DEREGULATION: THE PRINCIPAL INCONCLUSIVE ARGUMENTS1
作者:
Warren J. Samuels,
James D. Shaffer,
期刊:
Review of Policy Research
(WILEY Available online 1982)
卷期:
Volume 1,
issue 3
页码: 463-469
ISSN:1541-132X
年代: 1982
DOI:10.1111/j.1541-1338.1982.tb00450.x
出版商: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
数据来源: WILEY
摘要:
The authors suggest that most arguments in favor of deregulation are really double‐edged swords which render the debate over deregulation inconclusive at best. They challenge the following positions as inconclusive: (1) that deregulation per se is good; (2) that it protects rights; (3) that deregulation removes uncertainties concerning the marketplace; (4) that it reduces “nitpicking” and coercive regulation; (5) that deregulation promotes greater productivity and efficiency; (6) that it combats inflation; (7) that regulations often cannot be justified by benefits over costs; and (8) there are serious problems of attaining optimum levels of regulation. Special interest groups in favor of deregulation are seen to bear a remarkable resemblance to groups opposed to deregul
点击下载:
PDF
(381KB)
返 回