摘要:

294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected.The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results.The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable.The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm.Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected.Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm.in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic.This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm.of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased.The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm.up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation.Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity.CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C.of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view.Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned.Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium.Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms.of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.

ISSN:0003-2654    

DOI:10.1039/AN932570745b

出版商:RSC    

年代:1932

数据来源: RSC

摘要:

294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected.The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results.The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable.The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm.Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected.Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm.in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic.This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm.of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased.The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm.up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation.Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity.CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C.of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view.Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned.Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium.Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms.of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view.Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium.Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C.of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm.in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable.The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm.of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased.The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.

ISSN:0003-2654    

DOI:10.1039/AN9325700750

出版商:RSC    

年代:1932

数据来源: RSC

摘要:

294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected.The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results.The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable.The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm.Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected.Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm.in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic.This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm.of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased.The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.

ISSN:0003-2654    

DOI:10.1039/AN9325700757

出版商:RSC    

年代:1932

数据来源: RSC

摘要:

760 MITCHELL AND WARD SEDIMENTS IN INK AND IN WRITING Sediments in Ink and in Writing BY C. AINSWORTH MITCHELL D.Sc. F.I.C. AND T. J. WARD (Read at the Meeting May 4 1932) FOR several years we have been studying more or less independently the nature of the sediments which form in ink and their significance in writing. NORMAL SEDIMENTATION IN INK VATS.-A~~ inks made from galls copperas, dye and acid are allowed to stand for several weeks at least in order that the vegetable ddbris and the more insoluble iron-tannin compounds may subside. The sludge at the bottom of the vat varies in composition but usually contains a considerable proportion of the blue dyestuff which has been carried down mechanically and when oxalic or tartaric acid has been used as the stabilising agent it will also contain insoluble oxalates or tartrates.The amount of iron in the dry deposit has been found to range from less than 5 per cent. to over 27 per cent. as is shown by the following partial analyses of actual deposits dried at 100" c. I I1 I11 IV V Per Cent. Per Cent. Per Cent. Per Cent. Per Cent. Mineral matter 17.51 49.04 9.12 10.12 14-20 Organic matter 82.49 50.96 90.88 89.88 85.80 Iron in deposit 13-12 27.35 6.28 4.76 7.06 Iron in mineral matter 74.92 55-77 68.85 45.68 49.7 1 Special interest attaches to No. V since it is a deposit from a vat of gallic acid ink. In one experiment on a large scale in which the sediment was separated by centrifuging the moist solid material contained 0.38 per cent. of the blue dye. If the ink is drawn off before sedimentation is complete the process will continue in the bottle and eventually a very fine deposit will be thrown down and will spoil the appearance of the ink.Writing done with ink containing such deposit will differ in appearance under the microscope from that done with a normal clear ink as may be seen in PI. I 1 and 9. ABNORMAL SEDIMENTATION.