In stimulus blocking the previous conditioning to one stimulus, A, followed by conditioning to the compound stimulus, AB, results in less conditioning to the other stimulus, B. Three experiments were performed to study the effect of the prior pairing of a stimulus A (noisy bottle) with lithium chloride followed by stimulus AB (saccharin plus noisy bottle) and lithium chloride pairings upon the strength of the aversion to the target stimuls B (saccharin) in NA‐depleted and control rats. The results obtained were not in keeping with a “blocking” explanation since enhancement, rather than blocking, of the saccharin aversion was obtained, and confirm several recent demonstrations of the “anti‐blocking” effect from investigations using the conditioned suppression procedure. DSP4 treatment attenuated the aversion‐enhancement (“anti‐blocking”) effects in all three experiments. The possibility that DSP4‐induced noradrenaline depletions may cause some disruption of between‐CS associations leading to a lesser higher order conditioning or stimulus generalisation is discussed and the present findings do add further evidence to the conclusion that noradrenaline is intimately involved i