|
1. |
Three faces of justice: Competing ethical paradigms in forensic psychiatry |
|
Legal and Criminological Psychology,
Volume 19,
Issue 1,
2014,
Page 1-12
Gwen Adshead,
Preview
|
PDF (154KB)
|
|
摘要:
Respect for justice has traditionally been an essential principle of health care ethics. However, many bioethical accounts of justice focus only on distributive justice, and how resources for health care should be allocated. In this article, I will argue that the practice of forensic mental health care requires clinicians to engage with justice in three additional and different ways: justice as liberty and fairness; retributive justice and protection of the vulnerable; and justice as the promotion of virtue. I will argue that British forensic psychiatry favours retributive and protective justice; in contrast to a libertarian approach to forensic practice in the United States. I discuss how respect for justice as support for virtue complements therapeutic work with offenders, which aims at the development of pro‐social character. I will conclude that without respect for justice as virtue, there is a danger that clinical forensic psychiatry risks doing harm to patients and bringing the profession into disreput
ISSN:1355-3259
DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12021
年代:2014
数据来源: WILEY
|
2. |
Doing justice to justice |
|
Legal and Criminological Psychology,
Volume 19,
Issue 1,
2014,
Page 13-15
Jennifer Radden,
Preview
|
PDF (101KB)
|
|
摘要:
Adshead's recognition that only when taken together can the many different conceptions of justice accommodate what is called for in the particularly demanding setting of forensic mental health care, is to be applauded. Each must be honoured and built into the systems of assessment and treatment that are the tasks of the forensic psychiatrist, she demonstrates. Adshead's far‐reaching revisions could resolve much that is troubling about the present practice of forensic psychiatry. Yet how much these revisions can overcome the moral dilemmas associated with dual roles in forensic psychiatry, is not so clea
ISSN:1355-3259
DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12023
年代:2014
数据来源: WILEY
|
3. |
Competing ethical paradigms in forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology: Commentary for a special section of legal and criminological psychology |
|
Legal and Criminological Psychology,
Volume 19,
Issue 1,
2014,
Page 16-18
Andrew Day,
Preview
|
PDF (101KB)
|
|
摘要:
In her paperGwenAdshead (2013) identifies the principle of respect for justice as the foundation for ethical practice in forensic psychiatry. This commentary discusses how forensic psychologists have approached a key aspect of the justice principle, the ethical imperative to promote the welfare of the individual client. The approaches of the psychiatric and psychological professions are compared and the role of psychologists as allied health professionals working in the forensic setting considered.
ISSN:1355-3259
DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12022
年代:2014
数据来源: WILEY
|
4. |
Not just welfare over justice: Ethics in forensic consultation |
|
Legal and Criminological Psychology,
Volume 19,
Issue 1,
2014,
Page 19-29
Philip J. Candilis,
Tess M. S. Neal,
Preview
|
PDF (143KB)
|
|
摘要:
The ethics of forensic professionalism is often couched in terms of competing individual and societal values. Indeed, the welfare of individuals is often secondary to the requirements of society, especially given the public nature of courts of law, forensic hospitals, jails, and prisons. We explore the weaknesses of this dichotomous approach to forensic ethics, offering an analysis of Psychology's historical narrative especially relevant to the national security and correctional settings. We contend that a richer, more robust ethical analysis is available if practitioners consider the multiple perspectives in the forensic encounter, and acknowledge the multiple influences of personal, professional, and social values. The setting, context, or role is not sufficient to determine the ethics of forensic practice.