-If the proportion of iron to the tannin has not been correctly calculated to yield a soluble iron tannate which will oxidise but slowly an insoluble iron tannate will be rapidly formed and except for the iron gallate present the ink will be decolorised. For example in experiments in which that remarkable glucose-free gallotannin, previously described (ANALYST 1923 48 7 328) was used the following typical results inter alia were obtained.For practical purposes the 10.1 per cent. of gallic acid in this tannin may be ignored since it has little effect upon the calculations. Gallotannin Iron sulphate Ratio of tannin Grm. Grm. to iron Effect 0.1 0.1 10 2 Precipitation in 5 days 0.1 0.05 10 1 Precipitation in 10 to 15 days 0.1 0.025 10 0.5 Stable for six week MITCHELL AND WARD SEDIMENTS IN INK AND IN WRITING 761 Hence the ratio of iron to tannin should be about 5 100 and if there is much deviation from this proportion in either direction precipitation may occur either in the vat or later in the ink-bottle. The effect of excess of either ingredient in the ink may appear in writing done with it. If there is excess of iron the ink will stain the paper in a uniform bluish-green layer (Pl.I 3) in which the usual large masses of black pigment will not appear whereas if there is an abnormal excess of tannin the accumulations of pigment will appear as large black irregular clots (Pl. I 2). SEPARATION OF GALLIC AcID.-Occasionally a crystalline film may form on the surface of the ink in a closed bottle and lead to complaints which will puzzle an ink-maker since he is confident that no change has been made in the formula used in the preparation of an ink which has previously proved satisfactory. The explanation of the trouble depends upon the fact that the solubility of gallic acid is so small that an ink especially one prepared from tannic acid (gallotannin), may become saturated with gallic acid at a relatively high temperature and if the bottle is then exposed to a somewhat lower temperature the gallic acid will separate in minute crystals on the surface.Sol~bility of Gallic Acid.-The following table shows the solubility of pure gallic acid (dried at 100" C.) in distilled water at various temperatures. The gallic acid used contained 10.3 per cent. of water and its purity determined colori-metrically by comparison with pyrogallol (ANALYST 1923 48 2) was 100 per cent. (m.pt. 241" C.) When this gallic acid was heated with boiling water until a homogeneous liquid was obtained the solution contained 48.71 per cent. (by weight) of gallic acid. At other temperatures the percentage solubility (w/w) was as follows : Temperature 43°C. 32°C. 28°C. 21°C. 16°C. 76°C. 56°C. 5-0"C. 3°C. Solubility 3.39 2.61 2.17 1-72 0.91 0.76 0.74 0.73 0.59 Commercial Gallotannins.-The following analyses which are typical are those of two commercial gallotannins the first of which produced a crystalline film on the ink made from it whilst the other did not.The tannin and gallic acid were determined by the colorimetric method (loc. cit.). A Per Cent. Water . . 1. 9.9 Total tinctogenic' value (in [644 terms of gallic acid) Gallic acid . . 39.7 Gallotannin 25.1 Non-tinctogenic substances 25.3 per cent.] B Per Cent. 6.2 [62*0 per cent.] 12-4 49.6 31.8 The consignment A contained an exceptionally high proportion of gallic acid with the result that the ink must have reached its saturation point for that acid at the ordinary temperature (15.5' C.) and when chilled readily produced a crystalline film 762 MITCHELL AND WARD SEDIMENTS I N INK AND I N WRITING The appearance of writing in ink from which the gallic acid has crystallised is characteristic.(Pl. I 4.) FROZEN INK.-A condition under which an ordinary blue-black ink might appear to be a mixture of a writing- and a copying-ink is when it has been frozen and is in the state of thawing. One would hardly anticipate that anyone would be so unreasonable as to write with a half-thawed ink and then to complain of the result and yet on several occasions ink-manufacturers have had to investigate such complaints. If an ordinary iron-gall blue-black ink is frozen into a solid disc a fractionation occurs. The edges of the mass are colourless whilst the iron tannate and dye become concentrated in the middle and lower parts of the disc.When the part which thaws first beneath the mass is decanted it will be found to contain approximately twice as much blue dye as the original ink whilst the iron tannate and other constituents will show a corresponding increase. With a gallic acid ink the separation into fractions is much less pronounced than with an iron-gall ink. The following figures give some idea of the fractionation that occurs. FROZEN INKS Original Part first Residue Per Cent. Per Cent. Per Cent. ink thawing thawing last Iyon-gall ilzk. Total solids . . 3.60 6.39 1-19 Mineral matter . . 0-56 0.82 0.24 Iron . . 0.28 0.47 0- 16 Gallic acid ink. Total solids 3-34 4- 24 2-16 Mineral matter .. 0.38 0.66 0.30 Iron . . 0.28 0.41 0.14 If a partly-thawed ink is used for writing the portion near the bottom of the ink-bottle will produce the effect of a copying-ink that is to say will show an increased deposit of blue and black pigments and may appear iridescent in places. It may also appear to contain spicules (Pl. I 5) although in reality these. are cavities from which the ice-crystals have melted. On the other hand the upper part will be deficient in dye and iron tannate and will produce paler writing than the bottom fraction. EFFECT OF PEN LEFT IN INK.