|
1. |
Improving the effect of atmospheric stability class for dispersion modeling |
|
Process Safety Progress,
Volume 17,
Issue 1,
1998,
Page 1-8
John L. Woodward,
Preview
|
PDF (687KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractRecent guidelines released by the U.S. EPA define a worst‐case scenario as a release under stable atmospheric conditions defined as Pasquil‐Gifford stability class F. Unfortunately, very few tests at F stability have been available heretofore to provide a basis for models. Recent test data with propane releases by the German research organization TUV provide a set of 60 experiments conducted specifically to define the effects of atmospheric stability class on dispersion. Of these, 25 tests were at F stability. A comparable number were at each other stability class A through E. In addition 23 tests were at wind speeds under 1.5 m/s in stable atmospheres. This paper reports on adjustments made to our models based on these new data by reducing the originally‐postulated sensitivity to stability class. In spite of considerable scatter in the TUV data, particularly between two different types of propane analyzers, the model allows us to extract information by averaging over the
ISSN:1066-8527
DOI:10.1002/prs.680170103
出版商:American Institute of Chemical Engineers
年代:1998
数据来源: WILEY
|
2. |
Process safety update |
|
Process Safety Progress,
Volume 17,
Issue 1,
1998,
Page 3-4
Preview
|
PDF (238KB)
|
|
ISSN:1066-8527
DOI:10.1002/prs.680170102
出版商:American Institute of Chemical Engineers
年代:1998
数据来源: WILEY
|
3. |
KG: New data and analysis |
|
Process Safety Progress,
Volume 17,
Issue 1,
1998,
Page 9-15
Joseph A. Senecal,
Patricia A. Beaulieu,
Preview
|
PDF (549KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractThe design and deflagration pressure relief vents is based on correlations developed for various types of combustible materials and for enclosures of different strengths. The primary guideline for deflagration vent design in the US is NFPA 68 Guide for Venting of Deflagrations [5]. That document gives guidance for the design of vents for enclosures containing flammable gases, specifically hydrogen, coke oven gas, propane, and methane. Application of the guide to other gases is achieved using the KGvalue. Values of KGare published for a relatively small number of gases, as seen in Table D‐1 of NFPA 68. This work present KGdata on several additional gases obtained in a laboratory scale test vessel along with analysis of the results with respect to published values of fundamental burning velocit
ISSN:1066-8527
DOI:10.1002/prs.680170104
出版商:American Institute of Chemical Engineers
年代:1998
数据来源: WILEY
|
4. |
Vent access restriction for solids handling systems |
|
Process Safety Progress,
Volume 17,
Issue 1,
1998,
Page 16-19
Lionel Bernard,
Frank Brodie,
Dennis Ludwig,
Albert Ness,
Karl Weidner,
Preview
|
PDF (396KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractA multi‐disciplinary team developed a guideline for determining access restriction zones around vented solids handling equipment. The guideline provides a method for ensuring the discharge from a vented explosion will not cause injury to personnel. The steps in this method include: calculating the extent of external hazards from vented explosions; identifying potential areas where personnel could be exposed to a hazard; identifying ways to eliminate or reduce the hazard area; and establishing and documenting any access restrictions needed. Hazard zone calculations use the latest knowledge from research into fireball size, flame length and external pressure equations in VDI 3673. The guideline provides guidance for using this information. Options for mitigating or reducing external hazards from vented explosions are also described. As part of the project, the team audited several solids handling systems to look for potential oversights in existing restricted access areas. Some of the team's learnings from these audits are reviewe
ISSN:1066-8527
DOI:10.1002/prs.680170105
出版商:American Institute of Chemical Engineers
年代:1998
数据来源: WILEY
|
5. |
Safety surveys—looking at key activities in depth |
|
Process Safety Progress,
Volume 17,
Issue 1,
1998,
Page 20-22
Trevor A. Kletz,
Preview
|
PDF (298KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractMost audits try to look at a representative selection of the plant procedures and equipment. An alternative is a survey, a look in depth at selected procedures (such as those for testing alarms and trips, issuing permits‐to‐work, controlling modifications, taking samples or testing relief devices) or selected equipment (such as level glasses or equipment for handling LPG). If the procedure or equipment is well‐chosen, surveys may make a bigger contribution to safety, per person‐hour, than a conventiona
ISSN:1066-8527
DOI:10.1002/prs.680170106
出版商:American Institute of Chemical Engineers
年代:1998
数据来源: WILEY
|
6. |
NFPA 30: An update and a look into the future |
|
Process Safety Progress,
Volume 17,
Issue 1,
1998,
Page 23-31
Robert P. Benedetti,
Preview
|
PDF (875KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractIn May 1996, the Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code Committee of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) proposed for adoption by the Association a new edition of NFPA 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code. This new edition was the culmination of two and one‐half years' work by the Committee and included one of the most significant changes to that document in some twenty years: the incorporation of mandatory fire protection criteria for warehouses and other inside areas that store flammable and combustible liquids in containers and portable tank
ISSN:1066-8527
DOI:10.1002/prs.680170107
出版商:American Institute of Chemical Engineers
年代:1998
数据来源: WILEY
|
7. |
Risk based prioritization of maintenance repair work |
|
Process Safety Progress,
Volume 17,
Issue 1,
1998,
Page 32-38
John A. Harnly,
Preview
|