ISSN:1355-3259
DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12038
年代:2014
数据来源: WILEY
|
5. |
Respect of dignity as an ethical principle in forensic psychiatry. Commentary on ‘not just welfare over justice: Ethics in forensic consultation’ |
|
Legal and Criminological Psychology,
Volume 19,
Issue 1,
2014,
Page 30-32
Alec Buchanan,
Preview
|
PDF (104KB)
|
|
ISSN:1355-3259
DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12040
年代:2014
数据来源: WILEY
|
6. |
Organizational imbalance of welfare and justice: A commentary on Candilis and Neal |
|
Legal and Criminological Psychology,
Volume 19,
Issue 1,
2014,
Page 33-34
Astrid Birgden,
Preview
|
PDF (99KB)
|
|
ISSN:1355-3259
DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12041
年代:2014
数据来源: WILEY
|
7. |
The dual relationship problem in forensic and correctional practice: Community protection or offender welfare? |
|
Legal and Criminological Psychology,
Volume 19,
Issue 1,
2014,
Page 35-39
Tony Ward,
Preview
|
PDF (111KB)
|
|
ISSN:1355-3259
DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12039
年代:2014
数据来源: WILEY
|
8. |
Investigating the implicit theories of rape‐prone men using an interpretative bias task |
|
Legal and Criminological Psychology,
Volume 19,
Issue 1,
2014,
Page 40-53
Emily Blake,
Theresa A. Gannon,
Preview
|
PDF (508KB)
|
|
摘要:
Purpose.Ward (2000) has hypothesized that sexual offenders hold offence supportive implicit theories (ITs) or schemata that function to facilitate or maintain offending behaviour. The present research aimed to determine whether rape‐prone men hold the same offence supportive ITs as those that have been identified in rapists.Method.This study adopted both an explicit measure of ITs and also an implicit measure of ITs (an interpretative bias task). In the implicit task, participants viewed ambiguous stimuli (one‐sentence statements) that may be interpreted in either a rape‐supportive manner, or a non‐rape‐supportive manner. Participant's interpretation of the stimuli was assessed via a memory recognition task. We predicted that men higher on proclivity to rape – who presumably hold strong mental representations of rape‐supportive themes – would be more likely to interpret stimuli in a rape‐supportive manner relative to non‐rape‐supportive stimuli compared to men lower on rape proclivity.Results.Using multiple regression to determine the relative contributions of both explicit and implicit measures for predicting rape proclivity, we found that only the explicit, self‐report questionnaire and one of the ITs, ‘women are sex objects’ (as measured by the interpretative bias task), was significantly related to a person's rape proclivity score.Conclusions.This result indicates that rape‐prone men may not share the same beliefs as convicted rapists, which could be a key difference between men at risk of offending, and those who have been
ISSN:1355-3259
DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02056.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:2014
数据来源: WILEY
|
9. |
The showup identification procedure: An exploration of systematic biases |
|
Legal and Criminological Psychology,
Volume 19,
Issue 1,
2014,
Page 54-68
Victoria Z. Lawson,
Jennifer E. Dysart,
Preview
|
PDF (512KB)
|
|
摘要:
Purpose. Showups are common, yet little research has investigated the biasing factors that may influence showup identifications. We investigated the effects of cross‐race conditions and clothing bias on showup identification decisions. Additionally, we explored identification decisions made in a subsequent lineup dependent on race, clothing, and showup‐target‐presence.Methods. Participants watched a mock crime and were presented with a showup in which suspect race, target‐presence, and the clothing worn by the suspect were varied. Following a delay, participants viewed a target‐present or ‐absent lineup and were asked to make a second identification decision.Results. Presentation of the suspect in the clothing worn by the perpetrator increased choosing rates in both own‐race and other‐race conditions. Despite this, differential patterns of decision response latencies indicated that eyewitnesses may use clothing information differently when making own‐race compared to other‐race identification decisions. No evidence for an own‐race bias in showup identifications was found; however, other‐race lineup identifications were less accurate than own‐race lineup identifications. Further, participants in own‐race and other‐race conditions differed in the extent to which they were affected by multiple identification procedures. Viewing an own‐race innocent suspect in a showup increased subsequent false lineup identifications, while choosing the innocent suspect from the showup was necessary to increase false lineup identifications in other‐race conditions.Conclusions. Different situational factors may affect the identification accuracy of eyewitnesses in own‐race and other‐race conditions for both showup and lineup procedures. Particular caution is advised when showups are clothing‐biased
ISSN:1355-3259
DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02057.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:2014
数据来源: WILEY
|
10. |
The effect of line‐up administrator blindness on the recording of eyewitness identification decisions |
|
Legal and Criminological Psychology,
Volume 19,
Issue 1,
2014,
Page 69-79
Dario N. Rodriguez,
Melissa A. Berry,
Preview
|
PDF (499KB)
|
|
摘要:
Purpose.Line‐up administrators’ expectations have been shown to influence eyewitnesses’ identification decisions. Expectations may also influence administrators’ willingness to record witnesses’ decisions as positive identifications.Methods.Single‐ and double‐blind participant administrators presented a line‐up to a confederate witness, who identified either the suspect or a filler.Results.A hierarchical log‐linear analysis revealed an interaction effect of blindness and witness choice on participants’ recording of the identification: Single‐blind administrators were more likely to record the confederate's choice as a positive identification when the witness chose the suspect (vs. a filler), whereas double‐blind administrators’ records were not influenced by the witness's choice. An interaction between blindness and witness choice also emerged for participant administrators’ witness evaluations. Single‐blind administrators rated confederates who chose a filler as significantly less credible than those who chose a suspect; double‐blind administrators’ ratings were consistent across photo selection.Conclusions.Blindness influenced line‐up administrators’ record of line‐up outcomes. These results add to the growing body of research supporting the use
ISSN:1355-3259
DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02058.x
出版商:Blackwell Publishing Ltd
年代:2014
数据来源: WILEY
|
|