-One of the most frequent causes of the decom-position of ink in ink-wells is the practice of leaving the pen in the ink. The acid in the ink soon dissolves the iron of the nib and when an excess of iron in proportion to the tannin is reached an insoluble tannate is precipitated.Many years ago one of us based a crude test for the acidity of inks on the determination of the loss in weight by a pen-nib immersed in the ink and the method was subsequently officially adopted (without acknowledgment) in the United States. The test is still a useful one for comparative purposes as is show MITCHELL AND WARD SEDIMENTS I N INK AND I N WRITING 763 by the following results recently obtained by leaving weighed pen-nibs for 20 days in 10 C.C. of different inks and subsequently cleaning drying and weighing the nibs. Original ink Filtrate from deposit weight - Total Mineral Loss in ofnib solids matter Iron solids matter Iron A. English ink 10.99 3.25 0.42 0.20 2-27 0.8 0.46 B.Ditto 12-05 4.00 0.84 0.35 2.17 1.05 0.76 C. Japanese ink 12.75 5-28 2-02 0.59 3.83 2-47 0.80 Per Cent. Per Cent. Per Cent. Per Cent. Per Cent. Per Cent Per Cent. Writing done with ink which has been decomposed by a pen-nib appears in a photomicrograph very similar to that done with an ink containing an excess of copperas. (Pl. I 6.) WATERED INK.-Another common cause of sediments in ink is the practice, sometimes adopted in cottages of eking out the ink by the addition of water. Frequently the deposit in an ink-well has become largely insoluble and the addition of water not only reduces the colour of the soluble dye but also leaves particles of sediment. The effect of such dilution on writing is usually quite distinct from that of a blotted ink which will generally show a pale uniform ground without the solid particles to be seen in watered ink.DEPOSITS IN MIXED INKs.-The admixture of two inks of different character may cause sediments to form and these may be conveyed into the writing. This was the explanation of the abnormalities in the case of Skelton v. Hawes in which a will had been written in a mixture of three different inks and the strokes of the writing showed not only particles of sediment but also different colours in different parts of the signatures (see ANALYST 1932 146). Attempts to age an ink artificially may also sometimes be detected by an examination of the writing as happened in a case in which a clerk had falsified a ledger by writing up the entries in a mixture of ordinary ink and Indian ink.The addition of a drop of dilute sodium hypochlorite to one of the characters at once revealed the fraud for the particles of lamp-black derived from the Indian ink remained unbleached. Accidental dipping of the pen into the wrong bottle of ink may afford useful evidence in the writing. An instance of this occurred in the case of Rex v. Thzcrburn in which the defendant was charged with writing anonymous letters. An admitted document in the case was a series of caricatures drawn in artist’s black ink and the fact that two of the printed characters in the middle of the writing on an anonymous card were in the same kind of ink indicated that the writer of that card had accidentally dipped the pen into a bottle of that ink. In a more recent case (Riddle and Holder v.Midland Bank 1932) there were on a document two signatures the authenticity of which was not disputed although there was a sharp conflict of evidence as to the place where they were signed the plaintiffs contending that they were signed separately in Banbury and the defendants that they were signed at the same time in a bank manager’s office. The upper signature was written in an ordinary blue-black ink whilst in the othe 764 MITCHELL AND WARD SEDIMENTS I N INK AND I N WRITING the dye of the ink formed a pale greyish-violet ground on which the black pigment was distributed in irregular spots. The microscopical appearance was consistent with that of an ink in which the blue dye had faded and the black pigment had formed a sediment in the ink-well (Fig.25). This agreed with the story of the plaintiffs that the second signature had been signed with an old fountain-pen upon the nib of which the ink was encrusted and that this had been dipped into a dirty ink-pot at a farm-house. The defendants accounted for the ab-normal appearance of the second signature by the hypothesis that the pen had been accidentally dipped into a bottle of copying-ink standing open on the desk in the bank manager's office. Experiments however, showed that the writing had none of the characteristics of a mixture of copying-ink and ordinary blue-black ink. These mix well and do not form a sediment but the writing shows an increase of lustre due to the larger amount of aniline dye in the copying-ink. The signature in question so far from showing an increase in dye contained very much less than writing done with an ordinary blue-black ink.EFFECT OF ALKALINE GLASS.-It has Fig. 25 I.'ull-stoP in signature showing black deposit on grey back-ground x 60 already been demonstrated (ANALYST 1921 , posed by alkali dissolved from badly-made glass ink-bottles and the appearance of writing in such ink is quite characteristic (Pl. I 8) and not to be confused with writing in other forms of decomposed ink. MOULDS IN INK.