: OVID
|
6. |
Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Comparative Study with Conservatively Treated Patients |
|
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques,
Volume 15,
Issue 1,
2002,
Page 39-46
Massimo Mariconda,
Roberto Fava,
Alan Gatto,
Chiara Longo,
Carlo Milano,
Preview
|
|
摘要:
The authors performed single- or multiple-level unilateral laminectomy to treat lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with mild to moderate leg pain and compared the results with those from patients treated with conservative therapy in a prospective study. This decompression technique produced a 68% rate of improvement compared with a 33% rate for conservatively treated patients. The surgical group exhibited significant and sustained improvement, whereas the functional and clinical status of the conservatively managed group had returned to baseline during the same period. The preoperative dural sac cross-sectional area at the level of the most stenosis was 70.76 ± 28.2 mm2for the surgical group, whereas on postoperative scans it was 108.12 ± 31.5 mm2, with an average correction rate of 65%. Neither new degenerative spondylolisthesis nor any evidence of instability was detected in any patient during the study.
ISSN:1536-0652
出版商:OVID
年代:2002
数据来源: OVID
|
7. |
COMMENTARY |
|
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques,
Volume 15,
Issue 1,
2002,
Page 46-46
Thomas Ducker,
Preview
|
|
ISSN:1536-0652
出版商:OVID
年代:2002
数据来源: OVID
|
8. |
Preoperative CT Examination for Accurate and Safe Anterior Spinal Instrumentation Surgery with Endoscopic Approach |
|
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques,
Volume 15,
Issue 1,
2002,
Page 47-51
Mikio Kamimura,
Testuya Kinoshita,
Hidehiro Itoh,
Yohei Yuzawa,
Jun Takahashi,
Hiroki Hirabayashi,
Isao Nakamura,
Preview
|
|
摘要:
The purpose of this article is to introduce a new procedure for the surgical planning of thoracic anterior spinal instrumentation via endoscopy. For accurate and safe anterior screw insertion via the endoscopic approach, we devised a surgical plan based on the preoperative chest computed tomography (CT) findings obtained with radiographic markers. Using this method, we performed endoscopic thoracic spinal instrumentation surgery in 14 patients. Nine patients underwent anterior endoscopic correction and fusion of idiopathic scoliosis by Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation, and five patients underwent anterior endoscopic spinal fixation with instrumentation. The accuracy of screw insertion was evaluated postoperatively by CT scanning. One interbody fusion cage and 53 screws were inserted in the 14 patients using endoscopy. Postoperative CT scans revealed that the screws were all accurately inserted without any neurologic complications. In conclusion, using this novel procedure for surgical planning based on CT findings obtained with radiographic markers, anterior screws can be inserted safely and accurately via an endoscopic approach.
ISSN:1536-0652
出版商:OVID
年代:2002
数据来源: OVID
|
9. |
COMMENTARY |
|
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques,
Volume 15,
Issue 1,
2002,
Page 51-52
Lawrence Lenke,
Preview
|
|
ISSN:1536-0652
出版商:OVID
年代:2002
数据来源: OVID
|
10. |
A Biomechanical Comparison of Posterolateral Fusion and Posterior Fusion in the Lumbar Spine |
|
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques,
Volume 15,
Issue 1,
2002,
Page 53-63
Chen-Sheng Chen,
Cheng-Kung Cheng,
Chien-Lin Liu,
Preview
|
|
摘要:
Late postoperative complications occurred after posterior fusion and posterolateral fusion as a result of biomechanical alterations. The stress change between the two fusion procedures has not been well reported. To differentiate the biomechanical alteration that occurs with posterior fusion and posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine, the load sharing of the vertebrae, disc, facet joint, bone graft, and the range of motion were computed in a finite element model. Five finite element models, including the intact lumber spine, posterior fusion, posterior fusion with implant, posterolateral fusion, and posterolateral fusion with implant, were created for stress analysis. The finite element model estimated that the differences between these two fusion procedures were within 7% in stress of the adjacent disc, 3% in force of the facet joint above the fusion mass, and 5% in the range of motion. However, the stress of the pedicle in posterolateral fusion without an implant was at most two times greater than that in the intact lumbar spine under lateral bending. The stress of pars interarticularis in posterior fusion without an implant was also at most two times greater than that in the intact lumbar spine under lateral bending. After the implant was added, the discrepancy between the two fusion procedures decreased but still remained a relatively large difference. Therefore, the largest changes of posterior fusion and posterolateral fusion were in the pars interarticularis and pedicle, respectively.
ISSN:1536-0652
出版商:OVID
年代:2002
数据来源: OVID
|
|