PDF (614KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractThis paper describes the development of a risk ranked Inspection Recommendation procedure that is used by one of Exxon's chemical plants to prioritize repairs that have been identified during equipment inspection.As part of the Company's Safety Management Practices initiative in the late 1980's a procedure was put into place to ensure that an Inspector's repair recommendations were properly addressed by the organization. The initial procedures were successful at “systematizing” the documentation and stewardship‐to‐completion of the Inspector's recommendation, however, there were complications with the original process:(1)The Inspector made a simple High, Medium or Low assessment of the priority/criticality of the recommendation. Frequently, this resulted in disagreements with Operations about the true priority of the recommendation.(2)If there was agreement on the priority of the recommendation, there was still disagreement on the relative rank within the priority‐which high priority was the highest priority?(3)With limited funds to spend on repairs, it was (and is) important to make sure that the money was being spent on the highest risk items that had the greatest risk reduction/cost benefit ratio.To address these concerns, the procedure was modified to incorporate a risk assessment of the recommendation by both the Inspector and Operations. In the new procedure, the Inspector describes the deficiency that he/she finds and assesses the probability of failure within a certain time‐frame. Operations must assess the consequences, from an environmental, safety and economics standpoint, were the failure to occur. These assessments are combined in the typical risk equation (risk = probability × consequences) to arrive at a severity index which serves to rank the recommendation relative to the other recommendations. Because Operations participates in the assessment there is very little disagreement about the priority of the recommendation. The severity index puts the recommendations in order so it is quite clear which are the highest priority recommendations. This process has helped to focus the entire organization on those deficiencies that represent the greatest risk with the result that less time and money is spent correcting items that have a low risk/cost benefit ratio, allowing these savings to be used to reduce the higher risks
ISSN:1066-8527
DOI:10.1002/prs.680170108
出版商:American Institute of Chemical Engineers
年代:1998
数据来源: WILEY
|
8. |
Pressure relief system documentation: Equipment based relational database is key to OSHA 1910.119 compliance |
|
Process Safety Progress,
Volume 17,
Issue 1,
1998,
Page 39-42
P. C. (Pat) Berwanger,
R. A. (Rob) Kreder,
Preview
|
PDF (315KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractUnder OSHA 1910.119, all Process Safety Management (PSM) facilities are required to keep their pressure relief system design information current. This article demonstrates why a pressure relief system design verification effort must be based on an equipment list, rather than a relief device list, in order to ensure that every piece of equipment is adequately protected. The formerly common practice of simply checking the design bases of all existing relief devices is deficient is deficient since this technique does not systematically ensure that every piece of equipment is protected.The “Berwanger Method” is a step by step process for designing or analyzing a pressure relief system to meet OSHA 1910.119 Process Safety Information (PSI) and Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) mandates. The method uses a relational database which tracks the relationships between protected equipment, potential overpressure scenarios, and protective devices.The challenge facing an operating company does not end once the design basis has been “verified”—the design basis information must also be maintained and be readily accessible to avoid costly reinvention of the wheel down the road. The “Berwanger Method” also addresses these maint
ISSN:1066-8527
DOI:10.1002/prs.680170109
出版商:American Institute of Chemical Engineers
年代:1998
数据来源: WILEY
|
9. |
Team situation awareness for process control safety and performance |
|
Process Safety Progress,
Volume 17,
Issue 1,
1998,
Page 43-48
David B. Kaber,
Mica R. Endsley,
Preview
|
PDF (765KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractThis paper defines situation awareness (SA) and discusses its importance to operator‐machine system safety and functioning in the context of process control activities. Specifically, identified are relationships of human detection of critical process cues converying the status of automated control systems and operator interpretation of the meaning and relevance of such information to the potential for negative incidents in chemical processing. Beyond individual operator SA in interacting with control systems, intra‐ and inter‐ work team SA are discussed for supporting individual attainment of process control responsibilities. Factors critical to team SA are discussed. “Road blocks” to team SA are also analytically examined. Lastly, methods for assessing individual and team SA are reviewed and vehicles for relating outcomes of these methods to changes in process control operator and team behavior to improve human‐machine system safety and performance
ISSN:1066-8527
DOI:10.1002/prs.680170110
出版商:American Institute of Chemical Engineers
年代:1998
数据来源: WILEY
|
10. |
A detailed reaction study of phosphorus trichloride and water |
|
Process Safety Progress,
Volume 17,
Issue 1,
1998,
Page 49-60
G. A. Melhem,
D. Reid,
Preview
|
PDF (1033KB)
|
|
摘要:
AbstractThis paper reports on a comprehensive literature search and small scale experimental work on the reaction characteristics of phosphorous trichloride and water. More than 30 tests were conducted, including both closed and open test cells. The water to phosphorus trichloride molar ratio was varied from 1 to 25. When in contact, water and phosphorus trichloride will form two liquid layers with a reaction starting at the interface. The impact of variables on reaction rates including the interface surface area, layer depth, and stirring were investigated experimentally. A reaction rate model that fits all the measured data is presented. Case studies illustrating the use of this data for emergency relief systems and vent containment design are presented in reference. [1].
ISSN:1066-8527
DOI:10.1002/prs.680170111
出版商:American Institute of Chemical Engineers
年代:1998
数据来源: WILEY
|
|