-In former times bay-salt was added to ink to prevent it from becoming hoary,* i.e. turning grey through the growth of mould. In modern inks carbolic acid (or less frequently salicylic acid) is used for the same purpose. This precaution however is not dways effective for occasionally the ink in bottles which had been closed with a cork infected with mould will develop a growth which will eventually cause the ink to decompose and infection with mould may also occur in ink exposed to the air in an ink-well.This growth is not surprising for among the results recorded by Thom (The PeniciZZia p. 90) are those of Sabalitscha and Dietrich (Disirtfektion 1926 11, 67) who found that it required 0.14 per cent. of salicylic acid and 0.014 per cent. of phenol or thymol to inhibit the growth of a strain termed Perticillium glaucuum. The optimum temperature for the growth of most species of PerticiZZia lies between 22' and 30" C . (Thom Zoc. cit. p. 85). Among the enzymes recorded as occurring 46 129) that ink may be completely &corn-* H w ~ AnglO-SaXOn g~ey MITCHELL AND WARD SEDIMENTS I N INK AND IN WRITING 766 in Penicillia sp.are amylase cytase diastase maltase lactase and emulsin. Our experiments show that oxydase may be added to these for the addition of a trace of mycelium powder from a strain of PenicilZium* caused a pronounced acceleration in the precipitation of iron tannate from a solution of gallotannin and ferrous sulphate. This is shown by the following results which are typical of Tannin GITXI. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6 0-1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Iron sulphate Grm. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.026 0.026 blank inoculated blank inoculated blank inoculated blank inoculated inoculated blank inoculated Time of standing Days 3 3 8 8 11 11 18 18 16 36 36 Precipitate Grm.0.049 0.082 0.07 1 0.091 0.2884 0.3660 0.046 0.090 0.097 nil 0.0264 Iron in precipitate Per Cent. 6.7 6-38 13.6 13.2 8.45 -6.6 12-9 --6-09 Hence in each instance the precipitation of gallotannin by the iron was greatly accelerated by the presence of the mould and in some of the tests it was practically complete (for the 10 per cent of gallic acid in the tannin remained in solution in each set of tests) whilst only 50 to 60 per cent. had been precipitated in the absence of mould. Further work on this method of measuring oxidising activity is in progress. A proof of the fairly common occurrence of moulds in the inks of some twenty-five to thirty years ago is afforded by the fact that fragments of hyphae and mould spores may be looked for and found in the inks on old letters (see P1.I 7). POUNCES I N WRITING.-Long after the invention of blotting-paper the practice of using sand or other powder to dry writing was continued and indeed is not altogether obsolete at the present day. Originally the term “pounce” @oncer) was applied to a powder which was dusted on to parchment to make it take the writing. The so-called cuttle-fish “ bone ” (or “scuttle-bone ”) was commonly used for the purpose (cf. The Purefoy Letters,? p. 288) and subsequently the term was applied to the powders used to dry the writing. We are indebted to Mr. A. Lucas for a specimen of an Egyptian account book of 1767 the ink on which he described in a paper read before the Society (ANALYST 1922 47 11).For drying this ink a mica powder had been used and the deposit on * The Penicillium used in these experiments was kindly identified for us by Mr. Charles Thom mycologist to the U.S.A. Department of Agriculture as P . terrestre Jensen the name assigned to a group of strains rather than to a particular organism. -f The Puvefoy Letters 1736-1763. Edited by George Eland. 2 vols. with 28 plates. London Sidgwick & Jackson Ltd. Price 42s 766 MITCHELL AND WARD SEDIMENTS I N INK AND IN WRITING the strokes is particularly apparent in certain additional notes on the page (see Fig. 26). Blotting-paper has now to a large extent replaced sand as the drying agent in the Courts of Cairo but Mr. Lucas has kindly sent us a specimen of a brown sand still used for this purpose by an aged writer claiming to be 9f> years old (Pl.11 13). Chemical analysis of this sand gave the following results :-Moisture 0.08; sand 57.38 ; insoluble organic matter 9-52 ; chlorides (as sodium chloride) 32.49 ; soluble organic matter (by dif.) 0.53 per cent. Microscopical examination and sedimenta-tion* tests showed the material to consist of granite sand containing angular and rounded Mica crystals on writing in Arabic grains of quartz orthoclase felspar biotite mica and magnetite (F%O,). The vegetable constituents included fragments of seed coats stems leaves and hairs impregnated with sodium chloride. The small quantity of insect dkbris consisted of wing cases legs and antennae probably derived from small beetles.Examination of specimens of iron-gall writing will also often reveal particles of the pounce still adhering to the surface. For example very finely powdered pumice was detected in a letter written in 1837 (Pl. I ll) and particles of sand were found in a letter dated 1842 (PI. I 10) and in a