摘要:

Abstract.The author moves from the consideration of law as a set of rules serving as a means of socially regulating human conduct. He focuses on the fact that in order to fulfil its function, the law must be seen as a type of information. In this perspective law is a particular language and therefore gives rise to linguistic problems, linked to the technical character of juristic discourse. The author deals with some of the linguistic and sociological aspects of legal language and attempts to pinpoint some trends of interlingual development.

ISSN:0952-1917    

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00081.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

Abstract.The author criticizes Kelsen's distinction between static and dynamic systems of norms and his theory of legal dynamics. The author moreover presents the institutionalist conception of legal dynamics. Kelsen's concept of static systems is incompatible with normological scepticism: The deduction of rules from a basic principle depends on additional premises; even in static systems there is a kind of dynamics produced by actual facts. Kelsen's conception of legal dynamics is also incompatible with normological scepticism and with Kelsen's demand of purity of jurisprudence. In the institutionalist conception Iegal dynamics is rather conceived as an interplay of legal norms and facts. Empowering relations, the principle of co‐validity, temporal limits of norms, derogation, legal validity and the basic norm are analysed accordingly. Appendices deal with Paulson's empowering theory of legal norm and Lippold's double‐faced reconstruction of the legal or

ISSN:0952-1917    

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00082.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

摘要:

Abstract.The author deals with one aspect of the justification of governmental action and its product (the law). He focuses on the authoritative character of legal rule, analyzing the apparent capacity of governments to produce reasons for action not grounded on substantive moral considerations. The assumption of that capacity seems necessary in order to establish a general moral obligation to obey a government irrespective of the actions required. This question is faced in connection with the thesis that only a particular form of government, democracy, is morally justified insofar as it rests on legal rules issued by a legitimate source.

ISSN:0952-1917    

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00083.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0952-1917    

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00084.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0952-1917    

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00085.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0952-1917    

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00086.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0952-1917    

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00087.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0952-1917    

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00088.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY

ISSN:0952-1917    

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00089.x

出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd    

年代:1991

数据来源: WILEY