Wesen und Bedeutung der „Zweckursache”︁ bei Aristoteles
作者:
Wolfgang Kullmann,
期刊:
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
(WILEY Available online 1982)
卷期:
Volume 5,
issue 1‐2
页码: 25-39
ISSN:0170-6233
年代: 1982
DOI:10.1002/bewi.19820050106
出版商: Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH&Co KGaA
关键词: Genetischer Code;Kausalmechanische Erklärung;Techne‐Modell;Teleologie;Teleonomie;Vitalismus;Zweckursache;Aristoteles;Hans Driesch;Antike
数据来源: WILEY
摘要:
AbstractNature and significance of the ‚final cause’︁ in Aristotle. − 1. In Aristotle's treatment of the tissues and the organs of animal body the search for their final cause is nothing but the search for their function. There are no speculations about theoriginof the purposive organisation of biological species, because species are eternal for him. − 2. When Aristotle is describing the production and propagation of an animal as goal‐directed, he does not exclude a causal explanation. He gives causal explanations at great length inDe generatione animalium: Against widespread views it is not the future goal that controls the development as a retroactive cause. In animal blood a sort of genetic code is included, which is represented by impulses (which you can imagine as undulatory motions). By these genetic impulses the form of the parent will be transported to the semen (or the menstrual blood in the case of woman) and from the semen to the germ of the offspring. − 3. The biological use of the concept of purpose or goal is quite different from the use in physics and cosmology. In ignorance of the law of inertia Aristotle tries to explain the continuous movement in the world metaphysically, by assuming a tendency of the stars towards the immaterial god. Terminologically he strictly distinguishes this tendency from the ‚final cause’︁ in biology. − 4. In policy man aims at welfare and ‚good life’︁. In history Aristotle deni
点击下载:
PDF
(1324KB)
返 回