book of 1840 (Pl. I 12). It is possible that the potato starch found in a letter of 1904 (Pl. 11 19) was derived from the use of farina for drying the writing. Fibres of blotting-paper adhering to an ink may sometimes be distinctive, as is to be seen in the photomicrograph of the ink on an envelope received from Paris this year (Pl. 11 24). certain conditions the presence of extraneous material contained in the ink may have some evidential value.For example the fine asbestos fibres found in a letter written in 1930 from an engineer’s office (Pl. 11 20) is suggestive of the origin of the letter. In another instance plant dkbris (probably straw dust for it gave a ligno-cellulose reaction) was found in a letter of June 1917 whilst similar particles were found in another letter written from the same house but a month later (Pl. 11 14 and 15). In a legal document a letter had been added to certain words either by the original writer immediately after the writing was completed or fraudulently by * The principle adopted was that of the “gravity column,” originally described by Sollas, in which a column of mixed liquids gradually increasing in density downwards is used. A narrow glass tube about 80 cm.in length was filled with a mixture of benzene and pure bromoform (commercial samples are frequently impure) the proportion of the latter increasing towards the bottom of the tube thus giving a column of liquid ranging in sp.gr. from about 0.88 at the top to 2-90 at the lower end. The fragment of unknown material was dropped into the tube and small glass bulbs or small (insoluble) crystals of inorganic salts of known sp.gr. were then added until one remained slightly above the fragment and one just below it; the desired value was Fig. 26 account-book of 1767 x 25 EVIDENTIAL VALUE OF SEDIMENTS I N WRITING.-It is obvious that under hen obtained by calculation MITCHELL AKD WARD SEDIMENTS I N INK AND IN WRITING 767 another person on a subsequent date.Since it was not permissible to bleach the ink-strokes which were in a heavy record ink and had not been blotted search was made throughout the writing for thin portions in which sediment might be visible under the microscope. At seven points some sediment was detected. The added letters had been blotted and the sediment also was easily visible. From the character and distribution of the various sediments it was highly probable that the added letters were written with ink from the same pot as used for the earlier writing. DISTRIBUTION OF SEDIMENT IN WRITING.-The sediment transferred by the pen from the ink-pot to the paper may afford an indication of the stages in the course of the writing at which the pen was dipped into the ink. The strokes produced immediately after dipping sometimes contain the greater proportion of a heavy sediment which diminishes (rapidly or slowly) in amount as the writing proceeds.Conversely a light floating sediment such as mould spores or insect dkbris will occasionally increase in amount as the pen becomes depleted of ink. This conclusion was subsequently confirmed by other evidence. METHODS FOR THE EXAMINATION OF DEPOSITS IN WRITING For most specimens of writing a microscopical examination without any preliminary preparation is satisfactory. The writing may be examined as an opaque object by reflected light by transmitted light if on translucent paper or by a combination of the two methods. Owing to reflection from the glossy and sometimes fluorescent surface of many ink-strokes the modern methods of vertical illumination axe seldom of value in the examination of ink sediments.In some writings the normal ink-colour is in large amount and almost obscures any sediment beneath. To overcome this absence of contrast and differentiate the sediment the stroke may be partly bleached by spotting with N/10 hydrochloric acid the excess of which is removed with filter-paper after a few seconds and this treatment is repeated if necessary. By this procedure the normal ink-colour is considerably lightened in tint whilst the sediment is apparently unaffected, and may be readily observed and photographed. IDENTIFICATION OF THE SEDIMENT OR DEPosIT.-sometimes the microscopic appearance of the sediment is in itself sufficient to enable one to determine its character especially with organised structures such as plant and insect dkbris, textile fibres etc.Other materials however may have to be removed from the writing and the microscopic fragments submitted to a physical and chemical examination before their identity can be established. Of the various methods tried we have found the following the most successful: (a) Sediments SolMble in Water.-The ink-stroke is moistened with a minute drop of benzene and gentle manipulation with a short rigid mounted needle will isolate the fragment which is then dried and examined. The use of a rigid needle is emphasised since a flexible one leads to much loss. Sediments Relatively InsolMble in Water or Dilute Acid.-The writing is brushed lightly with water or N/10 hydrochloric acid and the fragments are collected in a camel-hair brush which is then rinsed into water contained in a small centrifuge tube closed at the lower end with a rubber stopper.After being centrifuged the supernatant liquid is gently syphoned off and if necessary the (b 768 MITCHELL AND WARD SEDIMENTS I N INK AND I N WRITING residue is washed with dilute hydrochloric acid and water in the tube to eliminate ink-colour. After the wash-water has been removed the rubber stopper bearing the residue on its end is withdrawn. The separated particles are dried at a low temperature and the specific gravity of one fragment is determined by means of a gravity column of mercuric iodide in potassium iodide solution or of bromoform and benzene (vide szc@a). This is followed by microscopical examination to determine the crystallographic system refractive index and angle of extinction in polarised light after which suitable microchemical tests may be made We have found it possible in some cases to identify a quantity of sediment not exceeding 0.05 mgrm.in weight. PHOTOMICROGRAPHIC PKOCEDURE.-MoSt of the photographs shown in the figures are magnified 50 diameters this being obtained with an objective of 75 mm. focal length and an eyepiece giving a magnification of 8 diameters. The specimens were illuminated as opaque objects with a bull’s-eye condenser and in some instances a little transmitted light was also used. For documents from which small portions may be removed illumination by means of the old-fashioned Lieberkuhn reflector yields satisfactory results and it has the advantages over vertical illuminators of being simpler to manipulate and of giving slightly angular illumination which tends to eliminate confusing reflections from the surface of the ink.Many colour filters were tried in order to reduce or eliminate the ink-colour and render the dark sediments prominent and a diluted blue-black ink was found to yield good results in many cases. (Cj. Ward ANALYST 1930 55 568.) The most generally useful filter for this purpose however was prepared by dissolving the ferric tannin compound (precipitated on keeping an ink without added dye for a long time) in fused phenol and diluting the solution with water. With this filter the definition obtained is not particularly good owing partly to the difficulty of focussing with the faint blue light available and partly to the filter allowing some red light (in addition to blue and violet) to pass.To secure contrast when photographing extraneous deposits on the surface of the ink-strokes a filter composed of a 10 mm. layer of a 0.35 per cent. aqueous solution of tartrazine was employed. Most of the photomicrographs were taken on Wellington Anti-Screen plates, but where the writing had become brownish in colour Ilford Soft Gradation Panchromatic plates were used. We wish to thank Mr. S. Creasey for his assistance in the analytical work. DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES PLATE I FIG. 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Pen stroke with ink containing normal sediment x 60. Pen stroke with ink containing excess of tannin x 60.Excess of iron x 60. Excess of gallic acid x 50. Stroke made in ink partly thawed x 50. Effect of pen left in ink x 60. Mould hyphae in ink-writing x 50. Effect of alkaline glass on ink x 60. Writing in ink containing oxalic acid in the sediment x 100. Sand on writing in letter 1842 x 60. Sand on writing in book 1840 x 60. Pumice granules on writing in letter 1837 x 100 MITCHELL AND WARD SEDIMENTS IN INK AND I N WRITING 769 1;IG. 13. 24. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 31. 22. 23. 24. PLATE I1 Brown sand on writing in letter Cairo 1932 x 50. Plant d6bris in ink-writing in letter June 1917 x 100. Plant d6bris in ink-writing in letter from the same house July 1917 x 100. Plant hair in writing in letter 1902 x 100.Moth scales in writing in letter 1894 x 50. Moth scales (experimental) in ink-writing x 50. Potato starch in ink-writing in letter 1904 x 50. Asbestos in ink-writing in letter from an engineer’s house 1930 x 100. Calcium sulphate in ink-writing in laboratory notebook 1896 x 25. Effect of chalk in the ink x 50. Sediment in ink in laboratory notebook 1896 x 25. Rlotting-paper fibres on ink in letter from Paris 1932 x 50. DISCUSSION The PRESIDENT after commenting on the careful and remarkable manner in which this research had been presented said that his own connection with ink was in rather a different category. He occasionally had to give an opinion as to the amount of sediment that an ink would give when in use and he suggested that it might be possible to devise a method for determining this.He could very strongly support, as a good test for acid the immersion of two or three clean weighed nibs in the ink‘ two or three days and then wiping and re-weighing them. One could get very sound information and further one was treating the actual material to be used in the ink. He had not realised until Dr. Mitchell had mentioned the fact that the subsequent addition to the American report was derived from Dr. Mitchell’s suggestion. Mr. R. F. INNES said that he was exceedingly interested in the paper but from a different point of view than the authors had in mind. Could the authors say whether the oxidase in the mycelium of certain moulds would be able to act in the absence of iron. Presumably in the nib test the nib must be a steel nib.Was there any correlation between the corrosive action and the 9 of the ink? Mr. E. R. BOLTON asked whether sodium fluoride had been tried to prevent the growth of moulds. Mr. A. SCIVER expressed his appreciation of this very interesting paper. He, too had been working on writing-inks for five or six months and although he did not wish to appear too much of an iconoclast he had come to the conclusion that there was no really good ink on the British or American markets. He asked whether the strokes in the first six slides were made with a brush or with a pen. With regard to the freezing of ink he had recently been informed by a Japanese firm that the ink to be used by Russian and Japanese armies in Siberia had to resist intense cold and that it would often freeze solid in the officers’ fountain pens.Hence there must be some inks not affected by freezing. He too had intended to suggest the use of sodium fluoride as a preservative but there were a number of efficient organic compounds available to-day. With regard to the nib-corrosion test he had found that practically all inks would produce a semi-solid crust if steel nibs were left in them. In his experience the test had not proved successful for apart from the solution of the steel he found it difficult to know when to stop rubbing the encrusted material from the nib after immersion in the ink. He asked whether any published figures were available of the p of inks now on the market. He had been unable to trace any direct connection between the p of an ink and the formation of sediment.It was difficult to devise a method that would give an indication of the weight of a sediment but a simple volumetric method could be used. Had the authors tried the method of measuring the sediment in a long piece of tubing drawn out to a fine bore at one end 770 MITCHELL AND WARD SEDIMENTS IN INK AND IN WRITING In his opinion the development of sediment in ink required to be examined from the aspect of physical chemistry and in particular from the aspect of colloid chemistry, as distinct from the ratio of the tannin and iron. Dr. J. GRANT mentioned that papers of good quality were passed through a bath of very strong gelatin solution and he wondered if this might affect the sediment in the ink used on the paper.Mr. WARD replying said that in devising a standard method for determining the time of sedimentation it was necessary to take into consideration whether the ink was kept in a closed or an open bottle. If open there were numerous factors which might influence the sedimentation. With regard to the use of oxidation by moulds for the estimation of oxydase activity it was quite possible that the presence of iron was not essential. Some two years ago Guthrie (ANALYST 1930 55 709) had estimated oxydase action by using the substrate formed by heating glucose with sodium hydroxide. The nib for the corrosion test should certainly be of steel and not of stainless steel or gold. Different inks were stabilised with different acids-some with sulphuric others with oxalic and others again with acetic acid and the degree of corrosion would vary with the acid.He had always found that brushing the nib with a tooth-brush in water was a satisfactory method of removing the incrustation. Referring to the solidification of ink Mr. Ward mentioned that he had seen an ink 75 per cent. of which became a solid jelly. It was contained in a cheap German fast-filling container of soda-glass. One had only to add a drop of water to the glass to obtain a distinctly alkaline solution. The photomicrographs of the earlier slides all represented strokes made with a pen in the usual way. Referring to the photomicrograph showing the deposit of potato-starch in the writing he mentioned that this deposit could be seen all through the letter and was therefore obviously in the ink.He did not agree with the observation of Mr. Sciver that there was not a really good ink on the market; it depended upon the connotation of “really good.” If one could buy an ink which would keep in good condition in the bottle for at least six months he would consider that a satisfactory ink. Dr. MITCHELL said that no definite relationship had been established between the p value and the corrosive action of different inks although the determination of the hydrogen ion concentration was of comparative value. On the other hand, the method which he had devised of adding sodium acetate to an ink and distilling the liberated acetic acid (ANALYST 1921 46 131) had been found to afford a measure of the corrosive acid and acid compounds in an ink. Sodium fluoride would be an effective preservative against moulds but would have the drawback of attacking the glass of the bottle. His remarks about the freezing of ink had been misunderstood he had meant that it was unreasonable to complain of the results obtained with a half-thawed ink. A good ink should recover its original com-position and properties after thawing. Physical methods of determining the stability of inks would probably prove of value but in his experience the ratio of tannin to iron was as yet the best criterion. It was possible as Dr. Grant had suggested that the sizing material of the paper might affect the constituents of some inks. Mr. Sciver’s volumetric method of measuring the sediment might sometimes be useful but with many inks it would be difficult to determine the line of demarcation owing to the dark colour of both ink and deposit

ISSN:0003-2654    

DOI:10.1039/AN9325700760

出版商:RSC    

年代:1932

数据来源: RSC

摘要:

294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected.The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results.The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable.The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm.Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected.Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm.in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic.This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm.of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased.The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.

ISSN:0003-2654    

DOI:10.1039/AN9325700771

出版商:RSC    

年代:1932

数据来源: RSC

摘要:

294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected.The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results.The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable.The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm.Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected.Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm.in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.

ISSN:0003-2654    

DOI:10.1039/AN9325700773

出版商:RSC    

年代:1932

数据来源: RSC

摘要:

294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected.The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results.The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable.The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm.Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected.Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm.in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic.This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm.of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased.The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm.up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation.Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity.CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C.of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view.Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned.Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium.Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms.of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.

ISSN:0003-2654    

DOI:10.1039/AN9325700775

出版商:RSC    

年代:1932

数据来源: RSC

摘要:

294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected.The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results.The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable.The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm.Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected.Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm.in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.

ISSN:0003-2654    

DOI:10.1039/AN9325700779

出版商:RSC    

年代:1932

数据来源: RSC

摘要:

294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected.The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results.The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable.The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm.Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected.Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm.in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.

ISSN:0003-2654    

DOI:10.1039/AN932570780b

出版商:RSC    

年代:1932

数据来源: RSC

摘要:

294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm. Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected.The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected. Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results.The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm. in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable.The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.294 EVERS: THE DETECTION OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF CALCIUM Adding 5 mgrms. of calcium. Added salts. Result. No added salt. Immediate pptn. Sodium chloride, 1 grm. Borax, 1 grm. Sodium potassium tartrate, 1 grm.Potassium citrate, 1 grm. Variations in the concentration of the reagents did not appreciably improve matters. It was found that even 0.25 grm. of potassium citrate in 60 C.C. of solution prevented the precipitation of 2 mgrms. of calcium. Further complications would be introduced if magnesium were also present in the salt as an impurity. CALCIUM OLEATE TEsT.-The formation of an opalescence on the addition of sodium oleate solution to a solution is an extremely delicate test for calcium. Under the best conditions 0.01 mgrm. of calcium in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0.00002 per cent., can just be detected. The test is also, of course, a test for magnesium, but is much less sensitive, 0-6 mgrm. in 50 C.C. of solution, or 0-0012 per cent., being the minimum quantity which can be detected.Further, within certain limits of concentration the pre- cipitation of magnesium is entirely suppressed in the presence of potassium citrate, whilst the sensitiveness of the calcium test is actually increased. The best conditions for the detection of calcium were found to be as follows: Take 50 C.C. of the solution containing calcium, which should be neutral or slightly alkaline. Dissolve in it 2 grms. of potassium citrate, and add 0-3 C.C. of a solution prepared by dissolving 10 grms. of oleic acid in 200 C.C. of 1 per cent. sodium hydroxide. A certain excess of alkali is desirable for the best results. The test is only satisfactory between certain limits of calcium concentration. With quantities exceeding 1 mgrm.in 60 C.C. the opalescence is actually reduced. Under the above conditions quantities of mag- nesium up to 15 mgrms. give no opalescence. Summarising the results, the oleate test is excellent for quantities of calcium varying from 0-01 mgrm. up to 1 mgrm. in the absence of more than 10 mgrms. of magnesium, and within these limits in the absence of other salts the opalescence appears proportional to the calcium present. Further experiments showed, however, that, in spite of its delicacy, the oleate test is not suitable for the purpose in view. Possibly, if the test could be carried out, using standards containing the same concentration of the same salt, it would be satisfactory, but this is hardly practicable. The addition of other salts, even in the absence of potassium citrate, caused the results to be erratic. This was partly due to their “salting out ” effect on the soap, which sometimes caused flocculation, but this was not the whole explanation. Almost immediate pptn. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. Slight ppt. after 30 minutes. No ppt. This line of investigation was therefore abandoned. Mix and allow the mixture to stand. An excess of the reagent gives less opalescence.

ISSN:0003-2654    

DOI:10.1039/AN9325700781

出版商:RSC    

年代:1932

数据来源: RSC